Response sheets from eighty nine pa

Response sheets from eighty nine panelists were summed up to get the sums of sensory scores for quality attributes of chhana podo samples (Table 2) and those of quality attributes of chhana podo in general (Table 3). Table 4 shows the similarity values of overall ranking of chhana podo samples. For Sample 1, similarity values under "Not satisfactory," "Fair," "Medium," "Good" and "Excellent" were 0.106, 0.544, 0.836, 0.483, 0.0712 and 0.000 respectively. The highest similarity value, 0.836 was under the "Satisfactory" category; this implied that the overall quality of Sample 1 was

Response sheets from eighty nine panelists were summed up to get the sums of sensory scores for quality attributes of chhana podo samples (Table 2) and those of quality attributes of chhana podo in general (Table 3). Table 4 shows the similarity values ​​of overall ranking of chhana podo samples. For Sample 1, similarity values ​​under "Not satisfactory," "Fair," "Medium," "Good" and "Excellent" were 0.106, 0.544, 0.836, 0.483, 0.0712 and 0.000 respectively. The highest similarity value, 0.836 was under the "Satisfactory" category; this implied that the overall quality of Sample 1 was.

Response sheets from eighty nine panelists were summed up to get the sums of sensory scores for quality attributes of chhana. Podo samples (Table 2) and those of quality attributes of chhana podo in general (Table 3). Table 4 shows the similarity. Values of overall ranking of chhana podo samples. For, Sample 1 similarity values under ", Not satisfactory." "Fair,", "Medium. "" Good. "And" Excellent. "Were 0.106 0.544 0.836,,,, 0.483 0.0712 and 0.000 respectively. The highest similarity value 0.836 was,, Under the "Satisfactory." category; this implied that the overall quality of Sample 1 was.