Almost every organization, whether private or public sector, State enterprises have introduced the hypothesis that sustainable economic theory in the theory of Group 3 legs, according to the Organization's core (OD) troubleshooting no shortage of personnel, especially the executives of retirement age is set to continue, with government officials, the judiciary and the public prosecutor. 10 years in the position of Senior Attorney and senior judge. The private section after which the employee reached the age of retirement, termination will be made by the Organization, compensation fund, as well as living benefits, base pay while they were based on the rules and regulations regarding work, based on seniority made it OK to hire. By contract, for a period of employment is one year, starting each pay benefits according to age, a new job, most of which will be given at a rate that is lower than the former for several reasons. One reason is that not quite age less than ever. The reason for retirement, renewal or new employment contract with the temporary employment, benefits to retirees, employees and organisations to benefit both parties. In part, the employee will receive ongoing revenue could be the impairment. With better health, mental health, body Mental health is not broken down, because there is still a job to do. Private enterprise will benefit from that experience can still be harvested from the executives who buy no. It also is preparing to pick up the replacement with a trainer, with the management of new people. But it is not a smooth, because the problem often happens obviously is not the incentive to hire new employees and the Organization Department. as follows:1. an employee must pay to get the same benefits as the original made by seniority seniority counts consistently.2. the Organization must pay compensation only once. Do not want to pay compensation twice, both times when the first retirement due to age and time when the contract here last time. From the enterprise to extend the duration of the employee's own retirement or retirement age of staff immediately canceled? There are advantages disadvantages? To answer .... along the judgment the Supreme Court judgment 2552 (2009)/5481 and Supreme 2928/2528 (1985)Aging retirement of an employee as defined in the properties of the employee organization will hire that will need to be no more than a few years. It will be an employee of an organization. The Organization did not neglect or ignore employee termination that has reached the retirement age as defined in the regulations, it's treated as a change to the conditions of employment as an officer (comparable judgment the Supreme Court retirement age specified 5481/2552 (2009) employee, later regarded as changing the conditions of employment that are not your employees. Not applicable.) Therefore, if such an organization can extend the duration of an employee's retirement, or even cancel, the age of retirement of the employee. As an organization, it is deemed appropriate to the employee more than the Labor Relations Act (b.e. 2518, section 20, "when the condition of the hire agreement is valid. Prohibiting employers hiring labor contracts with employees or with the conditions of hire agreements, unless the employment contract that workers will be more than your employees "), which will result in a benefit to the Organization to adjust pay bonuses to employees in accordance with regulations and policies.Dim and remain current payroll after retirement, as well as the welfare renewal that employees receive are still based on the original. The wage of the employee base, and thus the calculation of benefits would be higher rates, for example, the base compensation paid in bonuses. The base pay for overtime, as well as the base of calculation stopped fund raising ... When the organization terminated employees when fully renewed retirement, the employee will receive compensation, as well as the benefit it more because the calculation base. The employee does not lose the benefit but get more than ever before, despite the prolonged retirement according to the instructions of the organization. The employee will receive compensation at once because I was terminated once by. However, the retirement age of employees expanded by one party of an organization even according to the law. But if he doesn't want to be sustainable with the employees, the Organization has become a force that is likely to result in damage to the Organization, more than any other resource, which may be more under the control of the Organization's employees, it is not sustainable. ดังนั้น กรณีต่ออายุเกษียณของพนักงาน องค์กรและพนักงานควรจะทำการตกลงกันตามความสมัครใจ ส่วนกรณียกเลิกการเกษียณอายุเอาเสียเลย แม้องค์กรจะสามารถทำได้ตามเหตุผลของกฎหมายดังกล่าวข้างต้น แต่ก็มีข้อเสียคือ เมื่อภายหลังองค์กรตัดสินใจเลิกสัญญาจ้างต่อพนักงานที่ไม่มีข้อจำกัดเรื่องเกษียณอายุแล้ว การเลิกจ้างพนักงานดังกล่าวนี้อาจเป็นการเลิกจ้างโดยไม่เป็นธรรมตามพ.ร.บ.จัดตั้งศาลแรงงานและวิธีพิจารณาคดีแรงงาน พ.ศ.2522 มาตรา 49 และศาลแรงงานอาจมีคำพิพากษาให้องค์กรจ่ายค่าเสียหายกรณีเลิกจ้างโดยไม่เป็นธรรมได้ โดยจ่ายเพิ่มจากการที่ต้องจ่ายค่าชดเชยและสวัสดิการต่างๆไปแล้ว แต่ถ้าหากยังมีเงื่อนไขเกษียณอายุและเลิกจ้างเพราะเหตุเกษียณอายุการเลิกจ้างขององค์กรถือเป็นการเลิกจ้างที่เป็นธรรมแล้วไม่ต้องรับผิดจ่ายค่าเสียหายเทียบเคียงคำพิพากษาฎีกาที่ 2928/2528
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
