The death penalty The penalty is implemented in the Thai society for a long time. Since the early Ayutthaya period until now by saying that as a aims to punish punishment to substitute revenge. To make the mistake that was made. Moreover, the sanctions aimed at creating terror against people who think they do wrong. To achieve a veto will bring tranquility in society. The death penalty has been applied extensively, especially in the era of power by the Council of the revolution has been frequently applied the death penalty, including a prisoner in that incident upon arrest offenders. In the present. The concepts in the treatment of offenders has changed. The society began to look at the various factors in a society cast & forged discipline offenders with global human rights trends and a strong push from various human rights organizations, as well as the international cause to push for abolition of the death penalty to life. Although it is not yet considered a majority in Thai society, but it has been increasingly accepted, but at the same time it has a stream of opposition from within the country. Especially from a public that does not agree with the abolition of the death penalty to life. Therefore, Re: cancel the death penalty is an issue that has started to debate in Thai society more. The parties agree that should cancel the death penalty have commented that the death penalty has become as follows:The death penalty will occur in the justice system, but there is no margin to confirm without doubt that they were killed as guilty by accusation. This is not including those guilty of such an offense deserving or not. Even if people do wrong is real. There are many more cases where the innocent to death penalty or death and even in the United States since the death penalty was 2519 (1976) who want to be released, at least 113 people after a court found that he was innocent, There are also hundreds of other people who want lighter penalty but freedom for the same reason. These people survived because they had to resurrect a lawsuit by using modern technology to prove innocence, such as DNA. These figures make it believe that there are innocent before death and not less. Mistakes in the process of Justice, it is not avoided. Indeed, the innocent must be punished for their mistakes do not occur at all times. Because people in the justice system, human error plain because there are also restrictions on recognition. Also fall under bias, there are also coveting that defeat against the benefits that tampering conviction. Even the United States, which has named a high standard in the freedom they have been questioning whether there is discrimination. The arrest and confined to the death penalty because of racial bias. However, if an error in the decision was correct. It is also a story that is. If he is arrested, there are still confined, hope will be free. But if he is to death. If it is proven later that he is innocent, will not be able to revive him with the death penalty, thus making the justice system could not guarantee a fair and truly caring. Even the process of Justice, it is filled with inequality. The poor are difficult to access because of the high cost. It takes a long time) ฃ also benefits the rich more than rich people, no matter who takes advantage of the existing laws or the rich used to influence the law. That occurred in Thailand today to make sure that people want the death penalty for several offenses, both deserve it.From an analysis of the findings in the research about the death penalty, and the murder rate. This is a survey of the United Nations when the year 2531 (1988) and has been updated in recent years and mean 2545 (2002) 2539 (1996) concluded that existing research was unable to give evidence as a science that shows that the abolition of the veto affects life crimes rather than imprisonment for life, and there are no prospects that there will be evidence in support of its time near the evidence we found mostly. Does not support the hypothesis for commercial crime prevention. " The latest crime figures in the country that abolition of the death penalty. Does not indicate that the abolition of the death penalty, but negatively in any way, for example, in Canada the homicide rate per 100000 population had decreased from the highest figures in recent years 3.09 2518 (1975) prior to the abolition of the death penalty in the rest of the year, 2.41 2523 (1980) and it has a lower rate and in the year 2546 (2003) twenty-seven years after the abolition of the death penalty the death rate stood at 1.73 per 100000 population had less than a year to 44% 2518 (1975) and is considered the lowest in the past three decades, though this number will rise to 2.0 in the year 2548 (2005) can see that the death penalty is not in effect in such a way that make people restraint?In terms of the Buddhist view. Killing is contrary to the principles of Dharma teachings of Buddhism. The precepts that 1 is not allowed to kill people, or certain types of animals. Even the order or decision, death is regarded as the ideal Buddhist sin as killing or killing. Whether in any case because they believe there is a way to resolve the problem far better than killing. To encourage the coup d ' état check box, do one of. To increase the punishment for harder isn't cause fewer illegal workers. There are various measures that make it more likely offenders in custody and was convicted separately that crime decreased. Therefore, the time that Thai should cancel the death penalty and strengthen the justice system with the purity of Justice and more efficiently as well as improve the social economic conditions to promote people good and reduce the incentives to do evil. In this way, not only reduce the number of criminals only. If it makes people happy and cosy city house lives a truly peaceful.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..