Table 1 Storage, concepts and pract

Table 1 Storage, concepts and practice regarding water safety and diarrhoeal disease from the quantitative individual ques-tionnaire administered in Nelvoy
Water safety and diarrhoea Main village
(n=41)n(%)
Harijan colony
(n=56)n(%)
Total (n=97)
n(%)
P-value
a
Separate storage of drinking water 41 (100) 43 (76.8) 84 (86.6)

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

Table 1 Storage, concepts and practice regarding water safety and diarrhoeal disease from the quantitative individual ques-tionnaire administered in Nelvoy
Water safety and diarrhoea Main village
(n=41)n(%)
Harijan colony
(n=56)n(%)
Total (n=97)
n(%)
P-value
a
Separate storage of drinking water 41 (100) 43 (76.8) 84 (86.6) <0.001
Microbial treatment of drinking water 12 (29.3) 29 (51.8) 41 (42.3) 0.04
Concept of safe water
Clear appearance 13 (31.7) 8 (14.3) 21 (21.6) 0.07
Water from bore well 20 (48.8) 15 (26.8) 35 (36.1) 0.04
No salty taste 3 (7.3) 1 (1.8) 4 (4.1) 0.4
Odourless 2 (4.9) 20 (35.7) 22 (22.7) <0.001
From clean tank 3 (7.3) 12 (21.4) 15 (15.5) 0.10
a
Following Bonferroni adjustment,P-value of <0.002 was considered statistically significant.
ferroni method (Bland and Altman, 1995) was used. After
adjustment, for inferences in this study, aP-value <0.002
was considered to be statistically significant.
3. Results
A total of 179 'general questionnaires' were administered to
one individual from each household in the village and 84.8%
of the households were thus covered. The Harijan colony
had a larger population than the upper caste Main village,
with more households (119 vs. 60) and with a larger mean
family size (4.78±2.12 vs. 4.07±1.99,P=0.03).
Of a total of 110 individuals selected for the individ-ual questionnaire, 97 (88.2%) completed the questionnaire;
41 (42.3%) respondents were from the Main village and 56
(57.7%) from the Harijan colony. The difference in the dis-tribution of the respondent households between the Main
village and the Harijan colony was not statistically signifi-cant (P=0.15). Data from the individual questionnaire are
presented inTables 1—3. From the individual questionnaire,
SES was obtained for 95 (97.9%) individuals. Differences
between the SES in the sample and the entire village were
not significantly different (P=0.46). However, there were
significant differences in the SES of theMain village (P=0.02)
and the SES of the Harijan colony (P=0.003) when compared
separately with that of the entire village. Results from both
questionnaires and focus group discussions are presented
below.
Table 3 Post-defecation hand-washing with soap by age-group in Nelvoy
Age (years) Use soap after
defecation (n=66)
a
n
(%)
Soap not used after
defecation (n=29)
a
n
(%)
<15
b
19 (86.4) 3 (13.6)
15—40 24 (68.6) 11 (31.4)
41—60 20 (66.7) 10 (33.3)
>60
b
3 (37.5) 5 (62.5)
a
Data unavailable for one individual in each group.
b
Between <15 and >60 years, Fisher's exact testP=0.03 (fol-lowing Bonferroni adjustment,P-value of <0.002 was considered
statistically significant).
3.1. Water supply and storage
Ninety-five (97.9%) of the 97 individuals interviewed (and
their households) obtained their water supply from the gov-ernment piped supply, derived fromtwo borewells. Only two
households (in the Harijan colony) had private bore wells.
All openwells and hand pumps, previously important sources
of drinking water of the village, had been dry for almost
5 years. Eighty-four (86.6%) individuals interviewed kept
drinking water separate from water used for other purposes
such as washing vessels and clothes, and for toilet purposes.
Water was stored in steel vessels in 74 (76.3%) households,

