การประเมินพื้นที่ความเหมาะสมของที่ด

Estimate the area of land suitable for rubber plantations in the province, bueng kan, according to guidelines to evaluate land (Land Evaluation) of the food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations or FAO has proposed in the year 2526 (1983) (FAO, 1983) by assessing appropriate land quality (Suitability Evaluation) between (the Land Qualities) and thus need to factor on growth and yield. The result of the classification level of a suitable space for 4 levels are as follows: appropriate area (S1) The area is ideal sompanok lang (S2) less space (S3) and inappropriate (N) and calculation of the area in each level and suitability of an area appropriate for each level are shown in tables 4.1 and 4.2 description of the image map as follows:

Assessing the suitability of land for rubber plantation in Bungoma according to the assessment of land (Land Evaluation) of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, or FAO had proposed in the year 2526 (FAO, 1983) with the appropriate assessment (Suitability. Evaluation) between the quality of land (Land Qualities) and factors used in rubber demand growth and yield. The classified area fitness level has four levels, including the very reasonable (S1) suitable medium (S2) areas less suitable (S3) and inappropriate (N) and the amount of space on each level is appropriate and distribution. The suitability of each level are presented in Table 4.1 and Figure 4.2 Chart described below.

evaluation area of land suitability for rubber plantation in the bang the assessment land (Land Evaluation) of the food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Or FAO that was presented in 2526, (FAO1983) with suitability assessment (Suitability Evaluation) between the land quality (Land Qualities) and factors of rubber to use in growth and yield. The effect of classified area appropriate level, 4 levels suitable area (S1).Suitable areas less (S3) and inappropriate (N). The calculation of the area and each appropriate levels and distribution of space suit each level display grid 4.1 and image maps, as Figure 4.2 explained as follows.