The Federal Government and system integration From the law of procedure and the rules. The system of Government can profoundly affect the nation's supply system. The three basic types of Government that are found around the world. In the system, including the power of the country. The Government is the only subnational administrative arm of the Federal Government, is the Government's second category in regional or State sovereignty and around Confederation, they band together to create a national State. The Federal Government will accept the use of the Government's wishes and orders in the region. The third is the Federal Government, provincial government, or a Government Manual power power in the political system only. The latter system is likely to produce a diverse array of protection services, while boosting innovation, but the next problem with government coordination many unique activities. In addition, some systems, each State Federation of constitutionally delegated authority in the area, while in other systems, a line of authority is blurred because of the federal system is likely to be used for both national and subnational levels of the Government powers to interjurisdictional competition could ultimately hurt anti-corruption strategy. The main reason the structure of procurement systems are important concerns that overlap between different levels of Government that will work to coordinate and supervise the procurement problems. The consequences of the blurring of powers The interpretation of what is the proper procurement system is in the middle was tardy. In the environment, such as a local anchor can be an opportunity for one of the country's corruption in the area at the time, there are no others. Therefore, minimum The standard procurement system integration and operation process is essential in order to combat fraud; this can help the Government increase through cooperative regional and local. The structure. In the middle of the procurement because the procurement is important to institutions, corruption in developing countries, the search for an overall responsibility for procurement policies for government agencies such as Ministry of the country proved useful, even though the link between corruption and empowering all clear (Fjeldstad 2546 (2003): 4), the latest research shows that empowering (bardhan and and Shah 2000 and 2005; gurgur mookherjee), however, decentralizing procurement in developing countries, must be approached with caution, the lack of technical expertise at the local level can prevent a positive result. Because they make more accessible (bardhan and mookerjee carbonera 2000 2003; bribes). That corruption is widespread, attempts to deal with it as a series of separate problems often do not. Anti corruption efforts sustainable, based on the number of stakeholders all parts of them in a holistic way (Pope 2000) because alone is often insufficient and uncertain and almost always to blame high failed to inhibit crime. Some of the strategies (marjit and shi1998) should be highlighted defense when feeling and national planning. While some elements are required to plan and execute all participation at all levels of the local government level. As well as local, is necessary in order to achieve success (of the Office on drugs and crime, United Nations 2547 (2004) to public sector procurement and contract management system particularly vulnerable to corruption at the time the budget is tight or inflation is higher, because the vendor payments can be delayed and civil servants'pay may not be enough to resist corruption. Of course van rijckeghem and weder (1997), there is evidence that corruption will decrease in the development of the country that civil servants are paid better. The appropriate level of distribution of power is difficult to assess because of the procurement process that effectively reduces the opportunities for corruption in the Government, on the other hand, may not be a result of local government because of massive damage. Especially in developing countries where it is endemic, and across the country. The Central Government must have a role in monitoring the performance of local procurement officials. By acting as a guard dog, procurement National Governments can guarantee for the services and reserve the right to intervene when necessary. Combining power and power distribution Developing countries will need to consider the implications of how the energy is distributed, and the exercise by the Government procurement system in pipe. For several reasons The corruption is reduced when the transparency of the system expansion, but decided not to do the local benefits understand why difficult to decide the actual supply to. Therefore, these countries need a heavy performance can be taken from the national to the global supply system to prevent the loss of responsibility and legitimacy that may result from the structure of the decision on the local level opaque. . สถาปัตยกรรมการกระจายมากที่สุดกะพลังระดับต่ำสุดของข้าราชการและพนักงานสายของพวกเขา โดย fragmenting อำนาจ การกระจายอำนาจ มักจะเห็นเป็นหนึ่งในวิธีที่ดีที่สุดที่จะเพิ่มการแข่งขันระหว่าง เสริมสร้างการตรวจสอบและยอดคงเหลือที่เพิ่มความรับผิดชอบโดยตอบสนองต่อความต้องการของท้องถิ่น และอาจจะลดบทบาทของรัฐโดยทั่วไปปัญหายังคงอยู่ที่การกระจายอำนาจอาจเพิ่มศักยภาพในการทุจริตในระดับท้องถิ่น ถ้าเจ้าหน้าที่ในตำแหน่งเหล่านี้มีโอกาสที่ระบุไว้ก่อนหน้านี้มีส่วนร่วมในการทุจริต เพราะลดความสามารถในการจัดการทางการเงินและการตรวจสอบระบบ และข้อจำกัดของทรัพยากรทางการเงินมากขึ้นในระดับท้องถิ่น ( ซึ่งมักจะนำไปสู่การลดจ่ายข้าราชการ )แรงจูงใจที่แข็งแกร่งเพื่อต่อสู้ในการฝึกอาจมีอยู่ ดังนั้น การพัฒนาประเทศต้องคำนึงถึง trade-offs ที่ต่างกันและความจุของรัฐบาลของพวกเขา เมื่อเลือกระบบการจัดซื้อจัดจ้างของพวกเขา .
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..