ทั้งนี้ ศาลอุทธรณ์ ประชุมสำนวนปรึกษ

The Court of Appeal discussed the case, too. Although the defendant is served MPsBut never before had. In the same manner with the plaintiff. In evidence to believe that. Defendant did not know the process that the trial court judge to dismiss the appeal judges did not agree with


.

This is. Court of appeal case consultation meetings and see that even though the defendant will have served the House of representatives. But it was never an audience with in the same manner as the plaintiff. In a way, so believe the defendant testify without knowing stage court judgment. Court of appeal Do not agree with. Judgment reversed, except Sue

the Court of Appeal judges meeting discussed and is of the opinion that even if the accused had been holding a position.but it was never well-wishers in the same manner as the plaintiff in the inquiry, we believe that the defendant did not know the steps of the Court of First Instance judgment, the Court of Appeal did not agree with judgment dismissing
back