etal,1992).Burnsgenerallyproducesignificantamountsof
exudate,whichcanbecomedriedandadheretothedressing
causing pain on removal. The Safetac-technology-based
wound-contactlayerofMepitelOnepreventsthisoccurring.
Themajorityofpatientsfoundthedressingcomfortable
whileinsitu,enablingthemtocarryoutnecessaryexercises
that enabledthemtomaintainfunction.The dressingwas
removedeasilyandinthemajority,didnotrequiresoaking.
Onremoval,thedressingdidnotcauseanytraumatothe
woundbeneath.
Somenursingstafffelttherewerenoadditionalbenefits
ofusingMepitelOneoverMepitel,however,MepitelOne
isthinnerthanMepitelandstaffcommentedthatthismade
iteasiertoremovefromthewoundbedandithadimproved
conformability,which couldpotentiallyresultinimproved
function.The product overall was easier to handle and
visibilityofthewoundbedwasincreased
et al, 1992). Burns generally produce significant amounts of
exudate, which can become dried and adhere to the dressing
causing pain on removal. The Safetac-technology-based
wound-contact layer of Mepitel One prevents this occurring.
The majority of patients found the dressing comfortable
while in situ, enabling them to carry out necessary exercises
that enabled them to maintain function. The dressing was
removed easily and in the majority, did not require soaking.
On removal, the dressing did not cause any trauma to the
wound beneath.
Some nursing staff felt there were no additional benefits
of using Mepitel One over Mepitel, however, Mepitel One
is thinner than Mepitel and staff commented that this made
it easier to remove from the wound bed and it had improved
conformability, which could potentially result in improved
function. The product overall was easier to handle and
visibility of the wound bed was increased
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
Et, al 1992). Burns generally produce significant amounts of
exudate which, can become dried and adhere to the dressing
causing Pain on removal. The Safetac-technology-based
wound-contact layer of Mepitel One prevents this occurring.
The majority of patients found the dressing comfortable
while in situ enabling, them to carry out necessary exercises
That enabled them to maintain function. The Dressing was
removed easily and in the majority did, not require soaking.
On removal the, dressing did not cause any trauma to the
wound beneath.
Some nursing staff felt there were no additional benefits
of using Mepitel One over , however Mepitel , Mepitel One
is thinner than Mepitel and staff commented that this made
It easier to remove from the wound bed and it had improved
conformability which, Could potentially result in improved
function. The product overall was easier to handle and
visibility of the wound bed was increased
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..