We report the growth of ZnO nanowir

We report the growth of ZnO nanowires on ZnO:Ga/glass templates and the fabrication of laterally grown ZnO nanowire ethanol sensors. It was
found that growth direction of the nanowires depends strongly on growth parameters. It was also found that resistivity of the fabricated sensor
decreased upon ethanol gas injection. By introducing 1500 ppm ethanol gas, it was found that the device response were around 20%, 35%, 58% and
61% when the gas sensor was operated at 180 ◦C, 230 ◦C, 260 ◦C and 300 ◦C, respectively. It was also found that the device response at 300 ◦C were
around 18%, 26%, 43%, 55% and 61% when the concentration of injected ethanol gas was 50 ppm, 100 ppm, 500 ppm, 1000 ppm and 1500 ppm,
respectively.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

We report the growth of ZnO nanowires on ZnO: Ga / glass templates and the fabrication of laterally grown ZnO nanowire ethanol sensors. It was
Found that growth direction of the nanowires depends strongly on growth Parameters. It was also Found that of the Resistivity sensor fabricated
upon Decreased Gas ethanol injection. By introducing the 1500th PPM Gas ethanol, it was that the Device Found Around 20% were response, 35%, 58% and
61% when the sensor was operated at 180 ° C Gas, 230 ° C, 260 ° C and 300 ° C,. respectively. It was also that the Device Found response at 300 ° C were
Around 18%, 26%, 43%, 55% and 61% when the concentration of ethanol Gas was injected 50 PPM, 100 PPM, 500 PPM, the one thousandth and one thousand five hundred PPM PPM. ,
respectively.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

We report the growth of ZnO nanowires on ZnO: Ga / glass templates and the fabrication of laterally grown ZnO nanowire ethanol. Sensors. It was.Found that growth direction of the nanowires depends strongly on growth parameters. It was also found that resistivity. Of the fabricated sensor.Decreased upon ethanol gas injection. By introducing 1500 ppm, ethanol gas it was found that the device response were around 20% 35% 58% and,,,61% when the gas sensor was operated at 180 C cream, cream, cream 230 C 260 C and 300 education level, C respectively. It was also found that the device. Response at 300 cream C were.,,, around 18% 26% 43% 55% and 61% when the concentration of injected ethanol gas was 50 ppm 100 ppm, 500 ppm 1000 ppm,,, And, 1500 ppmRespectively.