00:09In the previous topic, we look

00:09
In the previous topic, we looked at the application of
00:11
emergency management in a legal context in New Zealand,
00:14
which could be seen to be best practise in emergency
00:17
management.
00:18
We're now going to look at the application of emergency
00:21
management in a legal context more generally and some of the
00:24
changes that are occurring within legal approaches to
00:26
emergency management.
00:28
A standard legislative format for emergency management
00:32
outlines the purpose and scope of the legislation.
00:35
This is standard legislative practise.
00:38
But for emergency management, we need to make sure that
00:40
within that context, it is well articulated what we mean
00:43
by emergency management, who it applies to, and what the
00:46
context is for, in this case, the nation, or perhaps state
00:51
within which the legislation's been developed.
00:54
One need to make sure that the terminology is clear and
00:57
consistent for use within that context.
01:03
It should outline which hazards the emergency
01:05
management legislation intends to deal with.
01:09
What are the hazards that are going to be managed by that
01:11
legislation?
01:13
It should then identify roles and responsibilities at
01:17
national, state, local, and organisational level in
01:20
sufficient detail to enable planning to occur.
01:24
It should include a requirement to plan so that
01:27
those who have responsibility will then document that work
01:30
to give it in a collaborative way to ensure that the needs
01:33
of their communities are best met.
01:36
It will usually include a process for
01:38
declaring an emergency.
01:40
Often a declaration of emergency means that more
01:42
resources are made available to those responding.
01:44
But at least we need to make sure the process of doing so
01:46
is clear and unambiguous so that it can happen quickly
01:50
when it needs to.
01:53
It should have provision for emergency powers, so that
01:56
either when a declaration of an emergency is made, or
01:59
sometimes more generally when a situation has arisen where
02:03
clearly those powers are necessary, that those powers
02:05
are outlined and that those who are then going to have
02:08
them during emergencies understand them, that the
02:11
others who they may be directing or acquiring
02:14
resources from understand those powers as well, and that
02:18
the media and communities can understand what
02:19
those powers mean.
02:20
It should, where possible, include at least a transition
02:24
from response to recovery, and ideally include development of
02:29
recovery capabilities, knowledge, practise, and
02:31
appointments.
02:33
At the very least, it should provide for transition from
02:36
response to recovery.
02:41
Events over the last few decades, though, have caused
02:44
us to think about the role of legislation in emergency
02:47
management.
02:49
And the foundations of emergency management,
02:52
previously suggested to be civil
02:54
defence, have been shaken.
02:57
That's brought about legislative changes.
02:59
So we're moving from generic, natural, all-hazards approach,
03:04
to a hazards and risk-based approach.
03:06
So from a generic approach, that means we're prepared for
03:09
anything, whatever comes along, to actually
03:12
understanding the risks that we are really preparing for,
03:14
looking to reduce, respond to, and recover from.
03:20
It's from a response focus to a more comprehensive risk
03:23
management model, about continuity of operations, and
03:26
about building resilience, so moving from response to a
03:30
comprehensive model.
03:32
It's about moving from a top-down command and control
03:35
focused model to more community empowerment and
03:38
coordination across the agencies that are involved in
03:40
emergency management.
03:42
So we're seeing significant changes occurring within
03:45
emergency management.
03:46
Although, the legislative structure will stay the same.
03:50
The content is changing markedly, as we learn lessons
03:53
from emergencies that we have to deal with,
03:56
either at home or abroad.
04:00
So in this topic, we've looked very briefly at a standard
04:03
model for emergency management legislation and some of the
04:06
challenges that are occurring within that legislation as we
04:09
become more aware of what we need to do to be able to meet
04:12
the needs of our communities in a more comprehensive and
04:15
collaborative way into the future.
04:18
In the next topic, we're going to look at the application of
04:21
some of those best practise measures that we talked about
04:24
in an earlier topic, within the context of the Canterbury
04:28
quakes in New Zealand.
04:29
Some very challenging situations were faced by
04:32
organisations and communities in that context that
04:35
reinforced some of the lessons we should have learned in the
04:37
past and have given us an opportunity to be flexible and
04:41
adaptive in our application of legislation to make sure we
04:44
get the best of it, now and then potentially learn lessons
04:48
from it into the future

