School cafeterias that accept only electronic payments may be inadvert การแปล - School cafeterias that accept only electronic payments may be inadvert อังกฤษ วิธีการพูด

School cafeterias that accept only

School cafeterias that accept only electronic payments may be inadvertently promoting junkier food and adding empty calories to student diets, which contribute to obesity, say Cornell behavioral economists in the journal Obesity, Sept. 23.

Increasingly, schools use debit cards or accounts for cafeteria lunch transactions, write David Just and Brian Wansink, professors at the Cornell Center for Behavioral Economics in Child Nutrition Programs. To expedite long lunch lines and enable cleaner accounting, about 80 percent of the nation’s elementary and secondary schools have implemented debit systems that parents can add money to at any time.

“There may be a reason for concern about the popularity of cashless systems,” say the researchers. “Debit cards have been shown to induce more frivolous purchases or greater overall spending by adults and college students.”

Just and Wansink compared purchases at school cafeterias that use debit-only systems with those that accept debit or cash. They found that students at debit/cash cafeterias consumed about 721 calories compared with 752 calories at debit-only schools.

For non-healthy food items alone – such as candy, dessert, cheeseburgers and fries – students at debit-only schools consumed 441 calories during their lunch, compared with 378 calories for students at debit/cash schools.

An ice cream sandwich here and a bag of potato chips there add up: A child can draw down debit accounts quickly, the research points out. Parents pay for several weeks’ worth of lunches in advance, often with little control over individual transactions. Parents often have difficulty gauging how long the money should last, if spent wisely.

“This may lead children to generally greater spending on lunch,” the researchers report.

The results, the researchers add, have important implications for schools and child obesity. A small number of schools have introduced debit systems that allow parents to regulate daily spending, which can help combat the problem. If the use of cash, as opposed to debit cards, can nudge a student into making slightly healthier choices, then perhaps a “cash-for-cookies” policy, for example, would “encourage students to think twice before making their selection,” said Just and Wansink.

The study, “School Lunch Debit Card Payment Systems Are Associated With Lower Nutrition and Higher Calories,” was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
0/5000
จาก: -
เป็น: -
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1: [สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
School cafeterias that accept only electronic payments may be inadvertently promoting junkier food and adding empty calories to student diets, which contribute to obesity, say Cornell behavioral economists in the journal Obesity, Sept. 23.Increasingly, schools use debit cards or accounts for cafeteria lunch transactions, write David Just and Brian Wansink, professors at the Cornell Center for Behavioral Economics in Child Nutrition Programs. To expedite long lunch lines and enable cleaner accounting, about 80 percent of the nation's elementary and secondary schools have implemented debit systems that parents can add money to at any time."There may be a reason for concern about the popularity of cashless systems," say the researchers. "Debit cards have been shown to induce more frivolous purchases or greater overall spending by adults and college students."Just and Wansink compared purchases at school cafeterias that use debit-only systems with those that accept debit or cash. They found that students at debit/cash cafeterias consumed about 721 calories compared with 752 calories at debit-only schools.For non-healthy food items alone – such as candy, dessert, cheeseburgers and fries – students at debit-only schools consumed 441 calories during their lunch, compared with 378 calories for students at debit/cash schools.An ice cream sandwich here and a bag of potato chips there add up: A child can draw down debit accounts quickly, the research points out. Parents pay for several weeks' worth of lunches in advance, often with little control over individual transactions. Parents often have difficulty gauging how long the money should last, if spent wisely."This may lead children to generally greater spending on lunch," the researchers report.The results, the researchers add, have important implications for schools and child obesity. A small number of schools have introduced debit systems that allow parents to regulate daily spending, which can help combat the problem. If the use of cash, as opposed to debit cards, can nudge a student into making slightly healthier choices, then perhaps a "cash-for-cookies" policy, for example, would "encourage students to think twice before making their selection," said Just and Wansink.The study, "School Lunch Debit Card Payment Systems Are Associated With Lower Nutrition and Higher Calories," was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:[สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
School cafeterias that accept only electronic payments may be inadvertently promoting junkier food and adding empty calories to student diets, which contribute to obesity, say Cornell behavioral economists in the journal Obesity, Sept. 23.

Increasingly, schools use debit cards or accounts for cafeteria lunch transactions, write David Just and Brian Wansink, professors at the Cornell Center for Behavioral Economics in Child Nutrition Programs. To expedite long lunch lines and enable cleaner accounting, about 80 percent of the nation’s elementary and secondary schools have implemented debit systems that parents can add money to at any time.

“There may be a reason for concern about the popularity of cashless systems,” say the researchers. “Debit cards have been shown to induce more frivolous purchases or greater overall spending by adults and college students.”

Just and Wansink compared purchases at school cafeterias that use debit-only systems with those that accept debit or cash. They found that students at debit/cash cafeterias consumed about 721 calories compared with 752 calories at debit-only schools.

For non-healthy food items alone – such as candy, dessert, cheeseburgers and fries – students at debit-only schools consumed 441 calories during their lunch, compared with 378 calories for students at debit/cash schools.

