5. Performance indicators and best practices5.1 IntroductionPerformanc การแปล - 5. Performance indicators and best practices5.1 IntroductionPerformanc อังกฤษ วิธีการพูด

5. Performance indicators and best

5. Performance indicators and best practices
5.1 Introduction
Performance of the transport and logistics sector has been mentioned several times in the previous chapters (Ch.2.6 and 4.7). However, data gathering is still challenging. Often, operations and performance are not monitored and reported, both on national and sector/ company level. Therefore, this task of the study focused on the review and analysis of existing methods used to assess logistical performance at the national and company levels as well as the identification of the gaps in currently used methods.
This is based on a consistent and common theoretical framework to identify the main factors, forces and indicators that are needed for each analysis level.
An analytical framework was used to identify Key Performance Areas (KPA) of the logistics sector for alternative levels of analysis (government, logistics industry (third party service providers- 3PL)). Based on this, existing methodologies and measures were reviewed and analysed on macro- level (national level) and micro-level (company level).
The obstacles concerning detailed and comparable statistical data of the logistics sector analysed in chapter 2 were taken into account. These findings are structured and assessed and best practises for different levels are identified. All these are incorporated and concrete proposals concerning the improvement of logistic performance measurement are provided. These recommendations provide references for the concrete evaluation and comparisons of the performance of the logistics sector analysed in chapter 2.
0/5000
จาก: -
เป็น: -
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1: [สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
5. Performance indicators and best practices5.1 IntroductionPerformance of the transport and logistics sector has been mentioned several times in the previous chapters (Ch.2.6 and 4.7). However, data gathering is still challenging. Often, operations and performance are not monitored and reported, both on national and sector/ company level. Therefore, this task of the study focused on the review and analysis of existing methods used to assess logistical performance at the national and company levels as well as the identification of the gaps in currently used methods.This is based on a consistent and common theoretical framework to identify the main factors, forces and indicators that are needed for each analysis level.An analytical framework was used to identify Key Performance Areas (KPA) of the logistics sector for alternative levels of analysis (government, logistics industry (third party service providers- 3PL)). Based on this, existing methodologies and measures were reviewed and analysed on macro- level (national level) and micro-level (company level).The obstacles concerning detailed and comparable statistical data of the logistics sector analysed in chapter 2 were taken into account. These findings are structured and assessed and best practises for different levels are identified. All these are incorporated and concrete proposals concerning the improvement of logistic performance measurement are provided. These recommendations provide references for the concrete evaluation and comparisons of the performance of the logistics sector analysed in chapter 2.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:[สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
5. Best Practices and Performance indicators
Introduction 5.1
Performance of the Transport and logistics Sector has been mentioned several times in the previous Chapters (Ch.2.6 and 4.7). However, data gathering is still challenging. Often, operations and performance are not monitored and reported, both on national and sector / company level. Therefore, this Task of the Study focused on the review and Analysis of existing methods used to Assess logistical Performance at the National and Company levels as well as the Identification of the gaps in currently used methods.
This is based on a consistent and common theoretical Framework. to Identify the Main factors, Forces and indicators that are needed for each level Analysis.
An analytical Framework was used to Identify Key Performance Areas (KPA) of the logistics for Alternative levels of Sector Analysis (Government, Industry logistics (third party Providers- Service. 3PL)). Based on this, existing methodologies and measures were reviewed and analyzed on Macro- level (National level) and Micro-level (Company level).
The obstacles Concerning the logistics of detailed and comparable Statistical Data Sector analyzed in Chapter 2 were taken Into Account. These findings are structured and assessed and best practises for different levels are identified. All these are incorporated and concrete proposals concerning the improvement of logistic performance measurement are provided. These recommendations provide references for the concrete evaluation and comparisons of the performance of the logistics sector analysed in chapter 2.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:[สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
5. Performance indicators and best practices

5.1 Introduction Performance of the transport and logistics sector has been. Mentioned several times in the previous chapters (Ch.2.6 and 4.7). However data gathering, is still challenging, Often,. Operations and performance are not monitored, and reported both on national and sector / company, Therefore level.This task of the study focused on the review and analysis of existing methods used to assess logistical performance at. The national and company levels as well as the identification of the gaps in currently used methods.
This is based on a. Consistent and common theoretical framework to identify the main factors forces and, indicators that are needed for each. Analysis level.
.An analytical framework was used to identify Key Performance Areas (KPA) of the logistics sector for alternative levels. Of analysis (government logistics, industry (third party service providers - 3PL)). Based on this existing methodologies,, And measures were reviewed and analysed on macro - level (national level) and micro-level (company level).
.The obstacles concerning detailed and comparable statistical data of the logistics sector analysed in Chapter 2 were taken. Into account. These findings are structured and assessed and best practises for different levels are identified. All these. Are incorporated and concrete proposals concerning the improvement of logistic performance measurement are provided.These recommendations provide references for the concrete evaluation and comparisons of the performance of the logistics. Sector analysed in Chapter 2.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
 
ภาษาอื่น ๆ
การสนับสนุนเครื่องมือแปลภาษา: กรีก, กันนาดา, กาลิเชียน, คลิงออน, คอร์สิกา, คาซัค, คาตาลัน, คินยารวันดา, คีร์กิซ, คุชราต, จอร์เจีย, จีน, จีนดั้งเดิม, ชวา, ชิเชวา, ซามัว, ซีบัวโน, ซุนดา, ซูลู, ญี่ปุ่น, ดัตช์, ตรวจหาภาษา, ตุรกี, ทมิฬ, ทาจิก, ทาทาร์, นอร์เวย์, บอสเนีย, บัลแกเรีย, บาสก์, ปัญจาป, ฝรั่งเศส, พาชตู, ฟริเชียน, ฟินแลนด์, ฟิลิปปินส์, ภาษาอินโดนีเซี, มองโกเลีย, มัลทีส, มาซีโดเนีย, มาราฐี, มาลากาซี, มาลายาลัม, มาเลย์, ม้ง, ยิดดิช, ยูเครน, รัสเซีย, ละติน, ลักเซมเบิร์ก, ลัตเวีย, ลาว, ลิทัวเนีย, สวาฮิลี, สวีเดน, สิงหล, สินธี, สเปน, สโลวัก, สโลวีเนีย, อังกฤษ, อัมฮาริก, อาร์เซอร์ไบจัน, อาร์เมเนีย, อาหรับ, อิกโบ, อิตาลี, อุยกูร์, อุสเบกิสถาน, อูรดู, ฮังการี, ฮัวซา, ฮาวาย, ฮินดี, ฮีบรู, เกลิกสกอต, เกาหลี, เขมร, เคิร์ด, เช็ก, เซอร์เบียน, เซโซโท, เดนมาร์ก, เตลูกู, เติร์กเมน, เนปาล, เบงกอล, เบลารุส, เปอร์เซีย, เมารี, เมียนมา (พม่า), เยอรมัน, เวลส์, เวียดนาม, เอสเปอแรนโต, เอสโทเนีย, เฮติครีโอล, แอฟริกา, แอลเบเนีย, โคซา, โครเอเชีย, โชนา, โซมาลี, โปรตุเกส, โปแลนด์, โยรูบา, โรมาเนีย, โอเดีย (โอริยา), ไทย, ไอซ์แลนด์, ไอร์แลนด์, การแปลภาษา.

Copyright ©2025 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: