The purpose of blending polymers is
to obtain materials with additional
properties and minimum sacrifice of
their original properties [1-2]. An
immiscible blended polymer system
usually has a microstructure with the
phase separation between components.
This system, therefore, is a
new polymeric material with the special
features of each polymer. In
immiscible polymer blends, the
major component forms a continuous
matrix while the dispersed one
assumes different forms (droplet,rod, fibril, or lamella) [3]. For improving strength and
stability of the interface in the immiscible polymer
blends, interface modifiers are added It has been reported that the melt spinning of immiscible
polymer blends into fibres with improved properties
is of great interest in synthetic fibres industry [5].
Immiscible polymers may provide unexpected, particularly
in the field of rheology . Brody [6] found that
small amounts of immiscible polymers can lower the
orientation of PET, nylon 66, and polypropylene fibres
at high speed wind-up. He believed that the mechanism
governing wind-up speed suppression takes place in the
spinning threadline connected deformation of globules
into microfibrils. The viscosity may be lower than pure
component over a broad concentration range, as had
been found by Han [7,8] for polystyrene/ polypropylene
and polystyrene/high density polyethylene blends.However, there is the very curious behaviour that is
becoming increasingly evident in the literature that
small amounts of one polymer are added to another.
This produce the large decrease in the shear viscosity of
the major component as measured by capillary and
rotational rheometers. The viscosity of polypropylene
can be reduced by small additions of various polymers
[6], e.g., adding about 2% of polycarbonate gives a particularly
large drop of viscosity nearly 70% [6]. Lipatov
[9] has found that small amounts of polycarbonate
give a large decrease in the viscosity of polystyrene,
and he also studied a number of other immiscible polymers
and found similar behaviour [10]. Utracki [11]
has also found similar behaviour for small concentration
of nylon 66 in polyethylene terephthalate. It was
found that small additions of thermotropic liquid crystal
polymers lowered the viscosity of various polymers,
which facilitates injection moulding Blends of PP and nylon 6 (N6) have received much
attention in recent years [13]. PP and N6 are immiscible
polymers when combined, it leads to materials with
improved chemical and mechanical characteristics.
PP-g-MAH has been shown to be an effective compatibilizer
for the system [14]. The elongation force field
in melt spinning process has been found to be more
effective in producing fibrillar morphology than the
shear force field present in extrusion and moulding
processes [15].
Takahashi et al. [16] studied the effect of viscosity
ratio of both polymers on the structure of PP/N6 fibres.
They proposed that for a polyblend fibre having viscosity
ratio greater than 1 the crystal orientation of PP was
considerably lower than that what they observed when
the viscosity ratio was less than 1. They investigated
[17] the effect of drawing on the structure and physical
properties (tensile strength and elongation) of the
PP/N6 polyblend fibres. They found the N6 was hardly
affected by drawing ratio and blending ratios, but the
PP component exhibited a higher crystallinity by drawing
and the increment of PP crystalline orientation in the
blend fibres through drawing was smaller than that of
the PP fibres. Also, they examined the effect of the
fractions of PP and N6 components on the creep characteristics
of the fibre [18].Grof et al. [19] showed that by the addition of interface
modifier, PP-g-MAH, fibre extrusion process
became more effective and the properties of the fibres
(tenacity and modulus) improved. These researchers
also examined the effect of drawing on the physical
properties of PP/N6 fibres in which N6 fraction was
varied over 0-10 wt% [20-21]. Grof et al. [20] reported
the decreasing of amorphous orientation factor of PP up
to 3 wt% of N6. They also found that the decrease of
average orientation occurs predominantly due to the
decrease in the orientation of amorphous domains and
there is only a weak increase of crystallinity orientation
in the crystalline domains [21]. Liang et al. [22] investigated
the effect of extruding PP/N6 through a capillary
rheometer on the rheology and phase morphology
and also studied the development of structure during
melt spinning of fibres.In this work, blend filaments were produced from
PP and N6 containing 0 and 10 % wt of N6 and 0 % wt
of PP-g-MAH, in one set and, 10 and 20% wt of N6
with 5 % wt of PP-g-MAH, in another set. The melt
spun filaments were taken up at two different speeds,
namely 300 and 800 m/min. For studying the effect of
drawing on orientation of the crystalline and amorphous
regions of PP and N6 phases, the blend filaments
were drawn at two draw ratios i.e., 3.5 X for filaments
extruded at 300 m/min and 2 X for filaments extruded
at 800 m/min. For calculating orientation factors in the
amorphous regions of PP and N6 of the blend filaments,
2 different methods were used involving different
assumptions. The orientation factor of crystalline
regions was determined by a wide angle X-ray diffraction
(WAXD) unit.