An ice cream sandwich here and a bag of potato chips there add up: A child can draw down debit accounts quickly, the research points out. Parents pay for several weeks’ worth of lunches in advance, often with little control over individual transactions. Parents often have difficulty gauging how long the money should last, if spent wisely.

“This may lead children to generally greater spending on lunch,” the researchers report.

The results, the researchers add, have important implications for schools and child obesity. A small number of schools have introduced debit systems that allow parents to regulate daily spending, which can help combat the problem. If the use of cash, as opposed to debit cards, can nudge a student into making slightly healthier choices, then perhaps a “cash-for-cookies” policy, for example, would “encourage students to think twice before making their selection,” said Just and Wansink.

The study, “School Lunch Debit Card Payment Systems Are Associated With Lower Nutrition and Higher Calories,” was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:[สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
School cafeterias that accept only electronic payments may be inadvertently promoting junkier food and adding empty calories. To, student diets which contribute to obesity say Cornell, behavioral economists in the, Journal Obesity Sept. 23.

, Increasingly. Schools use debit cards or accounts for cafeteria, lunch transactions write David Just and, Brian WansinkProfessors at the Cornell Center for Behavioral Economics in Child Nutrition Programs. To expedite long lunch lines and. Enable, cleaner accounting about 80 percent of the nation 's elementary and secondary schools have implemented debit systems. That parents can add money to at any time.

"There may be a reason for concern about the popularity of cashless systems," Say the researchers."Debit cards have been shown to induce more frivolous purchases or greater overall spending by adults and college students."

Just. And Wansink compared purchases at school cafeterias that use debit-only systems with those that accept debit or cash. They. Found that students at debit / cash cafeterias consumed about 721 calories compared with 752 calories at debit-only schools.

.For non-healthy food items alone - such, as candy dessert cheeseburgers and, fries - students at debit-only schools consumed 441 calories. During, their lunch compared with 378 calories for students at debit / cash schools.

An ice cream sandwich here and a bag. Of potato chips there add up: A child can draw down debit, accounts quickly the research points out.Parents pay for several weeks' worth of lunches, in advance often with little control over individual transactions. Parents. Often have difficulty gauging how long the money should last if spent, wisely.

"This may lead children to generally greater. Spending on lunch, "the researchers report.

, The results the researchers add have important, implications for schools and. Child obesity.A small number of schools have introduced debit systems that allow parents to regulate, daily spending which can help combat. The problem. If the use of cash as opposed, to debit cards can nudge, a student into making slightly, healthier choices. Then perhaps a "cash-for-cookies",, "policy for example would encourage students to think twice before making, their selection"Said Just and Wansink.

The study," School Lunch Debit Card Payment Systems Are Associated With Lower Nutrition and Higher. Calories, "was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
 
ภาษาอื่น ๆ
การสนับสนุนเครื่องมือแปลภาษา: กรีก, กันนาดา, กาลิเชียน, คลิงออน, คอร์สิกา, คาซัค, คาตาลัน, คินยารวันดา, คีร์กิซ, คุชราต, จอร์เจีย, จีน, จีนดั้งเดิม, ชวา, ชิเชวา, ซามัว, ซีบัวโน, ซุนดา, ซูลู, ญี่ปุ่น, ดัตช์, ตรวจหาภาษา, ตุรกี, ทมิฬ, ทาจิก, ทาทาร์, นอร์เวย์, บอสเนีย, บัลแกเรีย, บาสก์, ปัญจาป, ฝรั่งเศส, พาชตู, ฟริเชียน, ฟินแลนด์, ฟิลิปปินส์, ภาษาอินโดนีเซี, มองโกเลีย, มัลทีส, มาซีโดเนีย, มาราฐี, มาลากาซี, มาลายาลัม, มาเลย์, ม้ง, ยิดดิช, ยูเครน, รัสเซีย, ละติน, ลักเซมเบิร์ก, ลัตเวีย, ลาว, ลิทัวเนีย, สวาฮิลี, สวีเดน, สิงหล, สินธี, สเปน, สโลวัก, สโลวีเนีย, อังกฤษ, อัมฮาริก, อาร์เซอร์ไบจัน, อาร์เมเนีย, อาหรับ, อิกโบ, อิตาลี, อุยกูร์, อุสเบกิสถาน, อูรดู, ฮังการี, ฮัวซา, ฮาวาย, ฮินดี, ฮีบรู, เกลิกสกอต, เกาหลี, เขมร, เคิร์ด, เช็ก, เซอร์เบียน, เซโซโท, เดนมาร์ก, เตลูกู, เติร์กเมน, เนปาล, เบงกอล, เบลารุส, เปอร์เซีย, เมารี, เมียนมา (พม่า), เยอรมัน, เวลส์, เวียดนาม, เอสเปอแรนโต, เอสโทเนีย, เฮติครีโอล, แอฟริกา, แอลเบเนีย, โคซา, โครเอเชีย, โชนา, โซมาลี, โปรตุเกส, โปแลนด์, โยรูบา, โรมาเนีย, โอเดีย (โอริยา), ไทย, ไอซ์แลนด์, ไอร์แลนด์, การแปลภาษา.

Copyright ©2024 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: