ตรวจสอบข้อมูลของเส้นทางที่ติดตั้ง

ตรวจสอบข้อมูลของเส้นทางที่ติดตั้ง

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

Check the information of the installed route.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

We first discuss the effect of the absorptance, but assume that the recombination is purely radiative. For a solar cell, the absorbed photon current and with it
the short-circuit current is proportional to the absorptance, but this absorptance
a(ℏω) has to be counted only for a layer from which the minority carriers are
able to reach the contacts without recombining. The thickness of this layer is
equal to their diffusion length. For an LED, according to Equation 3.102, the
emitted photon current is also proportional to the absorptance and again this
absorptance is counted for a layer that is filled by minority carriers, when they
are injected through their selective contact. The thickness of this layer is equal to
the diffusion length. Although, the photon current, either absorbed or emitted,
is directly proportional to a(ℏω) for both devices, an absorptance a(ℏω) < 1
affects solar cells and LEDs differently. For a solar cell, nonabsorbed photons
are lost and result in a proportionate loss of the short-circuit current and of
the efficiency. For an LED, a(ℏω) < 1 means that less photons are emitted than
would be possible for the given voltage, but the charge current is accordingly
smaller, since only the electron–hole pairs that recombine have to be replenished
by the charge current. There is no direct loss involved. The photon current can
be raised to the ideal value expected for a(ℏω) = 1 by supplying a little more
energy, by raising the voltage in Equation 3.102 by an amount of kT/e ln(1/a).
So, if for an organic absorber/emitter, a(ℏω) = 0.01, a solar cell would have an
efficiency that is roughly smaller by a factor of 100 than the ideal efficiency and is
unacceptably small, whereas for a LED, the small absorptance of this material is
fully compensated by an additional voltage of only 120 mV.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

Check installation path