Socrates VS Euthyphro โสกราตีส บทส

Socrates VS Euthyphro

โสกราตีส

บทสนทนาเรื่องยูไทโฟร (EUTHYPHRO) นี้เป็นเรื่องของการไต่ถามถึงสิ่งที่เป็นสุทธิธรรม (Piety) กับอสุทธิธรรม (Impiety) ระหว่างยูไทโฟรผู้ซึ่งกำลังจะฟ้องบิดาของตนด้วยคดีฆาตกรรม เนื่องจากเหตุที่ว่าบิดาของตนได้ฆ่าลูกจ้าง เพราะขณะที่ลูกจ้างเมาลูกจ้างได้ทะเลาะวิวาทกับลูกจ้างในเรือนจนถึงกับฆ่าทาสคนนั้นตาย และที่ศาลกับอีกฝ่ายหนึ่งก็คือโสกราตีสที่ต้องไปศาลเพราะถูกเมเลตัสฟ้องร้องว่า เขาเป็นคนทำให้เด็กหนุ่มนั้นมีพฤติกรรมที่ผิดแปลกไปจากเดิม เหมือนกับว่าโสกราตีสได้สร้างเทพใหม่ๆ เด็กหนุ่มเหล่านั้นเห็นชอบจึงศรัทธา ซึ่งบทสนทนานี้ถือกันว่าเป็นปรัชญาวิธีของโสกราตีสโดยแท้จริง กล่าวคือ โสกราตีสมีการจับจุดอ่อนของฝ่ายตรงข้ามหรือคู่สนทนา ซึ่งในที่นี้ก็คือยูไทโฟร แล้วพยายามสรุปให้เห็นว่าฝ่ายคู่สนทนานั้นคิดแล้วตอบมาอย่างไร จากนั้นจึงถามกลับเพื่อสรุปให้เห็นว่าฝ่ายคู่สนทนายังคงตอบอย่างชัดเจน คงเส้นคงวา เหมือนเดิมต่อไปหรือไม่ และให้ข้อสรุปที่ชัดเจนหรือไม่ ซึ่งหากโสกราตีสยังไม่ยอมรับในคำตอบก็จะตั้งคำถามกลับไปเรื่อยๆเพื่อหาคำตอบเพื่อเสาะหาความจริง เหมือนกับในบทสนทนาระหว่างโสกราตีสกับยูไทโฟรในเรื่องสุทธิธรรมนี้
ในช่วงต้นของการเริ่มสนทนานั้น โสกราตีสกับยูไทโฟรได้กล่าวถึงเหตุของการมาขึ้นศาลของกันและกัน และเป็นมูลเหตุที่ทำให้โสกราตีสตั้งคำถามว่า เหตุใดจึงทำให้ยูไทโฟรตัดสินใจฟ้องพ่อของตนเองว่าเป็นฆาตกรฆ่าลูกจ้าง โดยยูไทโฟรมองว่าตนเองต้องทำเพราะประเด็นนี้เป็นเรื่องของ “สุทธิธรรม” โสกราตีสก็ยกย่องยูไทโฟรว่า เป็นผู้ที่รู้จักผิดชอบชั่วดีและมีภูมิปัญญาใช้เหตุผลในการตัดสินใจมากกว่าอารมณ์ จากนั้นโสเครติสได้ถามยูไทโฟรว่าผู้ใดคือผู้ที่ถูกฆาตกรรม โดยโสเครติสได้คาดเดาว่าคงเป็นญาติของยูไทโฟรไม่เช่นนั้นคงไม่ถึงกับฟ้องร้องขึ้นศาล ยูไทโฟรจึงตอบว่าบาปย่อมเกิดกับผู้ที่ทำความผิด ไม่ได้ขึ้นกับว่าตัวบุคคลนั้นเป็นใคร ในกรณีนี้ผู้ที่ถูกฆาตกรรมคือลูกจ้างของยูไทโฟร ที่ได้ทำการฆ่าทาสพ่อของยูไทโฟรด้วยความมึนเมา พ่อของยูไทโฟรจึงลงโทษแล้วขังไว้ ต่อมาลูกจ้างผู้นี้ได้ตายไป ยูไทโฟรจึงฟ้องพ่อตนโทษฐานที่ทำลูกจ้างตาย และได้กล่าวว่าญาติที่พากันติเตียนตนว่าช่างไม่รู้เสียเลยว่าอะไรคือสุทธิ อะไรคืออสุทธิ เมื่อได้ยินดังนั้นโสเครติสก็เชื่อและหวังในตัวยูไทโฟรว่าจะช่วยในสิ่งที่โสกราตีสสงสัยได้และพยายามไต่ถามว่า แท้จริงแล้วนั้นสุทธิธรรมของยูไทโฟรนั้นเป็นอย่างไร โดยอ้างว่าจะนำความรู้นั้นไปใช้ในการแก้ตัวในศาล ยูไทรโฟได้ตอบว่าสิ่งที่เทพชอบคือสุทธิธรรม สิ่งที่เทพไม่ชอบคืออสุทธิธรรม ต่อมาโสกราตีสจึงเกิดคำถามมากมายที่ต้องการรู้คำตอบโดยต้องการคำตอบจากยูไทโฟร และถกเถียงกันไม่ได้คำตอบจนแยกย้ายกันไป
จากโจทก์ที่ให้เลือกว่าเห็นด้วยกับใครระหว่างโสกราตีสและยูไทโฟร โดยทางกลุ่มของเราเห็นด้วยกับ โสกราตีส เนื่องจากเหตุผลดังต่อไปนี้
เหตุผลและความคิดของยูไทโฟรมีความขัดแย้งในตนเอง เห็นได้จากตอนที่โสกราตีสนั้นได้ถามยูไทโฟรว่า ทำไมถึงได้ฟ้องบิดาตนเอง ยูไทโฟรได้กล่าวตอบว่า การที่ยูไทโฟรฟ้องบิดาตนเองนั้นถือว่าเป็นการกระทำที่สุทธิธรรม แต่ถ้าไม่ฟ้องนั้นถือว่าเป็นการกระทำที่ไม่สุทธิธรรม จึงทำให้โสกราตีสเกิดข้อสงสัยว่า อะไรคือสุทธิธรรม และ อะไรคืออสุทธิธรรม ยูไทโฟรก็ได้ตอบคำถามว่า “สุทธิธรรม (Piety) คือ การกระทำ ดังเช่นที่เขากำลังประกอบอยู่ตอนนี้
คือฟ้องพ่อของตนเองซึ่งเป็นคนที่ฆ่าลูกจ้างโดยไม่คิดก่อน หรือประพฤติปฏิบัติทำนองนี้ ไม่ว่าผู้นั้นจะเป็นบิดามารดาหรือใครก็ตาม ถ้าไม่ฟ้องก็เท่ากับประพฤติอสุทธิธรรม (Impiety)...ความยุติธรรม (Justice)อยู่ตรงที่ต้องไม่ละผู้ประพฤติผิด
