We found that both gram-positive (S

We found that both gram-positive (S.
aureus) and gram-negative (E. coli) bacteria that
were fixed to slides using methanol as the fixative
agent adhered more effectively than did cells that
were heat-fixed to slides. Slides of S. aureus fixed
with methanol had two to four times as many cells
present than did slides fixed with heat. In the case of
E. coli, the difference was even more dramatic with
five to ten times as many cells present on methanol-fixed slides compared to slides that were heat-fixed.
Methanol fixation prior to Gram staining would
clearly allow students to locate and view bacterial
cells more easily than heat fixation

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

Both Gram-positive that we Found (S.
aureus) and Gram-negative (E. coli) bacteria that
were fixed using methanol as the fixative to Slides
Agent adhered more effectively than did cells that
were heat-fixed to Slides. Slides of S. aureus fixed
with methanol Two to Four times as many cells had
present than did Slides fixed with heat. In the Case of
E. coli, the difference was even more dramatic with
Five to Ten times as many cells present on methanol-fixed Slides compared to Slides that were heat-fixed.
Methanol Fixation prior to Gram staining would
Clearly Allow students to Locate and View bacterial
cells more easily than. heat fixation

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

We found that both Gram-positive (S.
aureus) and gram-negative (E. Coli) bacteria that
were fixed to slides using methanol. As the fixative
agent adhered more effectively than did cells that
were heat-fixed to slides. Slides of S. Aureus fixed.
with methanol had two to four times as many cells
present than did slides fixed with heat. In the case of
, coli E.The difference was even more dramatic with
five to ten times as many cells present on methanol-fixed slides compared to. Slides that were heat-fixed.
Methanol fixation prior to Gram staining would
clearly allow students to locate and view. Bacterial
cells more easily than heat fixation.