The purpose of blending polymers isto obtain materials with additionalproperties and minimum sacrifice oftheir original properties [1-2]. Animmiscible blended polymer systemusually has a microstructure with thephase separation between components.This system, therefore, is anew polymeric material with the specialfeatures of each polymer. Inimmiscible polymer blends, themajor component forms a continuousmatrix while the dispersed oneassumes different forms (droplet,rod, fibril, or lamella) [3]. For improving strength andstability of the interface in the immiscible polymerblends, interface modifiers are added It has been reported that the melt spinning of immisciblepolymer blends into fibres with improved propertiesis of great interest in synthetic fibres industry [5].Immiscible polymers may provide unexpected, particularlyin the field of rheology . Brody [6] found thatsmall amounts of immiscible polymers can lower theorientation of PET, nylon 66, and polypropylene fibresat high speed wind-up. He believed that the mechanismgoverning wind-up speed suppression takes place in thespinning threadline connected deformation of globulesinto microfibrils. The viscosity may be lower than purecomponent over a broad concentration range, as hadbeen found by Han [7,8] for polystyrene/ polypropyleneand polystyrene/high density polyethylene blends.However, there is the very curious behaviour that isbecoming increasingly evident in the literature thatsmall amounts of one polymer are added to another.This produce the large decrease in the shear viscosity ofthe major component as measured by capillary androtational rheometers. The viscosity of polypropylenecan be reduced by small additions of various polymers[6], e.g., adding about 2% of polycarbonate gives a particularlylarge drop of viscosity nearly 70% [6]. Lipatov[9] has found that small amounts of polycarbonategive a large decrease in the viscosity of polystyrene,and he also studied a number of other immiscible polymersand found similar behaviour [10]. Utracki [11]has also found similar behaviour for small concentrationof nylon 66 in polyethylene terephthalate. It wasfound that small additions of thermotropic liquid crystalpolymers lowered the viscosity of various polymers,which facilitates injection moulding Blends of PP and nylon 6 (N6) have received muchattention in recent years [13]. PP and N6 are immisciblepolymers when combined, it leads to materials withimproved chemical and mechanical characteristics.PP-g-MAH has been shown to be an effective compatibilizerfor the system [14]. The elongation force fieldin melt spinning process has been found to be moreeffective in producing fibrillar morphology than theshear force field present in extrusion and mouldingprocesses [15].Takahashi et al. [16] studied the effect of viscosityratio of both polymers on the structure of PP/N6 fibres.They proposed that for a polyblend fibre having viscosityratio greater than 1 the crystal orientation of PP wasconsiderably lower than that what they observed whenthe viscosity ratio was less than 1. They investigated[17] the effect of drawing on the structure and physicalproperties (tensile strength and elongation) of thePP/N6 polyblend fibres. They found the N6 was hardlyaffected by drawing ratio and blending ratios, but thePP component exhibited a higher crystallinity by drawingand the increment of PP crystalline orientation in theblend fibres through drawing was smaller than that ofthe PP fibres. Also, they examined the effect of thefractions of PP and N6 components on the creep characteristicsof the fibre [18].Grof et al. [19] showed that by the addition of interfacemodifier, PP-g-MAH, fibre extrusion processbecame more effective and the properties of the fibres(tenacity and modulus) improved. These researchersalso examined the effect of drawing on the physicalproperties of PP/N6 fibres in which N6 fraction wasvaried over 0-10 wt% [20-21]. Grof et al. [20] reportedthe decreasing of amorphous orientation factor of PP upto 3 wt% of N6. They also found that the decrease ofaverage orientation occurs predominantly due to thedecrease in the orientation of amorphous domains andthere is only a weak increase of crystallinity orientationin the crystalline domains [21]. Liang et al. [22] investigatedthe effect of extruding PP/N6 through a capillaryrheometer on the rheology and phase morphologyand also studied the development of structure duringmelt spinning of fibres.In this work, blend filaments were produced fromPP and N6 containing 0 and 10 % wt of N6 and 0 % wtof PP-g-MAH, in one set and, 10 and 20% wt of N6with 5 % wt of PP-g-MAH, in another set. The meltspun filaments were taken up at two different speeds,namely 300 and 800 m/min. For studying the effect ofdrawing on orientation of the crystalline and amorphousregions of PP and N6 phases, the blend filamentswere drawn at two draw ratios i.e., 3.5 X for filamentsextruded at 300 m/min and 2 X for filaments extrudedat 800 m/min. For calculating orientation factors in theamorphous regions of PP and N6 of the blend filaments,2 different methods were used involving differentassumptions. The orientation factor of crystallineregions was determined by a wide angle X-ray diffraction(WAXD) unit.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
![](//thimg.ilovetranslation.com/pic/loading_3.gif?v=b9814dd30c1d7c59_8619)
The purpose of blending Polymers is
to obtain Materials with additional
properties and Minimum sacrifice of
their Original properties [1-2]. An
immiscible blended Polymer System
usually has a microstructure with the
Phase Separation between components.
This System, therefore, is a
polymeric New Material with the special
features of each Polymer. In
Polymer Blends immiscible, the
Major Component Forms a continuous
Matrix while the dispersed one
different Assumes Forms (Droplet, Rod, fibril, or Lamella) [3]. For improving strength and
stability of the interface in the immiscible Polymer
Blends, interface modifiers are added It has been reported that the melt Spinning of immiscible
Polymer Blends Into Fibres with improved properties
is of Great interest in synthetic Fibres Industry [5].
immiscible Polymers May. Unexpected provide, particularly
in the field of Rheology. Brody [6] Found that
Small amounts of immiscible Polymers Can Lower the
orientation of PET, nylon 66, and polypropylene Fibres
at High Wind-up speed. He believed that the mechanism
Governing Wind-up speed suppression Takes Place in the
deformation of globules Connected Threadline Spinning
Into microfibrils. May be Lower than the viscosity Pure
Component concentration over a Broad Range, as had
been Found by Han [7,8] for polystyrene / polypropylene
and polystyrene / High density polyethylene Blends.However, there is the very curious behavior that is
becoming increasingly evident. in the literature that
Small amounts of Polymer are added to one another.
This decrease in the shear viscosity Produce the Large of
the Major Component as measured by capillary and
rotational rheometers. The viscosity of polypropylene
Can be reduced by Small Additions of Various Polymers
[6], eg, adding About 2% of polycarbonate gives a particularly
viscosity Large Drop of nearly 70% [6]. Lipatov
[9] Small amounts of polycarbonate that has Found
Large give a decrease in the viscosity of polystyrene,
and He also studied a Number of Other immiscible Polymers
and Found similar behavior [10]. Utracki [11]
has also Found similar behavior for Small concentration
of nylon 66 in polyethylene Terephthalate. It was
Thermotropic Liquid Crystal Found that Small Additions of
Polymers lowered the viscosity of Various Polymers,
which Facilitates Injection Moulding Blends of PP and nylon 6 (N6) have received much
Attention in recent years [13]. PP and N6 are immiscible
Polymers when combined, it Leads to Materials with
Chemical and Mechanical characteristics improved.
PP-G-MAH has been shown to be an effective Compatibilizer
for the System [14]. The elongation Force field
in melt Spinning Process has been Found to be more
effective in producing Fibrillar morphology than the
shear Force field present in Moulding and extrusion
processes [15].
Takahashi et al. [16] studied the Effect of viscosity
ratio of both Polymers on the structure of PP / N6 Fibres.
