Guilty of misappropriation Sufficient funds are as follows:1. possession of someone else's property, or that someone else owns it. Refers to the possession of property by reality. It is also a part owner in the property of another person is to occupy the property owners only. Non-possession for their own proprietary2. it must have possession of the actual property. non-derived, but only based on, for example, the temporary care. It is not considered to occupy the real estate. If it is wrong to focus on the Bangor base thief not to embezzle.3. possession of a security may be provided directly to property owners is delivered to or by implication.4. the acquisition of possession. Must be a voluntary assignment by the owner or representative of the owner and must not have been caused by fraud, delivered. Otherwise, the base stock fraud is wrong.5. possession of a security may not be another victim. If the estate by the action of another victim, not a victim anymore, such as embezzlement or fraud, thief. The stock exchange of Thailand, the kanbans took stock to focus on waste: not guilty of embezzlement in another base.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""