We would not have argued that euthanasia is correct or not ... we know that. Doctors do with altruism Made with real intent Not too lazy to work And measure whether a person is a patient who is hopeless and where. How do submarines No chance of survivors, patients actually being diagnosed or not. Hard effort or There are other treatments or not. Council must give a definition of the word "desperate" to clear out the actual treatment because doctors despair. Or despair, because doctors do not fully work. Or because relatives do not cry "
- "to euthanasia are vulnerable and have been used in the wrong way, like making ill patients, mostly those who have been accidental death then. Organ Sales Or relative killed for inheritance and so society had to check into the matter. Do not leave it to the doctors and patients only. Because it may allow doctors to do something wrong. As extrajudicial Police are armed with the right people who died while being arrested, no one can condone. Likewise The doctor was holding a syringe to the patient's death at any time as extrajudicial active euthanasia. Or killing in another form "
- "If you are legally allowed to do the same abroad. Doctor collides hundred percent I did not give birth Because it is against Buddhist principles vigorously. If not, it is a passive treatment is stopped only. But to be a passive, some doctors still felt that stopping treatment is a sin anyway. Abortion is like a doctor to kill one of them. Please sounded intent is But the fact is that It was a favor or two.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
