The issue of whether the employer will get damaged from the resignation that regulation or deduction pay insurance deduction to work or not. Consideration has, in many cases, as follows: - Sue waste if not calling up notice by law officer (as sinchang instead of notice). In this case, the law does not require that an employer can sue to retrieve because section 17 is defined only if the employer is a party dismiss contract hire centres. If the employee has not been assigned a faction says contract hire. Sue Sue has not been issues. - Sue get damaged. In case of illegal employment contract or regulations about resigning. As a result, employers have been corrupted. As Sue called damage in breach of contract can sue or get damaged. Sue called the damage must be able to prove, that the resignation of employees. Cause damage to the employer, how is sufficiently mean work for cash or goods are damaged or not is up to baht ..... Stylish Silver Spring does not damage a ............ And as a result directly from employees leaving the wrong regulation. If the employer is unable to prove the damage. The Court cannot determine the damage, as a result, the Court might be raised to accuse. Some employers may define adjusted interest in employment contracts or regulations. In case of resignation in the wrong regulations. The employer can sue the contract but determines the interest or damage, it must consider the job description, position, responsibilities and other elements of damage, or because conditions may vary, or some position may not have any impact on the employer at all. If the employee quit. If this happens, adjust the allowances or the value assignment is damaged it may not assign or pawn, or damage may be unfair contracts. To determine premiums or damage In case of leaving the mess error Most often used with major responsibilities or positions that affect, or may cause damage to. The issue of whether to pay or allowance shall work?. This issue is quite clear in the text of the law is not deductible on both cases. Because the damage from the wrong contract or breach of contract, but the case is different with the wage debt category. The employer is not able to erase the debt. If there is an actual fault and damage. The employer must sue get damage removed themselves. The employer is obliged to deduct pay legal wages employees. Specific action only under the law with the exception of the lovely (see in the Labour Protection Act section 76. ) Insurance work objective is to damage insurance. Due to work on the position of law. Damages in case of non-regulation error leaving damage an LCD/Plasma to work. Employers are not entitled to make insurance deduction to pay for the damage.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
