Pigs are susceptible to a wide rang

Pigs are susceptible to a wide range of diseases that affect productivity and, de facto, the producer’s income, whether he/she is a large-scale commercial producer or has just one scavenging pig. The 2009 influenza pandemic caused by a new strain of H1N1, was a timely reminder of the risks for human health related to livestock production – the same livestock, including pigs, that supports the livelihoods and food security of almost a billion people.
Among the solutions required to minimize the risk of disease spread, the strengthening of biosecurity in pig production and marketing chains is a priority. It does not reduce the need for appropriate preparedness plans and adequate resources to control disease out- breaks once they occur, but it is proactive, has a preventive impact and enables producers to protect their assets.
A thorough knowledge of pig disease epidemiology and the routes of disease trans- mission has enabled specialized institutions, public services and producers themselves to develop biosecurity measures for the pig sector. Some of these measures are applicable across all production systems, while others are not. Each production system requires a spe- cific set of biosecurity measures, and although decision-makers should not compromise on public health, all initiatives taken to strengthen biosecurity in pig production must consider the technical and financial consequences that implementation of these measures will have for individual stakeholders. The social and economic impacts of closing farms that cannot comply with the required level of biosecurity must also be carefully assessed, and appropri- ate accompaniment measures must be in place.
Further work is required to identify and describe the direct interests of the producers and other stakeholders involved in the production and marketing chain and the interest of society in general.
The private sector can and will implement biosecurity measures when these comply with its own will or interests. Other measures require appropriate regulations, incentives and enforcement capacity. Mutual trust between the public and private sectors is essential. For zoonotic diseases, pre-emptive discussions among public health agencies, agricultural departments, veterinary services and the pig industry should be organized to ensure mutual understanding and cooperation in the interest of society in general. Strengthened collabo- ration between public services and the private sector is crucial for better disease control.
The key to changing behaviours/practices in relation to enhanced biosecurity lies in peo- ple’s perceptions of the level of risk and the resources available at the production level. For meaningful change to take place in rural communities, a holistic, multi-sectoral approach is required to identify critical risk points for disease spread and to understand the evolution of diseases in specific environments, the impacts of diseases on people and the impact that people have or can have on diseases. The promotion of appropriate sustainable biosecurity measures in scavenging and small-scale confined production systems requires the use of participatory methodologies and a well-designed communication strategy.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

Pigs are susceptible to a wide range of diseases that affect productivity and, de facto, the producer's income, whether he / she is a large-scale commercial producer or has just one scavenging pig. The in 2009 influenza Pandemic caused by a New strain of H1N1, was a timely Reminder of the risks for Human Health related to Livestock Production - the Same Livestock, including pigs, that SUPPORTS the livelihoods and Food Security of Almost a billion people.
Among the Solutions. required to minimize the risk of disease spread, the strengthening of biosecurity in pig production and marketing chains is a priority. It does not Reduce the Need for appropriate and adequate plans Preparedness Resources to Control Breaks Out disease once they occur, but it is proactive, has a Preventive Impact and enables producers to Protect their Assets.
A thorough Knowledge of Pig disease Epidemiology and the routes. of disease trans- mission has enabled specialized institutions, public services and producers themselves to develop biosecurity measures for the pig sector. Some of these measures are applicable across all production systems, while others are not. Each production system requires a spe- cific set of biosecurity measures, and although decision-makers should not compromise on public health, all initiatives taken to strengthen biosecurity in pig production must consider the technical and financial consequences that implementation of these measures will have for individual. stakeholders. The social and Economic impacts of Closing Farms that Can not comply with the required level of Biosecurity must also be carefully Assessed, and Appropri- ATE accompaniment measures must be in Place.
Further Work is required to Identify and describe the Direct interests of the producers and Other. Production and Marketing stakeholders involved in the chain and the interest of Society in general.
The private Sector Can and Will IMPLEMENT Biosecurity measures when these comply with its own interests or Will. Other measures require appropriate regulations, incentives and enforcement capacity. Mutual trust between the public and private sectors is essential. For zoonotic diseases, pre-emptive discussions among public health agencies, agricultural departments, veterinary services and the pig industry should be organized to ensure mutual understanding and cooperation in the interest of society in general. Collaborative strengthened ration between the private and Public Services Sector is CRUCIAL for better disease Control.
The Key to changing behaviors / Enhanced Biosecurity Practices in relation to Lies in Peo- PLE's perceptions of the level of risk and the Resources available at the Production level. For meaningful change to take place in rural communities, a holistic, multi-sectoral approach is required to identify critical risk points for disease spread and to understand the evolution of diseases in specific environments, the impacts of diseases on people and the impact that people have. or can have on diseases. The promotion of appropriate sustainable biosecurity measures in scavenging and small-scale confined production systems requires the use of participatory methodologies and a well-designed communication strategy.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

Pigs are susceptible to a wide range of diseases that affect and productivity, facto De, producer the ', s income whether. He / she is a large-scale commercial producer or has just one scavenging pig. The 2009 influenza pandemic caused by a new. Strain, of H1N1 was a timely reminder of the risks for human health related to livestock production - the, same livestock. Including, pigsThat supports the livelihoods and food security of almost a billion people.
Among the solutions required to minimize the. Risk of disease spread the strengthening, of biosecurity in pig production and marketing chains is a priority. It does not. Reduce the need for appropriate preparedness plans and adequate resources to control disease out - breaks once, they occur. But it, is proactiveHas a preventive impact and enables producers to protect their assets.
A thorough knowledge of pig disease epidemiology. And the routes of disease trans - mission has enabled, specialized institutions public services and producers themselves. To develop biosecurity measures for the pig sector. Some of these measures are applicable across all, production systems. While others are not.Each production system requires a spe - cific set of, biosecurity measures and although decision-makers should not compromise. On, public health all initiatives taken to strengthen biosecurity in pig production must consider the technical and financial. Consequences that implementation of these measures will have for individual stakeholders.The social and economic impacts of closing farms that cannot comply with the required level of biosecurity must also be. Carefully, assessed and appropri - ate accompaniment measures must be in place.
Further work is required to identify and. Describe the direct interests of the producers and other stakeholders involved in the production and marketing chain and. The interest of society in general.
.The private sector can and will implement biosecurity measures when these comply with its own will or interests. Other. Measures require appropriate regulations incentives and, enforcement capacity. Mutual trust between the public and private. Sectors is essential. For zoonotic diseases pre-emptive discussions, among public health agencies agricultural departments,,Veterinary services and the pig industry should be organized to ensure mutual understanding and cooperation in the interest. Of society in general. Strengthened collabo - ration between public services and the private sector is crucial for better. Disease control.
.The key to changing behaviours / practices in relation to enhanced biosecurity lies in peo - ple 's perceptions of the level. Of risk and the resources available at the production level. For meaningful change to take place in, rural communities a. Holistic.Multi-sectoral approach is required to identify critical risk points for disease spread and to understand the evolution. Of diseases in specific environments the impacts, of diseases on people and the impact that people have or can have on diseases.The promotion of appropriate sustainable biosecurity measures in scavenging and small-scale confined production systems. Requires the use of participatory methodologies and a well-designed communication strategy.