The judge warned people like chat good model has been terminated may bad luck made without prior notice. If chat time in the job taphloen the case, for example, that employees sue the employer terminated without telling the Supreme Court judgment, except that the charge. Identify the employer termination rights based on law. If you take the time to start a private matter. As a result, the employer company.Good model people like Shannon was an employer is legally terminated. This is revealed when Mr. Sarawut Bayetkun Feb. 6. Secretary-General of the Office of legal education Thai Bar Association hospitality training. It warned that their employees use Shannon may have been working at the time containing the termination from the employer. Without the sub-lessee and compensation because the judgment of the Supreme Court case and a case example. When the middle of the year there is a strong case that the court case number 2564 (2021) Central black/2557 (2014) exercise a day when Ms. Nitha see notes fongborisat Sino TRANS. Thailand logistics c labor law restrictionsWhen the plaintiffs sued the defendant, whether the termination is without fault and does not advance the plaintiff pay 30000 Thai baht a month. the plaintiff is eligible for a replacement notice 59000 sinchang in Thai baht and are called up from unfair termination of interest rate reductions with 90000 7.5 baht per year. While the fight that the prosecution deliberately disobedience with beards to conceal legal work time to use for a private duty work under the standard fault. Unable to fulfill that assignment. Termination of the defendant does not speak and is a fair request, termination charge. In this case, the Court ruled to lift central labour charge. The plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court against the Labour Law Department.Generally, the Supreme Court indicated that the defendants employed the plaintiff trial. When Jan. 25, 2010 Define 3 months later, Apr. 2, 2010 The defendant told the plaintiff terminated because company defendants play computer Internet privacy talk regularly, almost every day. It is an hour per day, considered to be the plaintiff, the defendant's time to work on the subject, not about the work that is under probation. The plaintiff must have worked carefully, otherwise it will make the defendant damaged. This case is not to perform their duties properly and in good faith, by its. The defendant, the plaintiff is terminated immediately. Without the sub-lessee in advance and do not pay by the civil and commercial code sinchang section 583 consisting of labour protection in section 17 paragraph 2541 (1998) end.The plaintiff appealed that the action of the plaintiff, and the defendant is not guilty it is not damaged. The Supreme Court indicated that the issue of Appeal appeal on the facts to the legal text. Prohibited by the Labour Court established Act and how the trial of labor article 54 paragraph 1 2522 (1979) The Supreme Court did not receive a diagnosis. The plaintiff appealed that court section Central diagnostic strength in addition to sue outside of computer memory usage issue regarding past champions in the private affair. Diagnosing this issue shows that the defendant has been damaged. When it is time to take out his personal talk regularly, almost every day. Make the fault and delay functions. Why such a dependency, not outside issues. Court central unlawful force. The plaintiff appealed to the fifth. Judge stands to raise the charge.Mr. sara sarawut said this lawsuit serves the accounting officer shall require caution. The employees take the time to chat in the matters of time, play, takhui the task. Make the employer company. The employer shall have the right to dictate termination without advance and the defendant has no rights to get damaged. This case is a good model given to those employed in a social age to know the time in any Internet chat chat taprokraem. So it doesn't affect the time should play at the right time.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..