ไม่ว่าเขาผู้นั้นจะเป็นใครก็ตาม...” จากคำตอบนี้แสดงให้เห็นว่ายุไทโฟรมีความคิดเป็นของตนอยู่แล้วว่าอะไรคือสุทธิธรรม อะไรคืออสุทธิธรรม และมีความมั่นใจและเชื่อมั่นว่าความคิดของตนนั้นถูกต้องอย่างแน่นอน ซึ่งสามารถเห็นได้จากคำพูดที่ยูไทโฟรตอบคำถามโสกราตีสในครั้งแรก คือคำถามที่ว่า “What sort of thing do you say the pious are, with respect to murder and other things as well? Or is not holy , just by itself, the same in every action ? And the unholy, in turn, the opposite of all the holy--is it not like itself, and does not everything which is to be unholy have a certain single character with respect to unholiness? " และยูไทโฟรได้ตอบว่า "No doubt, Socrates." และหลังจากนั้นยังคงยืนยันในความคิดตนอธิบายให้โสกราตีสฟังถึงเหตุผล แต่เหตุผลที่ยูไทโฟรกล่าวมานั้นได้ถูกหักล้างไปด้วยคำถามของโสกราตีสที่นำมาอธิบายความคิดของโสกราตีสอีกที ยูไทโฟรกล่าว่า "The holy is what I am doing now, prosecuting murder and temple theft and everything of the sort, whater father or mother or anyoneelse is quilty of it. And not prosecuting is unholy.”และยูไทโฟรได้บอกว่า “What is dear to the godsis holy, and is not dear to them is unholy.” หมายความว่า ยูไทโฟรเชื่อว่า Human who have a mistake is quilty and holy is something that gods love.แต่โสกราตีสได้เเย้งว่า แม้แต่เทพด้วยกันยังมีทัศนะคติที่แตกต่างกัน จนทำสงครามรบ ทะเลาะกันจนเกิดเรื่องราวตำนาน ถูกบันทึกไว้โดยที่ยูไทโฟรเองก็เชื่อ จึงเกิดการหักล้างว่า เมื่อทัศนะคติของเทพเองก็ไม่เหมือนกันและ holy กับ unholy ของเทพล่ะจะมั่นคง same in every action ได้ยังไง In this point ได้เเสดงให้เห็นว่าความคิดของยูไทโฟรนั้นขัดเเย้งกันเอง คือ เชื่อว่าเทพมีจริงและเป็นผู้ indicate what is holy and unholy. But believe that เทพเคยขัดเเย้งกันเองจนเกิดการรบ ซึ่งหมายความว่าทัศนะคติของเทพแต่ละองค์ไม่เหมือนกัน ดังคำพูดของโสเครติสส่วนนี้
SOC. Then you have not answered my question, my friend. I did not ask you what same thing happens to be both holy and unholy; yet what is dear to the gods is hateful to the gods, it seems. And so, Euthyphro, it would not be surprising if what you are now doing in punishing your father were dear to Zeus, but hateful to Cronos and Uranus, and loved by Hephaestus, but hateful to Hera, and if any of the other gods disagree about it, the same will be true of them too.
เมื่อพิจารณาต่อไปก็เกิดคำถามตามมาว่า สุทธิธรรมนั้นคือความยุติธรรมใช่หรือไม่
ซึ่งโสกราตีสตั้งคำถามต่อยูไทโฟรไว้ว่า “ ทุกๆ สิ่ง ซึ่งยุติธรรมจะต้องบริสุทธ์ด้วยหรือ หรือสุทธิธรรมทั้งมวลจะต้องยุติธรรม และมิใช่ยุติธรรมทั้งมวลจะต้องบริสุทธิ์หมด เพียงบริสุทธิ์บ้าง เป็นอื่นบ้าง” ดังเช่นบทสนทนาดังต่อไปนี้
SOC. : “ I mean exactly the opposite of what the poet meant when he said that he was “unwilling to insult Zeus, the Creator, who made all things; for where there is fear there is also reverence.” I disagree with him. Shall I tell you why? ”
SOC. : “ Where there is reverence, however, there is also fear. Fo

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

Socrates VS Euthyphro Socrates Yu tai's dialogue frozen (EUTHYPHRO), this is a matter of ask what is our net (Piety) with asu thathi Dharma (Impiety) between u-Tai, who was frozen to sue their father with murder because the father of killed employees. While drunk, officer employed in prison employees have a quarrel with the slaves killed until dead and that one party to another, the Court is required to interpret the Court's wide range of Sok because Lake MLS that prosecution was secularization. He is a person who makes a young child has behavior that is different from the original, like how to create new beings, sadai hit Sok. Young man they agreed with faith that this conversation is considered a method of philosophy of Sok, hit by a real. That is, is a hit at Sok catch your opponent's weaknesses or pair discussions. Which in this case is that you have already tried the frozen Tiger concluded that the conversation partner parties, how come replies. Then ask for a summary, see party people still clearly answered. Invariably The same or not, and whether or not the obvious conclusion, that if the city does not accept sayang hit Sok in answers to questions to answer to the needs to seek the truth, like in the conversation between Sok, hit the net in the frozen sakap Tai Yu Dharma.At the beginning of the conversation begins, sakap Tai Yu Sok-hit the frozen grounds of mentioned Court of each other and is the reason that makes the Sok, hit question satang why cause u Tai frozen decided to sue her own father is a murderer, kill employees. By Yu Tai from ongwa ourselves to do, because this issue is a matter of "net equity" Sok, hit Jeremy praised Yu Tai frozen as known good wisdom and reasoning in a decision more than emotion. Then, according to the website khreti u ask sadai Tai frozen who is who is murder. Assuming the domain khreti sadai guessing whether he is a relative of Yu Tai is not frozen so he could go to court to sue. Yu Tai frozen so that Sin will come to those who make mistakes. Not, depending on whether a person who is. In this case, the person is murder is employed of Yu Tai frozen that have made killing a slave father of Thai frozen with drunk. Father Yu tai's frozen it sanctions and detention. This officer, who later died. Yu tai's father himself, so the frozen base penalty charge is made and employees have said the relatives together to blame himself that he did not know was that the net-what is what is asu thathi. When I hear, so please, according to Jeremy khreti and hope in a frozen Tai Yu that helps things, and trying to interpret sotngasai Sok ask whether in fact the net equity of the Yu Tai-what is frozen. By claiming to put the knowledge to use to excuse in court. U Sai fo has said something that was like the net is wrong. What I don't like is the gods Dharma Raja thathi asu subsequent questions sachueng Sok hit many who wanted to know the answer by answers from u-Tai frozen and debate is not the answer to disperse.From the plaintiff to choose which agree with anyone between the University Library and hit the frozen Tiger Sok. Through our group agree with Socrates the following reasons. Reasons and thoughts of Yu Tai frozen conflicts in ourselves. Seen from the episode, asked sanan hit Sok Yu Tai frozen why did sue the father himself United Thai frozen said said that Yu Tai frozen sue the father himself is regarded as the acts of Dharma, but if that is not the net charge is treated as an action that is not in our net so Sok, hit the sakoet doubt that net-what is wrong and what is justice Yoo thathi asu Tai frozen, it has answers to questions that "the net" (Piety) is to act like he is being built now.Their father is, which is to accuse people who kill employed without thinking before operating this way behave? Regardless of whether they are parents or anyone. If not, Sue, it is equal to the phriti Dharma thathi asu (Impiety) ... Justice (Justice) is that not all people an.ไม่ว่าเขาผู้นั้นจะเป็นใครก็ตาม...” จากคำตอบนี้แสดงให้เห็นว่ายุไทโฟรมีความคิดเป็นของตนอยู่แล้วว่าอะไรคือสุทธิธรรม อะไรคืออสุทธิธรรม และมีความมั่นใจและเชื่อมั่นว่าความคิดของตนนั้นถูกต้องอย่างแน่นอน ซึ่งสามารถเห็นได้จากคำพูดที่ยูไทโฟรตอบคำถามโสกราตีสในครั้งแรก คือคำถามที่ว่า “What sort of thing do you say the pious are, with respect to murder and other things as well? Or is not holy , just by itself, the same in every action ? And the unholy, in turn, the opposite of all the holy--is it not like itself, and does not everything which is to be unholy have a certain single character with respect to unholiness? " และยูไทโฟรได้ตอบว่า "No doubt, Socrates." และหลังจากนั้นยังคงยืนยันในความคิดตนอธิบายให้โสกราตีสฟังถึงเหตุผล แต่เหตุผลที่ยูไทโฟรกล่าวมานั้นได้ถูกหักล้างไปด้วยคำถามของโสกราตีสที่นำมาอธิบายความคิดของโสกราตีสอีกที ยูไทโฟรกล่าว่า "The holy is what I am doing now, prosecuting murder and temple theft and everything of the sort, whater father or mother or anyoneelse is quilty of it. And not prosecuting is unholy.”และยูไทโฟรได้บอกว่า “What is dear to the godsis holy, and is not dear to them is unholy.” หมายความว่า ยูไทโฟรเชื่อว่า Human who have a mistake is quilty and holy is something that gods love.แต่โสกราตีสได้เเย้งว่า แม้แต่เทพด้วยกันยังมีทัศนะคติที่แตกต่างกัน จนทำสงครามรบ ทะเลาะกันจนเกิดเรื่องราวตำนาน ถูกบันทึกไว้โดยที่ยูไทโฟรเองก็เชื่อ จึงเกิดการหักล้างว่า เมื่อทัศนะคติของเทพเองก็ไม่เหมือนกันและ holy กับ unholy ของเทพล่ะจะมั่นคง same in every action ได้ยังไง In this point ได้เเสดงให้เห็นว่าความคิดของยูไทโฟรนั้นขัดเเย้งกันเอง คือ เชื่อว่าเทพมีจริงและเป็นผู้ indicate what is holy and unholy. But believe that เทพเคยขัดเเย้งกันเองจนเกิดการรบ ซึ่งหมายความว่าทัศนะคติของเทพแต่ละองค์ไม่เหมือนกัน ดังคำพูดของโสเครติสส่วนนี้ SOC. Then you have not answered my question, my friend. I did not ask you what same thing happens to be both holy and unholy; yet what is dear to the gods is hateful to the gods, it seems. And so, Euthyphro, it would not be surprising if what you are now doing in punishing your father were dear to Zeus, but hateful to Cronos and Uranus, and loved by Hephaestus, but hateful to Hera, and if any of the other gods disagree about it, the same will be true of them too.Considering further the question was based on the net that is fairer than justice or not. That's the question satang per hit Sok Yu Tai frozen, that "everything that the sut must be the net service, or by States parties must be fair, justice and non-justice, States are going to be just another tongborisut innocent?" conversation, such as the following:SOC. : " I mean exactly the opposite of what the poet meant when he said that he was "unwilling to insult Zeus, the Creator, who made all things; for where there is fear there is also reverence." I disagree with him. Shall I tell you why? "SOC. : " Where there is reverence, however, there is also fear. Fo

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

Socrates VS Euthyphro Socrates dialogue about the real Aphrodite (EUTHYPHRO) is a matter of interpretation of what the net fair (Piety) with net fair (Impiety) during the time of Aphrodite, who is suing his father. identity with murder The reason that his father had killed the employee. Because the employee was employed drunken brawl with the workmen in the house to kill the slave died. And the court with one another, it was Socrates who had to go to court because the prosecution's Son. He is a young man makes a strange behavior from the original. Like that Socrates has created new gods. He agreed, so they believe. This conversation has been held that the philosophy of Socrates, by the way, that is true, Socrates has to capture your opponent's weaknesses or conversations. In this case, it is the time of Aphrodite. Then try to conclude that the conversations that I think on it. Then asked to conclude that the party can continue to clearly invariably the same or not. And the conclusion is clear or not. If Socrates did not accept the answer to question back to me for answers, to seek truth. As the dialogue between Socrates and the Four Times of the net fair, this is the beginning of the conversation. Socrates with the real cause of Aphrodite was mentioned in a court of another. And this is the reason that makes Socrates asking. Why has the time Aphrodite decided to sue his own father as a murderer employees. Aphrodite by the time they do not, for the issue of "net fair" Socrates is regarded as the real Aphrodite. Those who know good and evil, wisdom and logic rather than emotion in decision making. Then Socrates asked the Times Aphrodite that one who was murdered. Assuming a credit condos have guessed that it was a relative of the Four Times or he would not even claim to court. Aphrodite, the Times said it was a sin to those who make mistakes. Not based on what the person is. In this case, the murder was an employee of the Times Aphrodite. The father of the liberated slaves to kill Aphrodite with drunkenness. The father of the Times Aphrodite punished and imprisoned. The employee who has died. The Four Times of defrauding his father filed a worker's death. And they said, would denounce their relatives that I had never forget what the net. What is the net Upon hearing this, Socrates, I believe and hope in the time of Aphrodite that will help in what Socrates, and to ask that question. Indeed, the net fair of the Times Aphrodite was. Claiming that put that knowledge to use to defend in court. U Tri Four replied that what I like is the net fair. What I do not like is the net fair. The Socrates so many questions that need to know the answer to demand answers from the time of Aphrodite. And debate is not the answer to disperse the Plaintiff to agree on who between Socrates and the Times of Aphrodite. The group of us agree with Socrates because of the following reasons why the Times and the idea of a conflict in their own folder. Seen from the Socrates was asked at that time Aphrodite. Why not sue their father The Times said Aphrodite said. The Four Times the charges against his own net is considered an act of justice. If the lawsuit is deemed to be acts of the net fair. Therefore, Socrates was suspected. What is wrong and what is the net net fair. The Four Times answered the question, "Sudhitham (Piety) is to act like he is assembling now is suing his own father, a man who killed an employee without thinking first. Or behave like this Whether it be a parent or anyone. If not sue her, she was doing the wrong net. (Impiety) ... Justice (Justice) is the need of the misconduct , whether he shall be anyone ... "From this answer shows that precipitation Times Aphrodite has a mind of its own, then what is the net fair. What is the net fair And the confidence to believe that their ideas are right, of course. This can be seen from the words of the Times Aphrodite answer Socrates in first. Is the question, "What sort of thing do you say the pious are, with respect to murder and other things as well? Or is not holy, just by itself, the same in every action? And the unholy, in turn, the opposite. of all the holy - is it not like itself, and does not