Garbage problem in viewing the community impact more broadly if there is no proper management. Therefore, learn about the participation of citizens in waste management schemes in the community is necessary. The objective is to study the model of managing solid waste by the citizens in the Community House. Km 26 on coming to participate in order to analyze trends, to the participation of citizens in managing solid waste for the relationship between personal information and knowledge about waste, with a tendency to come and participate and to analyze solid waste management policy by.Use a mixture of research, qualitative research with quantitative research. Sub group meeting 3 times and asked the people of the community who doves 287 mad m 26 in the eyes no Pu te nung Ella STA district in Yala Province. A qualitative analysis of the data by category of content. Quantitative data analysis section for hypothesis testing and CAI percent square. The results showed that the pattern of solid waste management in the community crazy bird m, 26 in which seven people, there is a bank 1) 2) forms of waste garbage into recycling or utilization 3) forms of compost 4) garbage House non-contest format 5) cleaning time.Big 6) or regulation/rule out adjusting the garbage throw/catch/on and 7). Planting pattern of awareness, litter. The results of the analysis of the trend came in the participation of citizens in waste management. I found that the people most likely to come to participate in waste management (79.79%) find that the relationship between personal information and knowledge about waste, with a tendency to come and participate, the No. For solid waste management policy in the critical community, namely "public participation supporting meetings tambon administration 26 in non-ethnic m trash" to handling waste in the crazy bird community m. 26 in can be done continuously by the response pattern to solid waste management.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..