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

Table 1 Storage, Concepts and Practice regarding Water Safety and diarrheal disease from The quantitative Individual Ques-Tionnaire Administered in Nelvoy.
Water Safety and diarrhea Main Village
(n = 41) n (%).
Harijan Colony
(n = 56) n (%).
Total (n = 97)
n (%)
P-value
a
Separate Storage of Drinking Water 41 (100) 43 (76.8) 84 (86.6) <0.001.
Microbial Treatment of Drinking Water 12 (29.3) 29 (51.8) 41 (42.3) 12:04.
Concept of Safe Water
Clear appearance 13 (31.7) 8 (14.3) 21 (21.6) .07.
Water from Bore Well 20 (48.8) 15 (26.8) 35 (36.1) 12:04.
No Salty Taste 3 (7.3) 1 (1.8) 4 (4.1. ) 0.4
Odourless 2 (4.9) 20 (35.7) 22 (22.7) <0.001.
From Clean tank 3 (7.3) 12 (21.4) 15 (15.5) twelve ten a.m..
a
Following Bonferroni adjustment, P-value of <0.002 was considered statistically significant.
Ferroni method (Bland and Altman, 1995) was used. After
adjustment, for inferences in this Study, aP-value <0.002.
was considered to be statistically significant.
3. Results
A total of 179 'general questionnaires' were Administered to.
One from Each Individual Household in The Village and 84.8%.
households were thus of The Covered. The Harijan Colony
had a larger than The Upper caste Population Main Village,.
households with more (119 vs. 60) and with a larger mean.
Family size (02.12 ± 4.78 vs. 4.07 ± 1.99, P = 12:03).
Of a total of 110 Individuals Selected for The Individ-UAL questionnaire, 97 (88.2%) The completed questionnaire;
41 (42.3%) respondents were from The Main Village and 56.
(57.7%) from The Harijan Colony. The difference in The Dis-tribution of The respondent households between The Main.
Village and The Harijan Colony was signifi--Cant Not statistically (P = 12:15). The Individual Data from questionnaire are
Presented InTables 1-3. From The Individual questionnaire,
SES was obtained for 95 (97.9%) Individuals. Differences
between The entire SES in The Sample and The Village were.
Not Different significantly (P = 0:46). However, there were
significant SES Differences in The Village of themain (P = 12:02).
and The SES of The Harijan Colony (P = 0.003) When compared.
separately with that of The entire Village. Results from Both
questionnaires and Focus Group discussions are Presented.
Below.
Table 3 Post-defecation Hand-washing with Soap by Age-Group in Nelvoy.
Age (years) Use Soap After.
defecation (n = 66)
a
n
(%)
Soap Not Used After
defecation (n = 29)
a
n
(%)
<15
B
19 (86.4) 3 (13.6).
15-40 24 (68.6) 11 (31.4).
41-60 20 (66.7) 10 (33.3).
> 60
B
3 (37.5 ) 5 (62.5)
a
Data Unavailable for One Individual in Each Group.
B
Between <15 and> 60 years, Fisher's exact testp = 0:03 (fol-lowing Bonferroni adjustment, P-value of <0.002 was considered.
statistically significant).
3.1. Water Supply and Storage
Ninety-Five (97.9%) of 97 The Individuals interviewed (and.
their households) obtained their gov-ernment piped Water Supply from The Supply, Derived Fromtwo Borewells. Two only
households (in The Harijan Colony) had Private Bore Wells.
All Openwells and Hand Pumps, Sources previously important.
of Drinking Water of The Village, had been for Almost Dry.
5 years. Eighty-Four (86.6%) kept Individuals interviewed.
separate from Drinking Water Water Used for Other purposes.
Such As Clothes washing and vessels, and for Toilet purposes.
Water was stored in Steel vessels in 74 (76.3%) households,.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

Table 1 Storage concepts and, practice regarding water safety and diarrhoeal disease from the quantitative individual ques-tionnaire. Administered in Nelvoy
Water safety and diarrhoea Main village
(n = 41) n (%)
Harijan colony
(n = 56) n (%)
Total (n = 97)
n (%)


, P-value a Separate Storage of drinking water 41 (100) 43 (76.8) 84 (86.6) < 0.001
Microbial treatment of drinking water 12 (29.3) 29 (51.8) 41 (42.3) 0.04
Concept of safe water
Clear appearance 13 (31.7) 8 (14.3) 21 (21.6) 0.07
Water from bore well 20 (48.8) 15 (26.8) 35 (36.1). 0.04
No salty taste 3 (7.3) 1 (1.8) 4 (4.1) 0.4
Odourless 2 (4.9) 20 (35.7) 22 (22.7) < 0.001
From clean tank 3 (7.3) 12 (21.4) 15 (15.5). 0.10

Following, a Bonferroni adjustment P-value of < 0.002 was considered statistically significant.
.Ferroni method (Bland and Altman 1995), was used. After
adjustment for inferences, in, this study aP-value < 0.002
was considered. To be statistically significant.

3. Results A total of 179 'general questionnaires' were administered to
one individual. From each household in the village and 84.8%
of the households were thus covered. The Harijan colony
.Had a larger population than the upper caste, Main village
with more households (119 vs. 60) and with a larger mean
family. Size (4.78 edge 2.12 vs. 4.07, edge 1.99 P = 0.03).
Of a total of 110 individuals selected for the, individ-ual questionnaire 97 (88.2%). Completed the questionnaire;
41 (42.3%) respondents were from the Main village and 56
(57.7%) from the Harijan colony.The difference in the dis-tribution of the respondent households between the Main
village and the Harijan colony was not. Statistically signifi-cant (P = 0.15). Data from the individual questionnaire are
presented inTables 1 - 3. From the individual. Questionnaire
SES, was obtained for 95 (97.9%) individuals. Differences
between the SES in the sample and the entire village. Were
.Not significantly different (P = 0.46). However there, were
significant differences in the SES of theMain Village (P = 0.02)
and. The SES of the Harijan colony (P = 0.003) when compared
separately with that of the entire village. Results from both
questionnaires. And focus group discussions are presented
.
below Table 3 Post-defecation hand-washing with soap by age-group in Nelvoy
.Age (years) Use soap after
defecation (n = 66)


a n (%)
Soap not used after
defecation (n = 29)


a n (%)


19 < 15 B (86.4) 3 (13.6)
15 - 40 24 (68.6) 11 (31.4)
41 - 60 20 (66.7) 10 (33.3)


> 60 B 3. (37.5) 5 (62.5)

Data a unavailable for one individual in each group.

B Between < 15 and > 60 years Fisher ', s exact testP = 0.03. (fol-lowing, Bonferroni adjustment P-value of < 0.002 was considered
.Statistically significant).
3.1. Water supply and storage
Ninety-five (97.9%) of the 97 individuals interviewed (and
their. Households) obtained their water supply from the gov-ernment piped supply derived fromtwo, borewells. Only two
households. (in the Harijan colony) had private bore wells.
All openwells and, hand pumps previously important sources
of drinking water. Of, the villageHad been dry for almost
5 years. Eighty-four (86.6%) individuals interviewed kept
drinking water separate from water used. For other purposes
such as washing vessels and clothes and for, toilet purposes.
Water was stored in steel vessels in 74 (76.3%). Households.