The 34 scale on which La kitcha determines whether the employee has the right to leave a necessary errand. According to the regulations regarding the operation of the employer, which is written khangkwang quite so much.Translation of this article haha We need to distinguish the two is coming out the first text message, employees have an errand to ensure necessary to leave.Means if there is an errand company? The employer is obliged to give the employee an ass. An errand is required depends on the cause and the effect are such holed employees that may occur.Or privacy in normal life of people in General, as well as the discretion of the person who has the power to grant leave or not, which is the Organization's work, regardless of whether they have or not.And morale of the people in the organization.An activity is necessary and may cause adverse effects, such as a note to yourself or a close relative. Like parents illness. A sick child Husband and wife sick Personal rights such as marriage, ordination treat or include an upasampada religious one required to profess that religion. There is an important reason, according to the official's appointment, etc., which this kind of errand, if employees do not have to stop working, it may cause adverse effects to themselves or close relatives.This type of activity The employer is required to grant employees. Inevitable because it goes contrary to section-34 and employed sue.! Other types of activity that may not be necessary, such as a wedding, friends. Brothers A close relative marry or do anything if the employee is not going to affect not only themselves too much. This one, ask the employer's discretion, depending on the dude may be allowed or not, but they do not strain or too many. I think morale issues and labor relations is good, but they don't work as well as damaged. The following message sections according to the regulations regarding the operation of the employer, this means that the employer will issue regulations the rules and controls, however, are not controversial or contrary to the law, employers cannot control, corrupt or abusive employers have employed too. As an employer, will pay for an ass, or a year, or they will pay for it, how many days an ass, but the employer considers appropriate and as the regulations in force about cho to work to clear it.However, some organizations, to determine that no more than one year, an ass ... it can define it, but in practice it must be reversed in the first verse, another message as well. Assuming that no more than one year have an ass for 10 days.And get paid for it, but if an employee is La La holed up more than 10 days. The year-on-year, with grounds need to leave again. The employer must provide leave me because in reality nobody has given even the employers that we will have an errand needed a few days in a year, but more than 10 days, you may be OK with employees that they will not pay, so I agreed to write the regulations regarding work on issues of la activities.Should write better! Don't commit yourself too can not use discretion, and provide some flexibility to use discretion and fairness has occurred on both sides of the law.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
