For Thailand The concept of sovereignty has held up since the reform of King Rama V and King Rama 5, but the source of power remains the crown until the Rs 130 concept of the sovereignty of the people. Thus began the effort revolutionary government of the monarch, but without success. Until twenty years later This has created a figurative clear up after the change of government from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy, the king in 2475, which has made the source or sources of sovereignty in ruling the country. The change from the king down to the people of Thailand to anyone. As shown in Section 1 of the Constitution Act governing the Kingdom (temporary) Act 2475 that "the supremacy of the country belongs to all people" but by the political struggle between political groups in the old regime. The popular group of modern democratic politics with Thailand after the change of government in 2475, also made the concept of the sovereignty of the people was ambiguity in the ownership status of sovereignty of the people. The next edition of the Constitution of Thailand each edition (17th edition) has modified the text to look into the matter. "Sovereignty comes from the people of Thailand ...", thus interpreting that concept. Despite the public as a source of power. But it raises the maximum power that the king had to use that power through the Cabinet, Parliament and the courts because sovereignty belongs to the people then. King could not use that power by the people nor offer them. For this reason, the ownership status of sovereignty of the people watching fade. The change of sovereignty "of" or "derived from" the public, anyway. This ambiguity, which has led to the consecration last night prerogative. Political movements in Thailand Which is contrary to the principle of sovereignty of the people is very important. Because of that public ownership of sovereignty, a right that no one can take it away (unalienable rights), so they can not reinstate it to anyone do that.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..