Comparative public administration, in method and in content, has not successfully integrated with
the main field of public administration, to the detriment of both. With globalization and changes
in information technology, the current separation impairs public administration education. This
assessment is based on a literature review and an appraisal of the contributions of comparative
scholarship. Suggestions for future research strategies promote viable, integrative, and relevant
cross-cultural studies. They emphasize (1) the utilization of cooperative teams of researchers instead
of individual efforts; (2) the use of multi-case analysis instead of the traditional single-case
approach; (3) improvement of the definition and verification of cultural influences on administration;
and (4) expansion of middle-range analysis to examine specific administrative practices
across national boundaries as a strategy for enhancing relevance
Comparative public administration, in method and in content, has not successfully integrated withthe main field of public administration, to the detriment of both. With globalization and changesin information technology, the current separation impairs public administration education. Thisassessment is based on a literature review and an appraisal of the contributions of comparativescholarship. Suggestions for future research strategies promote viable, integrative, and relevantcross-cultural studies. They emphasize (1) the utilization of cooperative teams of researchers insteadof individual efforts; (2) the use of multi-case analysis instead of the traditional single-caseapproach; (3) improvement of the definition and verification of cultural influences on administration;and (4) expansion of middle-range analysis to examine specific administrative practicesacross national boundaries as a strategy for enhancing relevance
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..

Comparative Public Administration, in method and in content, has not successfully Integrated with
the main field of Public Administration, to the detriment of both. With globalization and changes
in information Technology, the current Separation impairs Public Education Administration. This
Assessment is based on a literature review and an Appraisal of the contributions of Comparative
scholarship. Suggestions for Future Research Strategies promote viable, integrative, and relevant
cross-Cultural Studies. They emphasize (1) the utilization of Cooperative Teams of researchers instead
of individual efforts; (2) the use of Multi-Case Analysis instead of the traditional single-Case
approach; (3) Improvement of the Definition and Verification of Cultural influences on Administration;
and (4) Expansion of MIDDLE-Range Analysis to examine specific administrative Practices
Across boundaries As a National Strategy for enhancing relevance.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..

Comparative, public administration in method and in content has not, successfully integrated with
the main field of public. Administration to the, detriment of both. With globalization and changes
in information technology the current, separation. Impairs public administration education. This
assessment is based on a literature review and an appraisal of the contributions. Of comparative
.Scholarship. Suggestions for future research strategies promote viable integrative and,, relevant
cross-cultural studies.? They emphasize (1) the utilization of cooperative teams of researchers instead
of individual efforts; (2) the use of multi-case. Analysis instead of the traditional single-case
approach;(3) improvement of the definition and verification of cultural influences on administration;
and (4) expansion of middle-range. Analysis to examine specific administrative practices
across national boundaries as a strategy for enhancing relevance.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
