In the figure, COP is increased aft

In the figure, COP is increased after the controller is turned on and system goes to another steady-state without severely unstable behavior. Fig. 5(b) shows the response of cooling capacity in the same experiment with that of Fig. 5(a). In both figures, the controlled parameters do not diverge or behave unstably. The increase of COP can be explained by ratio of the increments of cooling capacity and compressor power consumption. As stated, the cooling capacity of the system is maintained at constant value 5 kW but ‘specific’ cooling capacity of refrigerant varies according to change of pressure, temperature and mass flow rate. In the case of Fig. 5, the expansion valve opening changes from 11.6% to some controlled value and finally the opening was reduced to about 10.95% (Fig. 5(d)) and gas-cooler pressure was upraised (Fig. 6).
นรูป COP จะเพิ่มขึ้นหลังจากควบคุมเปิดและระบบจะคงที่อื่น โดยไม่มีพฤติกรรมรุนแรงที่ไม่เสถียร ภาพที่ 5 ( b ) แสดงให้เห็นการตอบสนองความเย็นความจุในการทดลองเดียวกันกับที่ของภาพที่ 5 ( ) ทั้งในตัวเลข , ควบคุมพารามิเตอร์ไม่แตกต่าง หรือทำตัว unstably .การเพิ่มขึ้นของตำรวจ สามารถอธิบายได้ โดยสัดส่วนของการเพิ่มขึ้นของการผลิตและการใช้พลังงานคอมเพรสเซอร์ทำความเย็น ตามที่ระบุไว้ , ความเย็นความจุของระบบจะยังคงที่กิโลวัตต์มีค่าคงที่ 5 แต่ ' เฉพาะ ' เย็นความจุของสารทําความเย็นที่แตกต่างกันไปตามการเปลี่ยนแปลงของความดัน อุณหภูมิและอัตราการไหลของมวล ในกรณีของรูปที่ 5 การขยายตัววาล์วเปิดการเปลี่ยนแปลงจาก 116 % เพื่อควบคุมค่าและในที่สุดก็เปิดตัวได้ลดลงไปประมาณ 10.95 % ( ภาพที่ 5 ( D ) และความดันแก๊สเย็นเป็น upraised ( ภาพที่ 6 )

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

In the figure, COP is increased after the controller is turned on and system goes to another steady-state without severely unstable behavior. Fig. 5 (b) shows the response of cooling capacity in the same experiment with that of Fig. 5 (a. ). In both figures, the controlled parameters do not diverge or behave unstably. The increase of COP can be explained by ratio of the increments of cooling capacity and compressor power consumption. As stated, the cooling capacity of the system is maintained at constant value. 5 kW but 'specific' cooling capacity of refrigerant varies according to change of pressure, temperature and mass flow rate. In the case of Fig. 5, the expansion valve opening changes from 11.6% to some controlled value and finally the opening was reduced to. about 10.95% (Fig. 5 (d)) and gas-cooler pressure was upraised (Fig. 6).
The COP will increase after the launch control system will continue elsewhere. Without violence unstable picture 5 (b) shows the response of cooling capacity in the same experiment as that of Figure 5 (a) the number, the control parameter is different or behave unstably. Adding. the police Can be explained The proportion of the increase in the production and consumption of refrigeration compressors. As stated, the cooling capacity of the system is maintained at a constant 5 kW, but 'only' cooling capacity of the cooling that varies according to the change of pressure. Temperature and mass flow rate. In the case of Figure 5, the expansion valve change from 116% to control and eventually launch has been reduced by about 10.95% (Figure 5 (D), and the gas cooler is upraised (Figure 6. )

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

In the figure COP is, increased after the controller is turned on and system goes to another steady-state without severely. Unstable behavior. Fig. 5 (b) shows the response of cooling capacity in the same experiment with that of Fig. 5 (a). In both. Figures the controlled, parameters do not diverge or behave unstably.The increase of COP can be explained by ratio of the increments of cooling capacity and compressor power consumption. As. Stated the cooling, capacity of the system is maintained at constant value 5 kW but 'specific cooling capacity of refrigerant.' Varies according to change, of pressure temperature and mass flow rate. In the case of Fig. 5 the expansion, valve opening. Changes from 11.6% to some controlled value and finally the opening was reduced to about 10.95% (Fig. 5 (d) and gas-cooler pressure was. Upraised (Fig. 6).
.The COP will increase after the open control system and are fixed. Without a violent behavior, unstable image 5 (b) shows the response capacity in the same cold experiment of the image 5. ) both in numbers,Control parameters are different, or be unstably. The increase of the police can be explained. The proportion of the increase of production and energy use, as described, the refrigeration compressorThe cooling capacity of the system will remain constant. 5 but 'only' cooling capacity of the vapor cleaning the cooler to vary according to the change of pressure. Temperature and mass flow rate in the case of Figure 5.116% to control values, and finally released has dropped to about 10.95% (picture 5 (D) and pressure gas cooler is upraised (Picture 6).