Common system's legal system was developed in England since ancient times. In those days, the law in England was influenced by Roman law a little. The applicable law is. Customary laws of various local ethnic groups, many of which are autoimmune conditions residence areas scattered around England and tradition. Regulations define the lives of members of their group. It's customary to look at the variety and lack of unity. Until the absolutist regime ultimate reign under the rule of the "king" who has absolute supremacy. The new regime is broken. In the land As a supplement to the Crown prerogative over other landholders. Were not representative of the king in the court to decide a case in a local variety called "Salhlwg" (Royal Corut) to consider the diagnosis of Salhlwg are two ways:
1) is bringing the tradition of local adaptation. Use the facts that occurred following the decision of the local Salhlwg it must accept and follow. For disputes that arise between a local and a decision whether to use any of the local tradition. Has been solved by Salhlwg a judge disputes such as
two) in the absence of a tradition of local Salhlwg must establish the rule of law was renewed by the use of reason to consider the fact that a dispute already Salhlwg place. Criteria for the award of the reason lies in the fact that the relationship of the rules, such as rules that differ from the original local law is not a law but a judge ruling in accordance with the law. Generally it
later when longer periods of time, we have developed a system under the same rules as those set Salhlwg without discrimination as before anymore. The system was developed under the same rules as those set Salhlwg without discrimination as before anymore. The organization of this tradition is the only one making it a centralized system. Or common law (Common Law) by which the common law that is essentially made up of a customary law court or the main reason of the facts in dispute. Not an arbitrary decision made following the principle of judgment that have come before the judge with the same facts occur in accordance with the principle that the facts must be treated alike. And later developed a theory until a judgment based on law, the Judgment (The doctrine of precedent) at the end of the century. 18
and later, when the common law had developed to the maximum in the 15th century can not be developed further. Whether the proceedings are strictly limited and must be binding on the Supreme Court, the norms of common law. Law common law of Salhlwg start inconsistent with the needs of society. I can not respond to issues that arise from the transformation of society. Or the concept of judges who are conservative and too many people do not get justice from the court common law. To turn to and rely upon the fairness of liaising Load Chancellor of the Crown to ameliorate the suffering of the Load Chancellor has offices in the Court of Chancery has healed hardship to the complainant. The principle of fairness in each case (The Equity of the case), that is discrimination cases based on social justice and the benefits are huge. Nor abided by the law along. A common law court judgment. The main development was beaten up in the queue. The main accumulators This utility is the law of England as the one that occurred to deliver justice to the people. Coupled with common law. In the common law system is to be fair to have a more complete
pass to the 18th century when the British upper classes grow up and took hold of Parliament. And with more and more power. There has been legislation to amend the law, the common law is inconsistent with the expansion of capitalism in those days. In the early common law court refused to apply the law written on the practice commandments up. The judge believes. Common law system is the reason that has been prepared by scholars, so long as the system is complete. But the longer he needs the public has forced the court to accept written law. Nonetheless, the court was still reluctant to say or do anything, and try to reserve the right not to apply the law of Parliament. When the law is contrary to reason or sense of the public. The court cited the freedom not to use the law to force. The British parliament has adopted a law that forced the Congress to use force. The court has no discretion to suspend the law. The result of this law, the court avoided to create a common law principle of statutory interpretation. The statute has a minimal effect. The law is written exceptions to the common law. So try to hit a narrow and strict laws to seize the main character, regardless of the intent of the law. Main is interpreted literally (Literal Rule) makes the law written not eat a wide. The law implies a narrow court, it is likely to bring the common law as a general principle applicable to the case that
the evolution of legislative action, coupled with the growing influence of the liberal democratic state. And the concept of Jeremy Bentham cause procedure law reform in the mid-19th century to destroy the law, Brace development of English major. Then comes the law and the English courts gradually. Turn to accept a more substantive law. As a result, common law legal system has been improved to better organize the judiciary by the English Court of Judicature Acts 1873-1875 Total Equity legislation can be used in conjunction with a major common law. But the law also retains the original style. The Court considered a source of legislation, which differ from species Willis establishments in the country in this continent. Just as the British Parliament
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..