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

0: 9In the previous topic, we looked at the application of0: 11emergency management in a legal context in New Zealand,0: 14which could be seen to be best practise in emergency0: 17management.0: 18We're now going to look at the application of emergency0: 21management in a legal context more generally and some of the0: 24changes that are occurring within legal approaches to0: 26emergency management.0: 28A standard legislative format for emergency management0: 32outlines the purpose and scope of the legislation.0: 35This is standard legislative practise.0: 38But for emergency management, we need to make sure that0: 40within that context, it is well articulated what we mean0: 43by emergency management, who it applies to, and what the0: 46context is for, in this case, the nation, or perhaps state0: 51within which the legislation's been developed.0: 54One need to make sure that the terminology is clear and0: 57consistent for use within that context.1: 3It should outline which hazards the emergency1: 5management legislation intends to deal with.1: 9What are the hazards that are going to be managed by that1: 11legislation?1: 13 pmIt should then identify roles and responsibilities at1: 17 pmnational, state, local, and organisational level in1: 20sufficient detail to enable planning to occur.1: 24It should include a requirement to plan so that1: 27those who have responsibility will then document that work1: 30to give it in a collaborative way to ensure that the needs1: 33of their communities are best met.1: 36It will usually include a process for1: 38declaring an emergency.1: 40Often a declaration of emergency means that more1: 42resources are made available to those responding.1: 44But at least we need to make sure the process of doing so1: 46is clear and unambiguous so that it can happen quickly1: 50 pmwhen it needs to.1: 53It should have provision for emergency powers, so that1: 56either when a declaration of an emergency is made, or1: 59sometimes more generally when a situation has arisen where2: 3clearly those powers are necessary, that those powers2: 5are outlined and that those who are then going to have2: 8them during emergencies understand them, that the2: 11others who they may be directing or acquiring2: 14resources from understand those powers as well, and that2: 18the media and communities can understand what2: 19those powers mean.2: 20It should, where possible, include at least a transition2: 24from response to recovery, and ideally include development of2: 29recovery capabilities, knowledge, practise, and2: 31appointments.2: 33At the very least, it should provide for transition from2: 36response to recovery.2: 41Events over the last few decades, though, have caused2: 44us to think about the role of legislation in emergency2: 47management.2: 49And the foundations of emergency management,2: 52previously suggested to be civil2: 54defence, have been shaken.2: 57That's brought about legislative changes.2: 59So we're moving from generic, natural, all-hazards approach,3: 4to a hazards and risk-based approach.3: 6So from a generic approach, that means we're prepared for3: 9anything, whatever comes along, to actually3: 12understanding the risks that we are really preparing for,3: 14looking to reduce, respond to, and recover from.3: 20It's from a response focus to a more comprehensive risk3: 23management model, about continuity of operations, and3: 26about building resilience, so moving from response to a3: 30comprehensive model.3: 32It's about moving from a top-down command and control3: 35focused model to more community empowerment and3: 38coordination across the agencies that are involved in3: 40emergency management.3: 42So we're seeing significant changes occurring within3: 45emergency management.3: 46Although, the legislative structure will stay the same.3: 50The content is changing markedly, as we learn lessons3: 53from emergencies that we have to deal with,3: 56either at home or abroad.4: 00 pmSo in this topic, we've looked very briefly at a standard4: 3model for emergency management legislation and some of the4: 6challenges that are occurring within that legislation as we4: 9become more aware of what we need to do to be able to meet4: 12the needs of our communities in a more comprehensive and4: 15collaborative way into the future.4: 18In the next topic, we're going to look at the application of4: 21some of those best practise measures that we talked about4: 24in an earlier topic, within the context of the Canterbury4: 28quakes in New Zealand.4: 29Some very challenging situations were faced by4: 32organisations and communities in that context that4: 35reinforced some of the lessons we should have learned in the4: 37past and have given us an opportunity to be flexible and4: 41adaptive in our application of legislation to make sure we4: 44get the best of it, now and then potentially learn lessons4: 48from it into the future

