Additional arguments for the defendant's idea about the company's damage to the defendant's claims that it can fight the battle and what can I do with more of the company. What are the different?
The idea of the defendant for damages against the company's claim that the defendant is able to fight what it does, and the company has some more fights.
Thinking of the joint fight more about compensation of company to claim for the accused to be able to fight any joints and fight more of the company. What.