Here is another point, Rudolph Carn

Here is another point, Rudolph Carnap once said that what is logically possible doesn’t mean that we can think of it. What he is pointing out is that there are things that we just can’t psychologically think about or visualize. This is partially what Kant is talking about. The Phenomena are those things that are possible for us to experience and that we do experience, because they are in agreement with our mental structure. The Noumena are those things that are external to us, but we can’t experience them because they don’t fit in with our mental structure. One of the points is that we look in the mirror and see what we take to be our bodies. Now take it that we somehow jump outside of our mental structures and see things as they are, and see how our bodies look at it as the noumena, then would look completely different than what we take it to be.

Let me try to give another loose analogy. Take a new planet that is supposedly discovered by NASA. Now, we can possibly experience it because it fits in with our mental structure. We might not be experiencing it now, but it is within the confines of our mental structure to experience it at some time. This is a Phenomena. But now take something like a new particle similar to that of a quark. We can’t experience this at any time because it doesn’t fit into our mental structure in which we can ever experience it. Now this new particle is logically possible, but it’s not possible for us to experience it because it doesn’t fit into our mental structure to experience it. That means it’s not possible for us to experience. Phenomena are what is possible for us to experience (based on our mental structure), and Noumena are what’s impossible for us to experience (based on our mental structure).

As a side note, Kant said that everything we experience is experienced in space and time. But what Kant said was that what we experience, our mental structure makes it so that it’s experienced in space and time, even if there is no space and time outside of our mental structure. In other words, what we experience, or impinges on our senses from the external world, is adjusted so that it fits into our mental structure. This is how the mind adjusts things for us to have as perceptions, even though what we experience isn’t how they are in the external world.

What Kant is saying is that we don’t’ know what objects are in the external world, and we can’t know. All we know is that there is an external world, not what is out there or what it looks like or any of it’s qualities. With the picture of the Representational theory of perception, the “object” is the noumena. The “perception” is the phenomena, and we experience after our structure of our mind has manipulated things in order to present them to the “perceiver”.

ความเหนื่อยจากการออกกำลังกาย

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

Here is another point, Rudolph Carnap once said that what is logically possible doesn't mean that we can think of it. What he is pointing out is that there are things that we just can't psychologically think about or visualize. This is partially what Kant is talking about. The Phenomena are those things that are possible for us to experience and that we do experience, because they are in agreement with our mental structure. The Noumena are those things that are external to us, but we can't experience them because they don't fit in with our mental structure. One of the points is that we look in the mirror and see what we take to be our bodies. Now take it that we somehow jump outside of our mental structures and see things as they are, and see how our bodies look at it as the noumena, then would look completely different than what we take it to be.

Let me try to give another loose analogy. Take a new planet that is supposedly discovered by NASA. Now, we can possibly experience it because it fits in with our mental structure. We might not be experiencing it now, but it is within the confines of our mental structure to experience it at some time. This is a Phenomena. But now take something like a new particle similar to that of a quark. We can't experience this at any time because it doesn't fit into our mental structure in which we can ever experience it. Now this new particle is logically possible, but it's not possible for us to experience it because it doesn't fit into our mental structure to experience it. That means it's not possible for us to experience. Phenomena are what is possible for us to experience (based on our mental structure), and Noumena are what's impossible for us to experience (based on our mental structure).

As a side note, Kant said that everything we experience is experienced in space and time. But what Kant said was that what we experience, our mental structure makes it so that it's experienced in space and time, even if there is no space and time outside of our mental structure. In other words, what we experience, or impinges on our senses from the external world, is adjusted so that it fits into our mental structure. This is how the mind adjusts things for us to have as perceptions, even though what we experience isn't how they are in the external world.