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

12:09
In The Previous Topic, we looked at The Application of.
12:11
Emergency Management in a legal context in New Zealand,.
12:14 a.m.
which could be seen to be best practice in Emergency.
12:17 a.m.
Management.
12:18
We ' now re Going to Look at The Application of Emergency.
0:21
Management in a legal context more generally and some of The.
twelve twenty-four
Changes that are occurring Within legal approaches to.
twelve twenty-six
Emergency Management.
00:28
A standard format for Emergency Legislative Management
twelve thirty-two
outlines and Scope The purpose of The legislation.
12:35 a.m.
This is standard practice Legislative.
twelve thirty-eight a.m.
But for Emergency Management, we Need to Make sure that.
12:40
Within that context, it is Well Articulated What we mean.
00:43
by Emergency Management, Who it Applies to, and What The.
0:46
context is for, in this Case, The Nation, or Perhaps State.
twelve fifty-one a.m.
Within which The legislation's been developed.
00:54
One Need to Make sure The Terminology that is clear and
0:57
consistent for Use Within that context.
01:03
It should outline which hazards The Emergency.
1:05
legislation intends to Deal with Management.
1:09
What are The hazards that are Going to be Managed by. that
1:11 a.m.
legislation?
one thirteen
It should then Identify roles and responsibilities at.
one seventeen
National, State, Local, and organizational Level in.
one twenty
sufficient detail to Enable planning to occur.
01:24
It should include a requirement to So that Plan
01:27
then those Who Have responsibility Document that Will Work.
1:30
to Give it in a collaborative Way to Ensure that The Needs.
1:33 a.m.
of their Communities are best met.
1:36
It Will usually include a Process for.
1:38 a.m.
declaring an Emergency.
1:40 a.m.
Often that means more a declaration of Emergency.
1:42
Resources are Made Available to those responding.
one forty-four a.m.
But at least we Need to Make sure The Process of So doing.
one forty-six
is clear So that it Can Happen Quickly and unambiguous.
01:50
When it Needs to.
one fifty-three
Have It should Provision for Emergency powers, So that.
one fifty-six a.m.
When either a declaration of an Emergency is Made, or.
1:59
When sometimes more generally Where a situation has arisen
two three
clearly those powers are necessary, that those powers.
2:05 a.m.
are then outlined and that those Who are Going to Have.
2:08
them during Emergencies Understand them, that The.
two eleven
others Who May be they directing or acquiring
2:14
Resources from those powers Understand As Well, and that.
two eighteen
Can Understand What The Media and Communities.
02:19
mean those powers.
2:20 a.m.
It should, Where possible, include at least a transition.
two twenty-four
from Response to Recovery, and Development of ideally include.
2:29 a.m.
Recovery Capabilities, Knowledge, practice, and.
2:31
Appointments.
two thirty-three
The At very least, it should Provide for transition from.
2:36
Response to Recovery.
2:41 a.m.
events over The Last few decades, though, Have caused.
2:44
to Think About Us The role of legislation in Emergency.
two forty-seven
Management.
2:49
And The Foundations of Emergency Management,.
2:52
SUGGESTED previously to be Civil
2:54
Defence, Have been Shaken.
02:57
That's brought About Legislative Changes.
two fifty-nine a.m.
So we're Moving from Generic, natural, all-hazards Approach,.
three four
to a hazards and risk-based Approach.
three six
So from a Generic Approach, that means we're Prepared for.
three nine
anything, Whatever Comes Along, to actually.
three twelve
understanding The risks that we are Really Preparing for,.
3:14
Looking to Reduce, Respond to, and Recover from.
03 : 20
​​It's from a Comprehensive Response Focus to a more risk.
three twenty-three a.m.
Model Management, Continuity of Operations About, and.
3:26
About Building resilience, So Moving from Response to a.
3:30 a.m.
Comprehensive Model.
03:32
It's About Moving from a Top-down Command and Control.
3:35
Focused Model to more and Community Empowerment.
3:38
coordination Across The Agencies that are Involved in.
3:40 a.m.
Emergency Management.
three forty-two
So we're Seeing significant occurring Changes Within.
three forty-five
Emergency Management.
3:46
Although, The Legislative Will Stay The Same structure.
three fifty
The content is Changing markedly, As we Learn Lessons.
03:53
that we Have to Deal with Emergencies from,.
three fifty-six
either at Home or abroad.
04 : 00
So in this Topic, we've looked very briefly at a standard.
four three a.m.
Model for Emergency Management legislation and some of The.
4:06
challenges that are occurring Within that legislation As we.
4:09
Become more Aware of What we Need. to do to be Able to Meet.
4:12
The Needs of our Communities in a more Comprehensive and.
four fifteen a.m.
collaborative Way Into The Future.
4:18
In The next Topic, we're Going to Look at The Application of.
4:21
some of those best practice that we talked About Measures.
four twenty-four
in an Earlier Topic, Within The context of The Canterbury.
four twenty-eight a.m.
Quakes in New Zealand.
four twenty-nine a.m.
Mostly were very challenging situations faced by.
four thirty-two
organizations and Communities in that context that
04:35
reinforced some of The Lessons should Have we learned in The.
four thirty-seven
past and Have Given Us an Opportunity to be Flexible and.
4:41
in our Adaptive Application of legislation to Make sure we.
04:44
Get The best of it, now and then potentially Learn Lessons.
4:48 a.m.
from it Into The Future

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

00: 09
In the, previous topic we looked at the application of
00: 11
emergency management in a legal context in Zealand New, 00: 14 which

! Could be seen to be best practise in emergency
00: 17
.

management 00: 18 We 're now going to look at the application of emergency
00: 21
management. In a legal context more generally and some of the
00: 24
changes that are occurring within legal approaches 00: 26 to

.Emergency management.

