AbstractsThis thesis aims to study the problem to define indemnification in case the parcel in the event of any dispute before making a contract. By a comparative study of the theory of evolution and the concept involved in matters of liability before a contract. Principles of aesthetics and yiao corrupted the concept of assigning the claim of the Republic of France and the Federal Republic of Germany.The study found that the case of parcels in the procedure before a contract has not yet been defined criteria is of course that if private bid has been damaged by the actions of the administrative agency or officer of the State unlawful, then. To make a claim for damage from the administrative agency or officer of the State? If called upon.To claim by virtue of any legal principles and characteristics should be remedies for damages from such action? In order to become a corrupt medications yiao occurs because in the process of purchasing the parcel in accordance with the Prime Minister's Office Act b.e. 2535 parcels which are performed for selected partners who will contract with State agencies. If the Government action, one of theUnlawful That is why private bid is corrupted. Private sector will be able to claim by virtue of the nature of any law. When the relationship between the layers in the Government with the private sector.Offer price is just to prepare the negotiations undertaken. By law, Thailand still has no system provisions of prior contracts, such as the Republic of France and the Federal Republic of Germany.The principle of liability before a contract. in both cases the parents lawsuits about the parcel. That is neither about the action or responsibility of the administrative agency or officer of the State. In the process, to make the administrative contract, in accordance with article 9, paragraph 1 (3) of the Act establishing administrative courts and procedures, b.e. 2542 has not yet defined the criteria in determining the. The claim was only, and there is a problem in determining the indemnity in the case that there is a request to prosecute Government liability to pay damages in compensation for the lack of income from contracts with non-government units. Which the Court deems a second approach in such cases, it should be how to make the case to justice. This thesis, therefore, to offer guidance on how to fix the problem in order to determine the nature of the.Liability that occur at various steps in the procurement process, in accordance with the Prime Minister's Office Act b.e. 2535 parcel that is supposed to be a liability in a manner violating liability or liability.The contractual liability in specific contracts, bringing to the event that is the problem with both the present criteria that seems to be used as a criterion in determining the indemnity in case of parcels and determining the compensation should be given for damages? If one needs to use discretion in determining what criteria should be implemented to allow the case to be fair and just in case the legal gap. The Court will take the main Forensic Economics to this case?
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..