The law is the regulator behave in social situations. Developed from moral and religious traditions, customs, rules, regulations, respectively, for the purpose of maintaining public order and good morals of society members. Both to coexist in a society that is going smoothly. Meet the needs of various sectors appropriately
law Ayutthaya
Ayutthaya charge of second Thani Thailand. It was established in 1893 - 2310 Monarch era. This law has created a lot of science called royal. Diplomatic these sciences The start was referred to the University of Manu is the master called 'Manu monoliths Ecclesiastes' Manusmṛti edition of Ecclesiastes Manu confessed this. The law has its origins in India. Called Vedic Manusmṛti. Mon later prospered and territorial Peninsula before. Translated the original Vedic Sanskrit as a language called Pali. 'Vedic Dharma Satya sponsor partners' and alter some provisions that are appropriate for their community. Subsequently, the lawyer in modern Thailand, Ayutthaya take the Vedic Mon Mon primarily in their legislation. Criminal law in a manner that will lose the most in that era laws on paper records started already. It is believed that legislation in the past. It remains the only official version only include three original king applications. The Commissioner General of Lords to read together. Or copied to The final version will be the judge to consider legal action to
investigate by torturing the accused
people were officially charged with an offense against God. Or to the country are not treated fairly. The law treats the defendant is guilty before the court to judge him. Contrary to evidence law in Thailand today. The court treats everyone is innocent until the courts decide whether he is guilty. On the first floor, but that the accused is guilty. The formal request by the defendant pleaded guilty, but good. The defendant pleaded not simply surrender to the metropolitan court. Or any other court of competent jurisdiction to investigate by torturing the accused was investigate by torturing the accused is penalizing for justice. During consideration of Tralakar Tralakar authorized punitive beatings or torture, hammering nails, press one's temple defendant in various ways unless the defendant to plead. If Tralakar believe that the defendant also pleaded not totally convinced that the defendant did not squeal or co-perpetrator. It has the power to punish a defendant for another penalty. Although the defendant confessed that he is guilty then. Investigate by torturing the accused has both advantages and disadvantages. That is a good result The culprit is often confess guilt and squeal partisan co-perpetrator. And make people fear the law of the country with the current law that allows criminal offense has been denied justice. The culprit is lying to the court's jurisdiction or not. No penalties were in any danger. This is why the criminal mind. Do not fear the courts as before. However, investigate by torturing the accused may have a negative effect on the miss. The defendant may be innocent. But not tolerate torture I must confess I was sentenced to death or were executed there. It is also a channel for court officials. Corruption, extortion with the other defendants.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..