Other intellectual justifications for the New Public Man-agement evolved as well. These justifications, as Lynn (1996) notes, largely came from the “public policy” schools that developed in the l97Os and from the “managerialist” movement around the world (Pollitt l990). Kaboolian notes that the New Public Management relies on “market-like arrangements such as competition within units of govem-ment and across government boundaries to the non-profit and for-profit sectors. Performance bonuses, and penalties (to) loosen the inefficient monopoly franchise of public agencies and public employees" (1998, 190). Elaborating this point, Hood writes that the New Public Management moves away from traditional modes of legitimizing the public bureaucracy, such as procedural safeguards on ad-ministrative discretion, in favor of “trust in the market and private business methods ideas couched in the lan-guage of economic rationalism” (1995, 94).
ผลลัพธ์ (
แอฟริกา) 1:
[สำเนา]คัดลอก!
Ander intellektuele regverdiging vir die New Public Man-bestuur ontwikkel as well. Hierdie motivering, soos Lynn (1996) notas, grootliks uit die "openbare beleid" skole wat in die l97Os en van die "managerialism" beweging in die wêreld (Pollitt l990) ontwikkel. Kaboolian wys daarop dat die Nuwe Openbare Bestuur berus op "mark-agtige reëlings soos mededinging in eenhede van owar-ment en in die regering grense aan die nie-wins en winsgewende sektore. Prestasie bonusse en boetes (te) maak die inef fi kend monopolie franchise van openbare agentskappe en openbare werknemers "(1998, 190). Uitbreiding hierdie punt, Hood skryf dat die Nuwe Openbare Bestuur wegbeweeg van die tradisionele vorme van legitimiteit van die openbare burokrasie, soos. proses voorsorgmaatreëls op advertensie-ministrative diskresie ten gunste van "vertroue in die mark en private besigheid metodes om idees gaan lê in die lan-taal nie van ekonomiese rasionalisme" (1995, 94).
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
