ฉันรักThis studywas conducted to de

ฉันรักThis studywas conducted to develop a selective mediumfor the detection of Campylobacter spp. in fresh produce.
Campylobacter spp. (n=4), non-Campylobacter (showing positive results on Campylobacter selective agar) strains
(n = 49) isolated from fresh produce, indicator bacteria (n =13), and spoilage bacteria isolated from fresh produce
(n = 15) were plated on four Campylobacter selective media. Bolton agar and modified charcoal
cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) exhibited higher sensitivity for Campylobacter spp. than did Preston
agar and Hunt agar, although certain non-Campylobacter strains isolated from fresh produce by using a selective
agar isolation method, were still able to grow on Bolton agar and mCCDA. To inhibit the growth of non-Campylobacter
strains, Bolton agar and mCCDA were supplemented with 5 antibiotics (rifampicin, polymyxin B, sodium
metabisulfite, sodiumpyruvate, ferrous sulfate) and the growth of Campylobacter spp. (n=7) and non-Campylobacter
strains (n=44) was evaluated. Although Bolton agar supplemented with rifampicin (BR agar) exhibited a
higher selectivity for Campylobacter spp. than did mCCDA supplemented with antibiotics, certain non-Campylobacter
strains were still able to grow on BR agar (18.8%).When BR agar with various concentrations of sulfamethoxazole–
trimethoprim were tested with Campylobacter spp. (n = 8) and non-Campylobacter (n = 7),
sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim was inhibitory against 3 of 7 non-Campylobacter strains. Finally, we validated
the use of BR agar containing 50 mg/L sulfamethoxazole (BRS agar) or 0.5 mg/L ciprofloxacin (BRCS agar) and
other selective agars for the detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken and fresh produce. All chicken samples
were positive for Campylobacter spp. when tested on mCCDA, BR agar, and BRS agar. In fresh produce samples,
BRS agar exhibited the highest selectivity for Campylobacter spp., demonstrating its suitability for the detection
of Campylobacter spp. in fresh produce.เด็ก

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

I love This studywas conducted to develop a selective mediumfor in the detection of Campylobacter spp. fresh produce.Campylobacter spp. (n=4), non-Campylobacter (showing positive results on Campylobacter selective agar) strains(n = 49) isolated from fresh produce, indicator bacteria (n =13), and spoilage bacteria isolated from fresh produce(n = 15) were plated on four Campylobacter selective media. Bolton agar and modified charcoalcefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) exhibited higher sensitivity for Campylobacter spp. than did Prestonagar and Hunt agar, although certain non-Campylobacter strains isolated from fresh produce by using a selectiveagar isolation method, were still able to grow on Bolton agar and mCCDA. To inhibit the growth of non-Campylobacterstrains, Bolton agar and mCCDA were supplemented with 5 antibiotics (rifampicin, polymyxin B, sodiummetabisulfite, sodiumpyruvate, ferrous sulfate) and the growth of Campylobacter spp. (n=7) and non-Campylobacterstrains (n=44) was evaluated. Although Bolton agar supplemented with rifampicin (BR agar) exhibited ahigher selectivity for Campylobacter spp. than did mCCDA supplemented with antibiotics, certain non-Campylobacterstrains were still able to grow on BR agar (18.8%).When BR agar with various concentrations of sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim were tested with Campylobacter spp. (n = 8) and non-Campylobacter (n = 7),sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim was inhibitory against 3 of 7 non-Campylobacter strains. Finally, we validatedthe use of BR agar containing 50 mg/L sulfamethoxazole (BRS agar) or 0.5 mg/L ciprofloxacin (BRCS agar) andother selective agars for the detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken and fresh produce. All chicken sampleswere positive for Campylobacter spp. when tested on mCCDA, BR agar, and BRS agar. In fresh produce samples,BRS agar exhibited the highest selectivity for Campylobacter spp., demonstrating its suitability for the detectionOf Campylobacter spp in fresh produce children..