everything which is to be unholy have a certain single character with respect to unholiness? "Aphrodite and the Times said," No doubt, Socrates. "And after that. still insist on the idea that Socrates explains to listen to reason. But the real reason Aphrodite said that was offset by the question of Socrates, who brought the idea of Socrates again. The Times Four Craig said: "The holy is what I am doing now, prosecuting murder and temple theft and everything of the sort, whater father or mother or anyoneelse is quilty of it. And not prosecuting is unholy." And the Times Aphrodite. saying that "What is dear to the godsis holy, and is not dear to them is unholy." This means that the time Aphrodite believe that Human who have a mistake is quilty and holy is something that gods love. But Socrates. I have a YONG Even God with a different attitude to the war fighters fight until the legendary story. Saved by the time it was believed that Aphrodite. It was clear that the The attitude of the statute itself is not the same and holy and unholy of deities that are stable same in every action has also In this point is just to indicate that the idea of an independent Aphrodite, then scrub it YONG friendly is to believe. that God is real and who indicate what is holy and unholy. But believe that I've polished up until the battle Yong friendly. This means that the attitude of the individual's body is different. The words of Socrates, this SOC. Then you have not answered my question, my friend. I did not ask you what same thing happens to be both holy and unholy; yet what is dear to the gods is hateful to the gods, it seems. And so, Euthyphro, it would. not be surprising if what you are now doing in punishing your father were dear to Zeus, but hateful to Cronos and Uranus, and loved by Hephaestus, but hateful to Hera, and if any of the other gods disagree about it, the same will be. true of them too. When considering the question whether it was. Net fair is fair or not , which Socratic questioning the Four Times that "everything is fair to be purified with. Ensemble will be fair or unfair net. Ensemble will be pure and not fair. Just some fresh As others have "conversations as follows SOC. : "I mean exactly the opposite of what the poet meant when he said that he was" unwilling to insult Zeus, the Creator, who made ​​all things; for where there is fear there is also reverence. "I disagree with him. Shall I. You tell Why? " SOC.: "Where there is Reverence, however, there is also Fear. Fo.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

Socrates VS Socrates Euthyphro



.The dialogue about Yu Tai Aphrodite (EUTHYPHRO) this is the asking what is Mr. (Piety) with sperm ทธิธรรม (Impiety) between Yu Tai Aphrodite who was going to sue their father with the murder. Because of the fact that their father has killed the employee.And the other is Socrates to court because of being male Quintus Sue. He made the boy has an unusual behavior from the original. Like Socrates has created a new GodWhich this conversation is considered as a way of Philosophy Socrates truly, that is, Socrates has to catch your opponent's weakness or talk, which here is Yu Tai Aphrodite.Then asked back to conclude that the interlocutor, still answer clearly, invariably the same or not and give the conclusion that clear?Just like in the conversation between Socrates and Yu Tai frozen in this Mr.
.In the early of starting a conversation. Socrates with Yu Tai Frodo mentioned cause of coming to court each other. And it is indicated that Socrates questions. Why do Yu Tai Aphrodite decided to sue his own father that was the murderer of employees."Mr." Socrates was praised Yu Tai Aphrodite. A conscience and wisdom reason in the decision over emotion. Then, Socrates asked Yu Tai Aphrodite who is who was murdered.Yu Tai Aphrodite answered sin will be with those who committed a crime. Not what the person who it is. In this case, the murder was an employee of Yu Tai Aphrodite. The father of Yu Tai Aphrodite with killing slaves intoxication.Employees who later died. Yu Tai Aphrodite is suing you for doing their employee's death. And said the relative to criticize that they don't know at all what is the net, what is the sperm rights.Indeed, that Mr. Frodo of Yu Tai is like. By claiming to bring that knowledge to use in a vindication in court. Yu Tai (photo said what is God like Mr. What is God like Mr.The debate does not answer to disperse
.The plaintiffs to choose that you agree with someone between Socrates Yu Tai and Aphrodite. By the way, our group agrees with Socrates. Due to the following reasons
.The reason and the idea of Yu Tai frozen conflict in themselves. Seen from when Socrates that ask Yu Tai Aphrodite why sue their father Yu Tai Aphrodite said replied. The Yu Tai Aphrodite Sue self father is considered the act that Mr.Therefore, Socrates doubt that what is and what is Mr. Mr. Yu Tai Aphrodite's question, "Mr. (Piety) is the action. As he was the right now!Is sue their father who killed employees without thinking. Or behave like this. No matter who are parents or anyone. If you don't sue is equal to behave to Mr. (Impiety)...Justice (Justice) that have no who misbehave
whether he's someone else..."From this answer show that Yu Euthyphro ideas into their already know what is what Mr. hand to Mr. And are confident and believe that his mind was absolutely correctIs the question. "What sort of thing do you say the, pious areWith respect to murder and other things as well? Or is not holy just itself, by, same the in every action? And, the unholy. In turn the opposite, of all the holy--is it not, like itself and does not everything which is to be unholy have a certain. Single character with respect to unholiness? "And Yu Tai Aphrodite said," No, doubt Socrates."And then continue to insist on the idea of their explain to Socrates to listen to reason. But the reason that Yu Tai Aphrodite said that was cleared with a question of Socrates was used to explain the thought of Socrates again, Yu Tai fo said: "The." Holy is what I am, doing nowProsecuting murder and temple theft and everything of the sort whater father, or mother or anyoneelse is quilty of, it. And not prosecuting is unholy. "Yu Tai Frodo and said" What is dear to the, Godsis holy and is not dear to them is unholy. " Mean, Yu Tai Aphrodite believe Human who have a mistake is quilty and holy is something that Gods love.But Socrates so yeah that Even the gods together also have different attitude to war battle fought until it has happened in long time. Be saved by Yu Tai Aphrodite also believe the offsetting.Holy with unholy of divine will, stable same in every action? In this point has shown that the idea of Yu Tai Aphrodite is polished and Yeng themselves. Believe that God is real and the indicate what is holy and unholy.But believe that God ever against my friendly and Yeng battle. Which means that the attitude of the gods each organization is different. As the words of Socrates this part
SOC. Then you have not answered, my question my friend. I did not ask you what same thing happens. To be both holy and unholy;Yet what is dear to the gods is hateful to, the gods it seems. And, so Euthyphro it would, not be surprising if what you. Are now doing in punishing your father were dear, to Zeus but hateful to Cronos and Uranus and loved by Hephaestus but,,, Hateful, to Hera and if any of the other gods disagree about it the same, will be true of them too.
.The next question followed. Mr. is justice?
.The Socrates question Yu Tai Aphrodite, that "every thing, which is fair to innocent? Or Mr. sisters must be fair. Not fair and all must be pure. Just pure, is another. "SOC. "I mean exactly the opposite of what the poet meant when he said that he was" unwilling to insult Zeus the Creator,,, Who made all things; for where there is fear there is also reverence. "I disagree with him. Shall I tell you why?"
SOC.? : "Where there, is reverence however there is, also fear. Fo.