ฉันต้องการเป็นผู้หญิงที่ดีกว่า

ฉันต้องการเป็นผู้หญิงที่ดีกว่า

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

I want to be a better woman

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

I want to be a better woman

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

Reviewer 2 ReportThe exclusion criteria apply to bibliographic sources that have been selected by fulfilling the inclusion criteria, thus it is not correct that the exclusion criteria are the opposite of the inclusion criteria, because it is a condition that is applied after the inclusion criteria has been fulfilled.My recommendation is to delete or reformulate the exclusion criteria for “intervention” and “studies” on the same grounds.About table 2In the table on page 1 of 29, the first column names the evaluated aspect. This term is in the same line as the article information.In contrast, the aspects "available resources" and "evaluation evidence support" on page 2 of 29 appear as headings in the next line.If this is the same table, I consider that this change of formatting may be confusing and therefore propose that the terms "a" and "e" appear at the beginning of the corresponding line.Author ResponseResponse to Reviewer 2 Comments