They Proposed that for a Polyblend Fibre having viscosity
ratio Greater than 1 the Crystal orientation of PP was
considerably Lower than that what they observed when
the viscosity. ratio was less than 1. They investigated
[17] Drawing on the Effect of the structure and physical
properties (tensile strength and elongation) of the
PP / N6 Polyblend Fibres. Hardly they Found the N6 was
affected by Drawing ratio and blending ratios, but the
PP Component exhibited a higher crystallinity by Drawing
and the increment of PP crystalline orientation in the
Blend Fibres was smaller than that of Drawing Through
the PP Fibres. Also, they examined the Effect of the
fractions of PP and N6 components on the Creep characteristics
of the Fibre [18] .Grof et al. [19] Showed that by the addition of interface
modifier, PP-G-MAH, Fibre extrusion Process
became more effective and the properties of the Fibres
(tenacity and modulus) improved. These researchers
also examined the Effect of Drawing on the physical
properties of PP / N6 N6 Fibres in which fraction was
varied over WT 0-10% [20-21]. Grof et al. [20] reported
the decreasing of amorphous orientation factor of PP up
to 3% of WT N6. They also Found that the decrease of
average orientation occurs predominantly Due to the
decrease in the orientation of amorphous domains and
there is only a weak increase of crystallinity orientation
in the crystalline domains [21]. Liang et al. [22] investigated
the Effect of extruding PP / N6 Through a capillary
rheometer on the Rheology and morphology Phase
of Development and also studied the structure during
melt Spinning of this Fibres.In Work, Blend filaments were produced from
PP and N6 containing 0 and 10. WT% and 0% of N6 WT
of PP-G-MAH, in one and SET, 10 and 20% of N6 WT
WT with 5% of PP-G-MAH, in another SET. The melt
spun filaments were taken up at Two different speeds,
namely 300 and 800 M / min. For studying the Effect of
Drawing on orientation of the crystalline and amorphous
Regions of PP and N6 phases, the Blend filaments
were drawn at Two draw ratios IE, 3.5 X for filaments
extruded at 300 M / min and 2 X for filaments extruded
at 800 M. / min. Factors for calculating orientation in the
amorphous Regions of PP and N6 of the filaments Blend,
2 different methods were used involving different
assumptions. The crystalline orientation factor of
Regions was determined by X-ray diffraction a Wide Angle
(WAXD) UNIT.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
![](//thimg.ilovetranslation.com/pic/loading_3.gif?v=b9814dd30c1d7c59_8619)
The purpose of blending polymers is
to obtain materials with additional
properties and minimum sacrifice of
their original. Properties [1-2]. An
immiscible blended polymer system
usually has a microstructure with the
phase separation between components.
This. ,, system therefore is a
new polymeric material with the special
features of each polymer. In
immiscible, polymer blends. The
.Major component forms a continuous
matrix while the dispersed one
assumes different forms (,,, droplet rod fibril or lamella). []. For 3 improving strength and
stability of the interface in the immiscible polymer
blends interface modifiers, are added. It has been reported that the melt spinning of immiscible
polymer blends into fibres with improved properties
.Is of great interest in synthetic fibres industry [5].
Immiscible polymers may, provide unexpected particularly
in the. Field of rheology. Brody [] found 6 that
small amounts of immiscible polymers can lower the
orientation of PET nylon 66 and,,, Polypropylene fibres
at high speed wind-up. He believed that the mechanism
governing wind-up speed suppression takes place. In the
.Spinning threadline connected deformation of globules
into microfibrils. The viscosity may be lower than pure
component. Over a broad, concentration range as had
been found by Han [,] for 7 8 polystyrene / polypropylene
and polystyrene / high density. Polyethylene blends.However there is, the very curious behaviour that is
becoming increasingly evident in the literature. That
.Small amounts of one polymer are added to another.
This produce the large decrease in the shear viscosity of
the major. Component as measured by capillary and
rotational rheometers. The viscosity of polypropylene
can be reduced by small additions. Of various polymers
[], e.g 6, adding about 2% of polycarbonate gives a particularly
large drop of viscosity nearly 6 70% [].). Lipatov
.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
![](//thimg.ilovetranslation.com/pic/loading_3.gif?v=b9814dd30c1d7c59_8619)