All the ignorance in which this may be ignorance of the law or do not know the facts. But if there is a case that if someone dies and his relatives that he did not know whether he has the power to treasure those dead. The reason is that if we allow an excuse.
.When there is a lawsuit in court, it is necessary to trace through knowledge and do not know the law. A practical algorithm to end any doubt, just not to the exact path for its successor to that he should have informed the national statistics. The law required it to disallow the successor does not know the law quite
. In a footnote at the end of the Supreme Court verdict 209/129. This message contains a description of the main subject is a misunderstanding that it has to raise the understanding of the law is not an excuse. As a result, that if allowed to excuse this text. Their understanding of the law was to blame, everyone has dropped the law is not required. Everybody do as he likes.* To raise the understanding of the law is not an excuse come proverbs Roman law. "
. However, there are cases where if you don't accept, listen to ignorance the law, then it may be unfair to section 64 of criminal code and thus allows an excuse? Considering the condition of guilt means that (Mala prohibita) not guilty in themselves (mala in se) refers to the specific cases dealing criminals, such as aliens, just arriving in the country. People who are very remote locations could not be aware of the laws that are enacted. The Court could provide testimony and evidence are presented. If the Court believes ignorance, law court may reduce the penalty, the offense has penalties reduced, but whether or not the Court will not be punished at all.
.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..