What Kant is saying is that we don't' know what objects are in the external world, and we can't know. All we know is that there is an external world, not what is out there or what it looks like or any of it's qualities. With the picture of the Representational theory of perception, the "Object" is the "perception" of The noumena. is the phenomena, and we structure our mind after our experience of things in order to present has manipulated them to the "perceiver"

a long workout.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

Here is another point, Rudolph Carnap once said that what is logically possible doesn't mean that we can think of it. What he is pointing out is that there are things that we just can't psychologically think about or visualize. This is partially. what Kant is talking about. The Phenomena are those things that are possible for us to experience and that we do experience, because they are in agreement with our mental structure. The Noumena are those things that are external to us, but we can't. experience them because they don't fit in with our mental structure. One of the points is that we look in the mirror and see what we take to be our bodies. Now take it that we somehow jump outside of our mental structures and see things. as they are, and See How our Bodies Look at it as The Noumena, then would Look completely different than what We Take it to be. Let Me Try to Give another Loose analogy. Take A New Planet that is supposedly discovered by NASA. Now. , we can possibly experience it because it fits in with our mental structure. We might not be experiencing it now, but it is within the confines of our mental structure to experience it at some time. This is a Phenomena. But now take something like. a new particle similar to that of a quark. We can't experience this at any time because it doesn't fit into our mental structure in which we can ever experience it. Now this new particle is logically possible, but it's not possible for. us to experience it because it doesn't fit into our mental structure to experience it. That means it's not possible for us to experience. Phenomena are what is possible for us to experience (based on our mental structure), and Noumena are what's impossible. for U.S. to experience (based on our Mental structure). As A Side note, Kant said that everything We experience is experienced in Space and time. But what Kant said was that what We experience, our Mental structure makes it so that it's experienced in. space and time, even if there is no space and time outside of our mental structure. In other words, what we experience, or impinges on our senses from the external world, is adjusted so that it fits into our mental structure. This is how. Things The Mind adjusts for U.S. to have as perceptions, Even though We experience is not what they are in How The External World. What Kant is saying is that We do not 'know what Objects are in The External World, and We Can. 't know. All we know is that there is an external world, not what is out there or what it looks like or any of it's qualities. With the picture of the Representational theory of perception, the "object" is the noumena. The. "perception" is the phenomena, and we experience after our structure of our mind has manipulated things in order to present them to the "perceiver". exhaustion from exercise

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

Here is another point Rudolph Carnap, once said that what is logically possible doesn 't mean that we can think of it. What He is pointing out is that there are things that we just can 't psychologically think about or visualize. This is partially What Kant is talking about. The Phenomena are those things that are possible for us to experience and that we, do experienceBecause they are in agreement with our mental structure. The Noumena are those things that are external to us but we, Can 't experience them because they don' t fit in with our mental structure. One of the points is that we look in the mirror And see what we take to be our bodies. Now take it that we somehow jump outside of our mental structures and see things As, they areAnd see how our bodies look at it as the noumena then would, look completely different than what we take it to be.

Let Me try to give another loose analogy. Take a new planet that is supposedly discovered by NASA. Now we can, possibly experience It because it fits in with our mental structure. We might not be experiencing, it nowBut it is within the confines of our mental structure to experience it at some time. This is a Phenomena. But now take Something like a new particle similar to that of a quark. We can 't experience this at any time because it doesn t fit into.' Our mental structure in which we can ever experience it. Now this new particle is, logically possibleBut it 's not possible for us to experience it because it doesn' t fit into our mental structure to experience it. That Means it 's not possible for us to experience. Phenomena are what is possible for us to experience (based on our mental structure), And Noumena are what 's impossible for us to experience (based on our mental structure).

As a, side noteKant said that everything we experience is experienced in space and time. But what Kant said was that what, we experience Our mental structure makes it so that it 's experienced in space and time even if, there is no space and time outside of Our mental structure. In, other words what we experience or impinges, on our senses from the, external worldIs adjusted so that it fits into our mental structure. This is how the mind adjusts things for us to have, as perceptions Even though what we experience isn 't how they are in the external world.

What Kant is saying is that we don t know what.' ' Objects are in the external world and we, can 't know. All we know is that there is an, external worldNot what is out there or what it looks like or any of it 's qualities. With the picture of the Representational theory Of perception the ", object." is the noumena. The "perception." is the phenomena and we, experience after our structure of Our mind has manipulated things in order to present them to the "perceiver".

fatigue during exercise