00: 28 A standard legislative format for emergency management
00: 32
outlines the purpose and scope. Of the legislation.

00: 35 This is standard legislative practise.

00: 38 But for emergency management we need, to make sure. That
00: 40
within that context it is, well articulated what we mean
00: 43
by emergency management who it applies to and,,, What the
00: 46
context, is forIn case this, nation the, perhaps or state
00: 51
within which the legislation 's been developed.

00: 54 One need to make. Sure that the terminology is clear and
00: 57
consistent for use within that context.

01: 03 It should outline which hazards. The emergency
01: 05
management legislation intends to deal with.

01: 09 What are the hazards that are going to be managed. By that
01: 11
legislation?
01: 13
.It should then identify roles and responsibilities at

national 01: 17,,, state local and organisational level in
01: 20
sufficient. Detail to enable planning to occur.

01: 24 It should include a requirement to plan so that
01: 27
those who have responsibility. Will then document that work
01: 30
to give it in a collaborative way to ensure that the needs
01: 33
of their communities. Are best met.
01: 36
.It will usually include a process for
01: 38
declaring an emergency.

01: 40 Often a declaration of emergency means that more
01: 42
resources. Are made available to those responding.

01: 44 But at least we need to make sure the process of doing so
01: 46
is clear and. Unambiguous so that it can happen quickly
01: 50
when it needs to.

01: 53 It should have provision for, emergency powers so. 01: 56 that

.Either when a declaration of an emergency, is made or
01: 59
sometimes more generally when a situation has arisen where
02: 03
clearly. Those powers, are necessary that those powers
02: 05
are outlined and that those who are then going to have
02: 08
them during. Emergencies, understand them that the
02: 11
others who they may be directing or 02: 14 acquiring

.Resources from understand those powers, as well and that
02: 18
the media and communities can understand what
02: 19
those. Powers mean.

It, 02: 20 should where possible include at, least a transition
02: 24
from response to recovery and ideally,, Include development of
02: 29
recovery,,, capabilities knowledge practise and
02: 31
.

appointments 02: 33 At the, very leastIt should provide for transition from
02: 36
response to recovery.

02: 41 Events over the last few decades though have,,, Caused
02: 44
us to think about the role of legislation in emergency
02: 47
.

management 02: 49 And the foundations of emergency. Management

, 02: 52 previously suggested to be civil

, 02: 54 defence have been shaken.

02: 57 That 's brought about legislative. Changes.
02: 59
.So we 're moving from generic natural all-hazards approach,,, 03: 04

to a hazards and risk-based approach.

03: 06 So from. A generic approach that means, we 're prepared for

anything 03: 09, comes, whatever along to actually
03: 12
understanding. The risks that we are really for preparing, 03: 14

looking to reduce respond to, and recover, from.
03: 20
.It 's from a response focus to a more comprehensive risk
03: 23
management model about continuity operations, of, 03: 26 about and

! Building resilience so moving, from response to a
03: 30
comprehensive model.

03: 32 It 's about moving from a top-down command. And control
03: 35
focused model to more community empowerment and
03: 38
coordination across the agencies that are involved. 03: 40 in

.Emergency management.

03: 42 So we 're seeing significant changes occurring within
03: 45
emergency management.

, 03: 46 Although. The legislative structure will stay the same.

03: 50 The content is changing markedly as we, learn lessons
03: 53
from emergencies. That we have to with deal, 03: 56

either at home or abroad.

04: 00 So in, this topic we 've looked very briefly at a 04: 03 Standard

.Model for emergency management legislation and some of the
04: 06
challenges that are occurring within that legislation. As we
04: 09
become more aware of what we need to do to be able to meet
04: 12
the needs of our communities in a more comprehensive. And
04: 15
collaborative way into the future.

04: 18 In the, next topic we 're going to look at the application 04: 21 of

.Some of those best practise measures that we talked about
04: 24
in an, earlier topic within the context of the Canterbury
04: 28
quakes. In New Zealand.

04: 29 Some very challenging situations were faced by
04: 32
organisations and communities in that context. That
04: 35
reinforced some of the lessons we should have learned in the
04: 37
past and have given us an opportunity to be. Flexible 04: 41 and

.Adaptive in our application of legislation to make sure we
04: 44
get the best, of it now and then potentially learn lessons
04: 48
from. It into the future.