(c) How does history proceed? History proceeds by the interpretation of evidence: where evidence is a collective name for things which singly are called documents, and a document is a thing existing here and now, of such a kind that the historian, by thinking about it, can get answers to the questions he asks about past events. Here again there are plenty of difficult questions to ask as to what the characteristics of evidence are and how it is interpreted. But there is no need for us to raise them at this stage. However they are answered, historians will agree that historical procedure, or method, consists essentially of interpreting evidence.
(c) How does history proceed? History proceeds by the interpretation of evidence: where evidence is a collective name for things which singly are called documents, and a document is a thing existing here and now, of such a kind that the historian, by thinking about it, can get answers to the questions he asks about past events. Here again there are plenty of difficult questions to ask as to what the characteristics of evidence are and how it is interpreted. But there is no need for us to raise them at this stage. However they are answered, historians will agree that historical procedure, or method, consists essentially of interpreting evidence.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
(C) How does history proceed? History proceeds by the interpretation of evidence: where evidence is a collective name for things which singly are called documents, and a document is a thing existing here and now, of such a kind that the historian, by thinking about it, can get answers to. the questions he asks about past events. Here again there are plenty of difficult questions to ask as to what the characteristics of evidence are and how it is interpreted. But there is no need for us to raise them at this stage. However they are answered, historians will agree that historical procedure, or method, consists essentially of interpreting evidence.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
(c) How does history proceed? History proceeds by the interpretation of evidence: where evidence is a collective name. For things which singly are called documents and a, document is a thing existing here and now of such, a kind that, the historian. By thinking about it can get, answers to the questions he asks about past events.Here again there are plenty of difficult questions to ask as to what the characteristics of evidence are and how it is. Interpreted. But there is no need for us to raise them at this stage. However they, are answered historians will agree that. Historical procedure or method, consists essentially, of interpreting evidence.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..