An important point to understand is that a measure can be perfectly re การแปล - An important point to understand is that a measure can be perfectly re อังกฤษ วิธีการพูด

An important point to understand is

An important point to understand is that a measure can be perfectly reliable and yet not be valid. Consider a bathroom scale that always weighs you as being 5 lbs. heavier than your true weight. This scale (though invalid as it incorrectly assesses weight) is perfectly reliable as it consistently weighs you as being 5 lbs. heavier than you truly are. A research example of this phenomenon would be a questionnaire designed to assess job satisfaction that asked questions such as, “Do you like to watch ice hockey games?”, “what do you like to eat more, pizza or hamburgers?” and “what is your favorite movie?”. As you can readily imagine, the responses to these questions would probably remain stable over time, thus, demonstrating highly reliable scores. However, are the questions valid when one is attempting to measure job satisfaction? Of course not, as they have nothing to do with an individual s level of job satisfaction. While this example may seem just a tad far-fetched l hope that you grasp the underlying difference between reliability and validity
0/5000
จาก: -
เป็น: -
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1: [สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
An important point to understand is that a measure can be perfectly reliable and yet not be valid. Consider a bathroom scale that always weighs you as being 5 lbs. heavier than your true weight. This scale (though invalid as it incorrectly assesses weight) is perfectly reliable as it consistently weighs you as being 5 lbs. heavier than you truly are. A research example of this phenomenon would be a questionnaire designed to assess job satisfaction that asked questions such as, "Do you like to watch ice hockey games?", "what do you like to eat more, pizza or hamburgers?" and "what is your favorite movie?". As you can readily imagine, the responses to these questions would probably remain stable over time, thus, demonstrating highly reliable scores. However, are the questions valid when one is attempting to measure job satisfaction? Of course not, as they have nothing to do with an individual s level of job satisfaction. While this example may seem just a tad far-fetched l hope that you grasp the underlying difference between reliability and validity
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:[สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
An important point to understand is that a measure can be perfectly reliable and yet not be valid. Consider a bathroom scale that always weighs you as being 5 lbs. heavier than your true weight. This scale (though invalid as it incorrectly assesses weight) is perfectly reliable as it consistently weighs you as being 5 lbs. heavier than you truly are. A research example of this phenomenon would be a questionnaire designed to assess job satisfaction that asked questions such as, "Do you like to watch ice hockey games?", "What do you like to eat more, pizza or hamburgers?" And "what. is your favorite movie? ". As you can readily imagine, the responses to these questions would probably remain stable over time, thus, demonstrating highly reliable scores. However, are the questions valid when one is attempting to measure job satisfaction? Of course not, as they have nothing to do with an individual s level of job satisfaction. While this example may seem just a tad far-fetched l hope that you grasp the underlying difference between reliability and validity.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:[สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
An important point to understand is that a measure can be perfectly reliable and yet not be valid. Consider a bathroom. Scale that always weighs you as being 5 lbs. Heavier than your true weight. This scale (though invalid as it incorrectly. Assesses weight) is perfectly reliable as it consistently weighs you as being 5 lbs. Heavier than you truly are.A research example of this phenomenon would be a questionnaire designed to assess job satisfaction that asked questions. Such as, "Do you like to watch ice hockey games?", "what do you like to eat more pizza or, hamburgers?" and what is your. " Favorite movie? ". As you can, readily imagine the responses to these questions would probably remain stable over time thus,,Demonstrating highly reliable scores. However are the, questions valid when one is attempting to measure job satisfaction?? Of course not as they, have nothing to do with an individual s level of job satisfaction. While this example may seem just. A tad far-fetched l hope that you grasp the underlying difference between reliability and validity
.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
 
ภาษาอื่น ๆ
การสนับสนุนเครื่องมือแปลภาษา: กรีก, กันนาดา, กาลิเชียน, คลิงออน, คอร์สิกา, คาซัค, คาตาลัน, คินยารวันดา, คีร์กิซ, คุชราต, จอร์เจีย, จีน, จีนดั้งเดิม, ชวา, ชิเชวา, ซามัว, ซีบัวโน, ซุนดา, ซูลู, ญี่ปุ่น, ดัตช์, ตรวจหาภาษา, ตุรกี, ทมิฬ, ทาจิก, ทาทาร์, นอร์เวย์, บอสเนีย, บัลแกเรีย, บาสก์, ปัญจาป, ฝรั่งเศส, พาชตู, ฟริเชียน, ฟินแลนด์, ฟิลิปปินส์, ภาษาอินโดนีเซี, มองโกเลีย, มัลทีส, มาซีโดเนีย, มาราฐี, มาลากาซี, มาลายาลัม, มาเลย์, ม้ง, ยิดดิช, ยูเครน, รัสเซีย, ละติน, ลักเซมเบิร์ก, ลัตเวีย, ลาว, ลิทัวเนีย, สวาฮิลี, สวีเดน, สิงหล, สินธี, สเปน, สโลวัก, สโลวีเนีย, อังกฤษ, อัมฮาริก, อาร์เซอร์ไบจัน, อาร์เมเนีย, อาหรับ, อิกโบ, อิตาลี, อุยกูร์, อุสเบกิสถาน, อูรดู, ฮังการี, ฮัวซา, ฮาวาย, ฮินดี, ฮีบรู, เกลิกสกอต, เกาหลี, เขมร, เคิร์ด, เช็ก, เซอร์เบียน, เซโซโท, เดนมาร์ก, เตลูกู, เติร์กเมน, เนปาล, เบงกอล, เบลารุส, เปอร์เซีย, เมารี, เมียนมา (พม่า), เยอรมัน, เวลส์, เวียดนาม, เอสเปอแรนโต, เอสโทเนีย, เฮติครีโอล, แอฟริกา, แอลเบเนีย, โคซา, โครเอเชีย, โชนา, โซมาลี, โปรตุเกส, โปแลนด์, โยรูบา, โรมาเนีย, โอเดีย (โอริยา), ไทย, ไอซ์แลนด์, ไอร์แลนด์, การแปลภาษา.

Copyright ©2026 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: