สมศรีสามารถเข้าใจถึงนัยยะ หรือ impl

สมศรีสามารถเข้าใจถึงนัยยะ หรือ implicature ที่สมชายพูด(Somchai’s utterance contains an implicature) ดังนั้นนัยยะก็คือ ข้อสรุปที่เราได้จากสิ่งที่คนต้องการจะสื่อ(ที่ไม่ได้เกิดจากความหมายตรงตัว หรือ literal meaning) เราสามารถ draw an inference อย่างนี้ได้เนื่องจากเราเข้าใจ กฎเกณฑ์ของการสนทนา ว่าคนจะให้ความร่วมมือกันในการสนทนาเพื่อให้เกิดการสื่อสาร (the Cooperative Principle) นัยยะ (implicature) มีหลายชนิดแต่ที่จะกล่าวต่อไปนี้เป็นนัยยะที่เกี่ยวข้องกับ Grice’s Maximนัยยะที่เกิดจาก Maxim of Relevance (Implicature Based on the Maxim of Relevance) ตัวอย่างของ ข้อสรุป (an inference) หรือนัยยะ (implicature) ที่เกิดจากความเข้าใจว่า คนต้องเคารพกฎ maxim of relevance ก็คือข้อ (2b) ข้างต้น สิ่งที่สมชายพูดไม่เกี่ยวกับร้านกาแฟ ดูเหมือนจะพูดไม่ตรงประเด็นของบทสนทนา แต่เราก็เชื่อว่า ทุกคนเคารพ maxim of relevance ดังนั้นสิ่งที่สมชายพูดจะต้องเกี่ยวข้องกับร้านกาแฟ คือ ร้านที่มุมถนนที่สมชายไปบ่อยๆ ก็คือ ร้านกาแฟ นัยยะที่เกิดจาก Maxim of Quantity (Implicature based on the Maxim of Quantity)
3. สมศรี: ทำการบ้านเสร็จทุกวิชาแล้วยัง
สมชาย:ผมทำวิชาภาษาอังกฤษเสร็จแล้ว
ประโยค “ผมทำวิชาภาษาอังกฤษเสร็จแล้ว” literal meaning ของมัน ไม่ได้มีความหมาย หรือ entail ได้ว่า วิชาอื่นยังไม่เสร็จ แต่สมศรีก็สามารถ เข้าใจนัยยะ (implicature) ว่า “วิชาอื่นยังไม่เสร็จ” สมศรีสามารถสรุปดังกล่าว (make an inference) ได้เพราะเชื่อว่า สมชายต้องเคารพ maxim of quantity เพราะถ้าวิชาอื่นเสร็จสมชายก็ต้องบอกว่า วิชาอื่นก็เสร็จด้วย นัยยะที่เกิดจาก the Maxim of Manner (Implicature based on the Maxim of Manner)
4. ผู้หญิงที่อยู่บ้านเดียวกับผมเป็นครู ผู้ฟังสามารถสรุปได้ว่า “ผู้หญิง” ในประโยคข้อ (4) นัยยะ (implicature) ของคำว่า “ผู้หญิง” คงไม่ใช่ภรรยา แน่ เพราะถ้าเป็น ภรรยา ผู้พูดก็คงจะพูดตรงๆเลยว่า “ภรรยาผมเป็นครู” ดังนั้นผู้ฟังจึงเชื่อว่าผู้พูดต้องเคารพ maxim of manner คือ “Be brief” และก็ “avoid ambiguity” นัยยะที่เกิดจาก the Maxim of Quality (Implicature based on the Maxim of Quality)
5. สมศรี: เราต้องการคนรับผิดชอบเตรียมผัดไทยสำหรับงานคืนนี้
สมชาย:ผมทำผัดไทยสูตรอร่อยของบ้านผมได้
สมศรี เข้าใจ นัยยะ (implicature) ที่สมชายพูด และสามารถอนุมาณได้ว่า สมชายต้องเคยทำผัดไทยสูตรของบ้าน
เขามาก่อน ทั้งที่ประโยคที่สมชายพูดไม่ได้ มีความหมาย (literal meaning หรือ entailment) ว่าเขาเคยทำมาก่อน
แต่สมศรีเชื่อว่า สมชายเคารพ the maxim of quality เพราะเชื่อว่าถ้าไม่มีหลักฐานพอ (คือเคยทำมาก่อน) สมชายคงไม่พูดประโยคนั้น

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

Dana can understand words spoken at the edge or implicature Jones (Somchai utterance contains an implicature) is so significant, it is the conclusion that we were going by what people want is the media (that were not caused by the direct or literal meaning), we can draw an inference, because we understand. The rules of conversation that people will cooperate in discussions to achieve a communication (the Cooperative Principle) there are several words (implicature) type, but the following are significant going on related to the words ya Grice Maxim of Relevance from Maxim (Based on the Maxim of Relevance Implicature) is an example of a synopsis (an inference) or?The words (implicature) is caused by the understanding that people must respect the rules of the maxim of relevance, (2b) above. What does John talk about the coffee shop. It seems to be saying is not exactly an issue of dialogue, but we also believe that everyone respect the maxim of relevance, so something will have to be involved with Jones saying the coffee shop is a shop at the corner, it is impossible to frequent street coffee maker caused significant Quantity of Maxim (based on the Maxim of Quantity Implicature)3. finish all Department Dana: homework,Jones: I do English finished.The sentence "I have finished making English" the literal meaning of it. Not mean or entail that the major unfinished but other Dana was able to grasp the words (implicature) "other subjects have not yet finished." Dana can summarize them (make an inference) is because they believe that Somchai must be respectful of another maxim quantity if the Department completed another impossible, say the Department was completed. Words from the Maxim of going Manner (based on the Maxim of Manner Implicature)4. women who are in the same House I was a teacher. Listeners can be summarized as "the woman" in the sentence (4) words (implicature) of the word "women", not sure if it is my wife, my wife, she would say, "my wife is a breakfast that the teacher", so to speak, so listeners believe must Be respectful of the maxim of manner "," brief "and" avoid ambiguity resulting from the increasing range of Maxim Quality (based on the Maxim of Quality Implicature)5. Dana: we want the people responsible for preparing stir Thailand for work tonight.Jones: I pad I have a delicious recipe of Thailand.Dana understand words spoken (implicature) is created and can be permitted to come onto that Somchai must've done stir Thailand's home.His first two sentences that simply say no. Meaning (literal meaning or entailment) that he has ever done before. But Dana believes that respect for the maxim of quality simply because they believe that if there is not enough evidence (that is, never made before). Jones wouldn't say a sentence.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

Missy can understand the implications or implicature Somchai said, (Somchai's utterance contains an implicature) is so significant. We have concluded that what people want is the media (which is not due to the direct or literal meaning) we can draw an inference that because we understand this. Rules of conversation That people will cooperate together in dialogue to communicate (the Cooperative Principle) implies (implicature) There are many species that are said to be significantly associated with Grice's Maxim implications resulting from Maxim of. Relevance (Implicature Based on the Maxim of Relevance) example of conclusion (an inference) or implication (implicature) that comes from understanding that. People have to respect the rules, it is the maxim of relevance (2b) above what John said about the coffee shop. It seems to say, is not the point of the conversation. But we also believe that everyone respect the maxim of relevance, so what John said is closely related to the coffee shop is a shop on the street corner where Somchai to frequent the cafe implications resulting from Maxim of Quantity (Implicature based on the Maxim of. Quantity)
3. Missy: homework in all subjects, but also
John: I do English finished
the sentence. "I do English, then" literal meaning does not entail meaningful or that of another unfinished. But Missy was able to understand the implications (implicature) that "other subjects unfinished" Missy can conclude that (make an inference) not believing. Somchai must respect the maxim of quantity because if subjects had completed Somchai said. Other subjects also completed a Implications arising from the Maxim of Manner (Implicature based on the Maxim of Manner)
4. Women who stay home with me as a teacher. Listeners can conclude that the "woman" in the clause (4) implies (implicature) of the word "gay" was not the wife, because a wife who would speak honestly say that. "My wife is a teacher," so the audience believes that the talks must respect the maxim of manner is "Be brief" and "avoid ambiguity" implications arising from the Maxim of Quality (Implicature based on the Maxim of Quality)
5. Missy: We want the people responsible for preparing fried Thailand tonight
John: I do, I have a recipe of fried Thailand
Missy understand the implications (implicature) and can say that John Petty at that. Somchai, Thailand fried recipes have been made ​​of
him before. Somchai said the sentence was not significant (literal meaning or entailment) that he had done before
, but Missy believe Somchai respect the maxim of quality because they believe that if there is enough evidence. (Ie had done before) Somchai did not say that.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

Somsri can understand the implications or implicature that Somchai said (Somchai 's utterance contains an implicature) so the significance is. The conclusion we get from what people want to convey meaning (which is not caused by direct or literal meaning), we can draw an inference.The rules of conversation. That people will cooperate in the discussion to achieve communication (the Cooperative Principle) implications (implicature) have many kinds, but the following hinting related. Grice 's Maxim implications arising from the Maxim of Relevance (Implicature Based.The Maxim of Relevance) examples of the conclusion (an inference) or implications (implicature) arising from the understanding that people have to respect the rules. Maxim of relevance is an (2b) above. What Somchai said has nothing to do with the coffee shop. Seem to say irrelevance of the dialogue.Everyone respects maxim of relevance so that the Somchai said must be related to the coffee shop is a shop that มุมถนนที่ Somchai often go is The coffee shop. Implications arising from the Maxim of Quantity (Implicature based on the Maxim of Quantity)
.3. Somsri: finish the homework every subject and
Somchai: I do English finished
.The sentence "I do English finished." literal meaning it means nothing, or entail that other subjects not yet. But somsri can. Understand the implication (implicature). "In other unfinished" somsri can conclude such (make an inference).Somchai must respect maxim of quantity because if other subjects completed Somchai I must say that the other subject is completed. Implications arising from the Maxim, of? Manner (Implicature based on the Maxim of Manner)
.4.The woman the same house as I is a teacher. Listeners can conclude that "woman" in the sentence number (4) implies (implicature period) of the word "girl". Not his wife, because if it is, the wife, the speaker would be straightforward. "My wife is a teacher."Maxim of manner is "Be brief" and "avoid ambiguity." the implications arising from the the Maxim of Quality (Implicature based on the Maxim. Of Quality)
.5. Somsri: we want responsible for preparing noodles for tonight
Somchai: I do Pad Thai recipe home I
somsri understand implications (implicature). The man said, and can be conservative about that man must have noodles recipe of the house!Him before. Both sentences Somchai said doesn't mean (literal meaning or entailment) that he had done it before
แต่ somsri believe. Somchai respect the maxim of quality believe that if there is no enough evidence (that is, had done before), Somchai wouldn't say that!