ฉันรักแปลIs GM the answer?some, gen

ฉันรักแปลIs GM the answer?some, genetically modified (GM) food represents a key element in the fight against hunger and disease. It offers the world a bright new future free from famine and illness. Yet for other, the GM route is a reckless road we are being forced down by big business, which may have disastrous consequences for the planet and our safety. So, who are we to believe? Well, in this month’s issue, we take a closer
look at this controversial and divisive topic.

For supporters argue that for farmers, and indeed for all of us, the advantages of GM crops are overwhelming: GM crops are resistant to pests, resulting in better quality plants that yield bigger harvests.Drought-resistant and cold-resistant GM crops can help secure a reliable food supply in even the most inhospitable weather conditions. So, more food for everyone! And that’s
important, proponents say, as hundreds of millions of people around the world are already suffering from hunger, and by 2050, the population of the world will probably have increased to over nine billion. How else are we to feed the
World we have a responsibility to feed the earth’s poor and hungry and GM crops offer the only realistic way of preventing mass starvation. What’s more, supporters argue that GM crops can provide improved nutrition to
help fight disease and illness. They talk of tomatoes that could be capable of preventing cancer, and staples like rice and potatoes that could be boosted in nutrients to perhaps give a whole day’s nourishment in a
single. So, GM production means healthier food delivered in a more efficient, environmentally friendly way that helps us deal with the population challenges of tomorrow.

AGAINST
Not surprising, the development of GM crops does have its critics. The potential risks, they claim, cannot be ignored. The chemicals that are needed to grow GM crops can be harmful to animals and insects, and so disturb the food
chain. They fear the emergence of “superbugs” capable of withstanding any pesticides. Farmers worry about genetic transfer, where GM crops could escape and crossbreed with wild plants. They say there could be no way
back from such contamination. Opponents of GM crops also point to
their unknown effects on humans. They say we cannot be sure exactly how these designer crops will affect us in the long term. They also argue that
the advantages have been grossly exaggerated and point to some studies that show GM crops deliver lower yields than conventionally grown crops. Others worry about the potential grip of big business on farming. They claim that GM crops are being pushed by multinational biotech companies purely for profit reasons. They worry about Genetic Use Restriction Technology (GURT)
-where a so-called “Terminator” gene can be introduced to crops, so that no seeds are produced and farmers have to buy fresh seeds each year from the
manufacturer. Although only a theoretical possibility at present, many fear the introduction of GURT in the future.

There’s one thing we can be sure of: more GM developments are on the way. Proponents talk of bananas that contain vaccines against infectious diseases, geneticall y modified fish that grow more quickly, and cloned animals for food.

While many fear such “Frankenstein foods,” as long as there is a demand, GM food production will continue to flourish. Today, the U.S. and Argentina grow the majority of GM crops (mainly soybean, corn, and cotton). Tomorrow, perhaps all our fruit and vegetables, even the meat we eat, will be genetically modified.

ผลลัพธ์ (แอฟริกา) 1:

Ek is lief vir vertaal Is GM die antwoord? Sommige, geneties gemodifiseerde (GM) voedsel verteenwoordig 'n belangrike element in die stryd teen honger en siekte. Dit bied die wêreld 'n blink nuwe toekoms vry van hongersnood en siekte. Maar vir ander, die roete GM is. 'n roekelose Road ons word deur groot besigheid, wat rampspoedige gevolge vir die planeet en ons veiligheid Mag het gedwing. So, wie is ons om te glo? Wel, in hierdie maand se uitgawe, ons neem 'n nader
kyk na hierdie kontroversiële en verdelende Forum. . vir ondersteuners argumenteer dat vir boere, en inderdaad vir ons almal, die voordele van GM-gewasse is oorweldigend: GM-gewasse is bestand teen peste, wat lei tot 'n beter gehalte Plante wat opbrengs-bestand en koue-bestand Bigger Harvests.Drought Kan GM gewasse. help om veilig 'n betroubare kosvoorraad in selfs die mees onherbergsame weerstoestande. so, meer kos vir almal! en dit is belangrik, voorstanders sê, as honderde miljoene mense regoor die wêreld reeds ly as gevolg van honger, en deur die 2050, die bevolking van. die wêreld sal waarskynlik toegeneem tot meer as nege miljard. Hoe anders is ons om te voed die wêreld waarin ons het 'n verantwoordelikheid om te voed die aarde se arm en honger en GM-gewasse Bied die enigste realistiese manier om massa hongersnood. wat meer is, ondersteuners argumenteer dat GM. gewasse kan verbeterde voeding te verskaf help beveg siekte en siekte. Hulle praat van Tamaties wat in staat is om te verhoed dat kanker kan, en krammetjies soos rys en aartappels wat in voedingstowwe kan 'n hupstoot kry om miskien gee Voeding 'n hele dag in 'n enkele. So, GM. produksie beteken gesonder kos verskaf in 'n meer doeltreffende, omgewingsvriendelike manier wat ons help om met die bevolking uitdagings van môre. TEEN nie verbasend nie, die ontwikkeling van GM-gewasse het wel sy kritici. die potensiële risiko's, het hulle beweer, kan nie geïgnoreer word. die. chemikalieë wat nodig is om te groei GM gewasse kan skadelik vir diere en insekte, en so versteur die Food ketting. Hulle vrees dat die opkoms van "Super Bugs" kan weerstaan ​​enige Plaagdoders. Boere is bekommerd oor Genetiese oordrag, waar GM gewasse kan Escape en kruising. met wilde plante. hulle sê daar kan geen manier terug uit sodanige besoedeling. Teenstanders van GM-gewasse ook Wys na hul Unknown effekte op die mens. hulle sê ons kan nie seker presies hoe hierdie ontwerper gewasse sal ons raak in die lang termyn wees. hulle het ook. argumenteer dat die voordele erg oordrewe en Punt gewees het om 'n paar studies wat wys GM-gewasse Red laer opbrengste as konvensioneel gegroei gewasse. Ander is bekommerd oor die moontlike greep van Groot besigheid op boerdery. Hulle beweer dat GM-gewasse deur multinasionale Biotech maatskappye suiwer word gestoot. vir wins redes. Hulle is bekommerd oor Genetiese GEBRUIKSBEPERKING Tegnologie (GURT) -Waar 'n sogenaamde "Terminator" Gene ingestel kan word aan gewasse, sade geproduseer en sodat daar geen Boere moet Vars sade koop elke jaar vanaf die vervaardiger. Alhoewel. slegs 'n teoretiese moontlikheid op die oomblik, baie vrees die bekendstelling van GURT in die toekoms. Daar is een ding wat ons kan seker wees van: meer GM Developments is op die pad Voorstanders Talk piesangs dat entstowwe teen aansteeklike siektes bevat, Geneticall Y Gewysig Fish dat.. groei vinniger, en gekloonde diere vir kos. Terwyl baie vrees sulke "Frankenstein Voedsel," solank as wat daar 'n aanvraag is, sal GM Voedselproduksie voortgaan om te floreer. Vandag, die VSA en Argentinië groei die meerderheid van GM-gewasse (veral sojabone. , koring en katoen). Môre, miskien al ons vrugte en groente, selfs die vleis wat ons eet, sal geneties gemodifiseerde.