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

I Love This Studywas Conducted to Develop a Selective Mediumfor The Detection of Campylobacter spp. In Fresh Produce.
Campylobacter spp. (n = 4), non-Campylobacter (showing positive results on Campylobacter Selective agar) strains
(n = 49) isolated from Fresh. Produce, Indicator bacteria (n = 13), and spoilage bacteria isolated from Fresh Produce
(n = 15) were Plated on Four Campylobacter Selective Media. Bolton agar and modified Charcoal
cefoperazone Deoxycholate agar (MCCDA) exhibited Higher sensitivity for Campylobacter spp. than did. Preston
agar and Hunt agar, although Certain non-Campylobacter strains isolated from Fresh Produce by using a Selective
agar Isolation Method, were Still Able to Grow on Bolton agar and MCCDA. To inhibit The growth of non-Campylobacter
strains, Bolton agar and MCCDA were. supplemented with 5 Antibiotics (rifampicin, Polymyxin B, Sodium
metabisulfite, Sodiumpyruvate, Ferrous sulfate) and The growth of Campylobacter spp. (n = 7) and non-Campylobacter
strains (n = 44) was evaluated. Although Bolton agar supplemented with rifampicin (. BR agar) exhibited a
Higher selectivity for Campylobacter spp. than did MCCDA supplemented with Antibiotics, Certain non-Campylobacter
strains were Still Able to Grow on BR agar (18.8%). When BR agar with Various concentrations of Sulfamethoxazole-
TRIMETHOPRIM were tested with Campylobacter. spp. (n = 8) and non-Campylobacter (n = 7),
SULFAMETHOXAZOLE-TRIMETHOPRIM was inhibitory Against 3 of 7 non-Campylobacter strains. Finally, we Validated
The Use of BR agar containing 50 mg / L SULFAMETHOXAZOLE (BRS agar). or 0.5 mg / L ciprofloxacin (BRC's agar) and
Other Selective Agars for The Detection of Campylobacter spp. in Chicken and Fresh Produce. All Chicken samples
were positive for Campylobacter spp. When tested on MCCDA, BR agar, and BRS agar. In Fresh. Produce samples,
BRS agar exhibited selectivity for The Highest Campylobacter spp., demonstrating ITS SUITABILITY for The Detection
of Campylobacter spp. in Fresh Produce. children.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

I love This studywas conducted to develop a selective mediumfor the detection of Campylobacter spp. In fresh produce.
Campylobacter. Spp. (n = 4), non-Campylobacter (showing positive results on Campylobacter selective agar) strains
(n = 49) isolated from. Fresh, produce indicator bacteria (n = 13), and spoilage bacteria isolated from fresh produce
.(n = 15) were plated on four Campylobacter selective media. Bolton agar and modified charcoal
cefoperazone deoxycholate. Agar (mCCDA) exhibited higher sensitivity for Campylobacter spp. Than did Preston
agar and, Hunt agar although certain non-Campylobacter. Strains isolated from fresh produce by using a selective
agar, isolation method were still able to grow on Bolton agar and. MCCDA.To inhibit the growth of non-Campylobacter
strains Bolton agar, and mCCDA were supplemented with 5 antibiotics (rifampicin,, Polymyxin B sodium
metabisulfite,,, sodiumpyruvate ferrous sulfate) and the growth of Campylobacter spp. (n = 7) and non-Campylobacter
strains. (n = 44) was evaluated. Although Bolton agar supplemented with rifampicin (BR agar) exhibited a
.Higher selectivity for Campylobacter spp. Than did mCCDA supplemented, with antibiotics certain non-Campylobacter
strains. Were still able to grow on BR agar (18.8%). When BR agar with various concentrations of sulfamethoxazole -
trimethoprim were. Tested with Campylobacter spp. (n = 8) and non-Campylobacter (n = 7),
.Sulfamethoxazole - trimethoprim was inhibitory against 3 of 7 non-Campylobacter strains. Finally we, validated
the use of. BR agar containing 50 mg / L sulfamethoxazole (BRS agar) or 0.5 mg / L ciprofloxacin (BRCS agar) and
other selective agars for. The detection of Campylobacter spp. In chicken and fresh produce. All chicken samples
were positive for Campylobacter, spp. When tested on mCCDA BR agar,,And BRS agar. In fresh, produce samples
BRS agar exhibited the highest selectivity for Campylobacter spp, demonstrating. Its suitability for the detection
of Campylobacter spp. In fresh produce. Children.