Conceptually, the model we propose is based on previous interdisciplinary experiences. It also draws on applications with different foci, for instance, models addressing remediation/ removal of adverse effects (as in the case of classical pollution-damage-to-health relationships) and those taking a more proactive approach (such as those relating to the provisioning of beneficial effects on human health and wellbeing).
Another aspect is that in the same way as human influence can adversely affect ecosystems, negative effects or ‘dis-services’ of ecosystems (such as transmitting vectorborne diseases or flooding) should be accounted for in a comprehensive impact assessment framework.
The frameworks which would emerge from embracing these wider considerations would include dynamic feedbacks (both positive and negative), and may be considered ‘a bridge too far,until a consolidated view has been established in both the research and policy communities.
Conceptually, the model we propose is based on previous interdisciplinary experiences. It also draws on applications with different foci, for instance, models addressing remediation/ removal of adverse effects (as in the case of classical pollution-damage-to-health relationships) and those taking a more proactive approach (such as those relating to the provisioning of beneficial effects on human health and wellbeing).Another aspect is that in the same way as human influence can adversely affect ecosystems, negative effects or 'dis-services' of ecosystems (such as transmitting vectorborne diseases or flooding) should be accounted for in a comprehensive impact assessment framework. The frameworks which would emerge from embracing these wider considerations would include dynamic feedbacks (both positive and negative), and may be considered 'a bridge too far,until a consolidated view has been established in both the research and policy communities.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
Conceptually, the model we propose is based on previous interdisciplinary experiences. It also draws on applications with different foci, for instance, models addressing remediation / removal of adverse effects (as in the case of classical pollution-damage-to-health relationships) and those taking a more proactive approach (such as those relating to the. provisioning of beneficial effects on Human Health and Wellbeing).
Another Aspect is that in The Same Way As Human influence Can adversely affect Ecosystems, Negative effects or 'Dis-Services' of Ecosystems (Such As Transmitting vectorborne Diseases or flooding) should be accounted for. in a Comprehensive Impact Assessment Framework.
The Frameworks which would emerge from Embracing these wider Considerations would include Dynamic feedbacks (Both positive and Negative), and May be considered 'a Bridge Too Far, until a Consolidated View has been Established in Both The Research and. policy communities.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
Conceptually the model, we propose is based on previous interdisciplinary experiences. It also draws on applications with. Different foci for instance,,Models addressing remediation / removal of adverse effects (as in the case of classical pollution-damage-to-health relationships). And those taking a more proactive approach (such as those relating to the provisioning of beneficial effects on human health. And wellbeing).
Another aspect is that in the same way as human influence can adversely, affect ecosystemsNegative effects or 'dis-services' of ecosystems (such as transmitting vectorborne diseases or flooding) should be accounted. For in a comprehensive impact assessment framework.
The frameworks which would emerge from embracing these wider considerations. Would include dynamic feedbacks (both positive and negative), and may be considered 'a bridge, too farUntil a consolidated view has been established in both the research and policy communities.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..