4.5. ConclusionToourknowledge,thisi

4.5. Conclusion
Toourknowledge,thisisthe first studytouseGISwith
individualswithdisabilitieswhousedtobehomelesstodocument
the spatialpresenceofinthecommunityandtherelationshipto
integrationoutcomes.AstrengthofusingGISincommunity
integrationresearchisthatitisconcernedwithboth what is
happening, and where it ishappening(de Smithetal.,2007).
Through GIS,thecurrentstudyidentified significant activitiesand
interactionsreportedbyindividualsfollowinghousing;where
individualsarespendingtheirtime,whatsupportstheyare
seeking, andwheretheyaregoingtogetthem.Thesearesome
of theprincipalinquiriesofcommunityintegrationresearch(Yasui
and Berven,2009), whichwerevisuallycapturedandtestedusing
GIS. Whilealmosthalfthesampleidentified homelessservice
locations aspartoftheirimportantactivitiesandinsomecases
places ofsocialinteraction,itwaslessuseoftheseservicesthat
wasassociatedwithgreaterpsychologicalintegration.Taken
together,these findings maycharacterizethecomplexityofthe
integrationprocessforthispopulation,whereindividualsmaybe
seeking toforgeanon-homelessidentity,butstilldependenton
these locationsandservicesthatkeepthemconnectedtothe
homeless community.
Identifying whichaspectsofintegrationaremostmeaningful
for individualswhousedtobehomelessisessentialwhen
developing, implementing,andevaluatinginterventionsaimedat
improvingcommunityintegration.Thisstudyprovidesimportant
insight intofactorsthatmaybelinkedtopositiveintegration
outcomes suchasmakingwhereonelivedfeellikehome,feeling
part ofthecommunity,andincreasedfamilyinvolvement.These
results arepromising,asthesearemutablefactorsthatmayhave
potentialforimprovementandcanbeassessedandchangedatthe
programlevel.Althoughtheactivityspacemeasureswerenot
associatedwithcommunityintegrationoutcomesintheexpected
direction,GISprovidedmeaningfulinformationaboutindividual's
spatial presenceinthecommunityandwhereimportantactivities
occurredaspartofintegrationefforts.Continuedresearchis
needed usingaspatialmappingapproachtoevaluateaccessibility
to resourcesavailableinthecommunityareainconjunctionwith
activityspacemeasuresasspatialfactorsthatcanpromoteor
impede integrationefforts.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

4.5. Conclusion
Toourknowledge, Thisisthe First StudytouseGISwith
Individualswithdisabilitieswhousedtobehomelesstodocument
The. What is Happening, and Where it Ishappening (de Smithetal., the 2,007th). Through GIS, Thecurrentstudyidentified significant. Andwheretheyaregoingtogetthem.Thesearesome of Theprincipalinquiriesofcommunityintegrationresearch (Yasui and Berven, 2 009), Whichwerevisuallycapturedandtestedusing GIS. Whilealmosthalfthesampleidentified Homelessservice Locations Aspartoftheirimportantactivitiesandinsomecases Places findings Maycharacterizethecomplexityofthe Integrationprocessforthispopulation, Whereindividualsmaybe Seeking Toforgeanon-Homelessidentity, Butstilldependenton these Locationsandservicesthatkeepthemconnectedtothe Homeless Community. Identifying Whichaspectsofintegrationaremostmeaningful for Individualswhousedtobehomelessisessentialwhen Developing,. Intofactorsthatmaybelinkedtopositiveintegration outcomes Suchasmakingwhereonelivedfeellikehome, Feeling Part Ofthecommunity, Andincreasedfamilyinvolvement.These results. Usingaspatialmappingapproachtoevaluateaccessibility to integrationefforts.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

4.5. Conclusion
Toourknowledge thisisthe first, studytouseGISwith

, individualswithdisabilitieswhousedtobehomelesstodocument the Spatialpresenceofinthecommunityandtherelationshipto

, integrationoutcomes.AstrengthofusingGISincommunity integrationresearchisthatitisconcernedwithboth What is
happening and where, it ishappening (de Smithetal, 2007).
Through, GISThecurrentstudyidentified significant activitiesand
interactionsreportedbyindividualsfollowinghousing; where
individualsarespendingtheirtime whatsupportstheyare
seeking,,, Andwheretheyaregoingtogetthem.Thesearesome
of. Theprincipalinquiriesofcommunityintegrationresearch (Yasui
and, Berven 2009), whichwerevisuallycapturedandtestedusing
GIS.? Whilealmosthalfthesampleidentified homelessservice
.Locations aspartoftheirimportantactivitiesandinsomecases
places. Ofsocialinteraction itwaslessuseoftheseservicesthat

, wasassociatedwithgreaterpsychologicalintegration.Taken, together these. Findings maycharacterizethecomplexityofthe

, integrationprocessforthispopulation whereindividualsmaybe seeking. Toforgeanon-homelessidentity butstilldependenton
these,, Locationsandservicesthatkeepthemconnectedtothe
.Homeless community.
Identifying. Whichaspectsofintegrationaremostmeaningful
for. Individualswhousedtobehomelessisessentialwhen
developing,, Implementing andevaluatinginterventionsaimedat

, improvingcommunityintegration.Thisstudyprovidesimportant insight. Intofactorsthatmaybelinkedtopositiveintegration
outcomes. Suchasmakingwhereonelivedfeellikehome feeling
part ofthecommunity,,Andincreasedfamilyinvolvement.These
results. Arepromising asthesearemutablefactorsthatmayhave


, potentialforimprovementandcanbeassessedandchangedatthe programlevel.Althoughtheactivityspacemeasureswerenot associatedwithcommunityintegrationoutcomesintheexpected
direction GISprovidedmeaningfulinformationaboutindividual ', s
spatial. Presenceinthecommunityandwhereimportantactivities
.Occurredaspartofintegrationefforts.Continuedresearchis
needed. Usingaspatialmappingapproachtoevaluateaccessibility
to. Resourcesavailableinthecommunityareainconjunctionwith

impede activityspacemeasuresasspatialfactorsthatcanpromoteor integrationefforts.