Global positioning system (GPS) is a satellite-based structure.For navigation and positioning. It has become the backbone.Of many aspects of our life. GPS has, many applications such.As vehicle navigation recreation marine navigation airborne,,,,Navigation time transfer,,,, rescues mapping and missile guidance.GPS technology offers different positioning techniques.Varying in cost and accuracy. The simple positioning technique.Is called "autonomous positioning," which is the most.Flexible positioning form and is the original positioning technique.That GPS was designed for. However because of, the.Errors caused by satellite ephemerides satellite clock,,Ionosphere troposphere multipath,,,,, and noise theA. Farah (B).College of Engineering Aswan University Aswan Egypt,,,,E-mail: ashraf_farah@aswu.edu.eg.Autonomous point positioning provides the user a horizontal.Accuracy of < = 13 m and a vertical accuracy of < = 22 1 m [].To obtain higher accuracy down to the, centimeter levelThe user needs to mitigate the above-mentioned errors using.The spatial correlation between one or more reference stations.With known coordinates and the nearby Rover GPS.Receiver station whose coordinates are to be determined. The.Distance-dependant errors are equal for receivers very close to.One another but as, the distance between, receivers increasesThe relative errors between receivers increase. Site-dependant.Errors like multipath, and, receiver noise are not correlated.With inter-receiver distances. The GPS positioning technique.That uses the concept of spatial correlation is known as differential.GPS (DGPS) []. The 2 limitations for DGPS are as.Follows: the need for a reference station the distance, limitation.Between the rover and reference station (the separation.Between the rover and reference stations in the case of realtime.Kinematic (RTK) is required to be < 20 km while in,,The case of network - based RTK the separation, could allow.Up to 50 km) [], and 2 the need for simultaneous observations.Between the reference and Rover stations which increases, the.Cost of DGPS over autonomous positioning.The PPP technique [] aims 3 at correcting the observations.Errors and overcomes the DGPS limitations. PPP is.An enhanced single-point positioning technique for code or.Phase measurements using precise orbits and clocks instead.Of broadcast data. PPP became viable with the existence of.The extremely precise ephemerides and, clock correctionsOffered by different organizations such as the International.GNSS Service (IGS). IGS has been providing the most precise.Satellite ephemerides and clock corrections currently.Available [4]. To compensate for ionospheric effects (the.Largest source of error for GPS observations), dual-frequency.Measurements are used for an ionosphere-free combination.In the case of single-frequency observations some kind, of.123.2014 Arab J Sci Eng (2015) 40: 2013 - 2019.Ionosphere modeling has to be applied For, better accuracy.PPP users are advised with dual-frequency measurements as.It is the most efficient way of mitigating ionospheric delay.PPP was first developed for use in static applications (for.Example []), 3 and has been studied extensively in recent.Years ([]). 5 - 13 Kinematic PPP is being increasingly used.In research and survey applications with the development.Of, final near-real-time or real-time, satellite orbit and clock.Products. It is used for example, in airborne, and marine.Applications in sparsely, populated regions such as in mountains,,Prairies or regions and, desert, in areas where the GNSS.Infrastructure is poorly developed [] []. 14 and 15 Some references.And results in the field of kinematic PPP are as follows:In [16], tests of kinematic PPP for a vehicle and a helicopter.Were conducted. The results indicate that positioning information.With an accuracy level of 10 cm could be obtained. In.[], GAPS 17 software was used to determine the trajectory of.A boat via kinematic PPP. The results include RMS values of.,, 6.5 5.5 and 13.9 cm for the North East and up components,,,Respectively. In [18], the IGS station SHAO was evaluated in.Kinematic mode on, days 295 296 and 297, of the year 2007.The maximum mean differences were 0.6 3.2 and 4.3 cm,,,For the North East and up components,,, [], In 19 respectively.Seven continuous days (24 h 30 s, observation files) of data for.2 IGS stations were processed using kinematic PPP with the.CSRS-PPP software. Centimetric standard deviations in both.The horizontal and the vertical components were obtained. In.[], the 20 researchers analyzed 14 days of continuous observations.Of a ferry route between Lauvvik and Oanes (Norway).At a 1 Hz observation rate. The comparison of the PPP results.With the reference trajectory computed via differential positioning.Yielded mean error rates of 6.7 and 10.0 cm for the.Horizontal and vertical components respectively. Finally in,,,[], one 21 static station was processed using kinematic PPP.Not taking into account the f.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
