Research
Assessment Course Master. In Curriculum and Instruction,
Faculty of Education. Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University
Researcher Dr. Sirinath Kol and the central
agencies. Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University
FY 2558
Abstract
Assessment Program Master. In Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University. The objective of this research is to 1) evaluate the course Master of Education (Revised 2555) in Curriculum and Instruction in the context of inputs. The process output side effects effectiveness. Sustainability And the transfer of knowledge and 2) to study the problem and develop solutions. Course Master of Education (Revised 2555) in Curriculum and Instruction. The concept of the course evaluation form based on CIPP Model of Daniel L.Stufflebeam. Applications include the contextual inputs. The process output side effects effectiveness. Sustainability And the transfer of knowledge. The goal of the assessment courses including Bachelor of 7 students, 29 graduate users who graduates seven people who taught Committee / Advisory Number 7 and the program committee of five instruments to collect information, a questionnaire and. a structured interviews Inquiries and interviews with the statistical methods used to analyze data such as frequency, percentage, average and standard deviation (SD) for the results of the study are as follows:
1. Overview of targets to Evaluation Master. (Revised
BE 2555) in Curriculum and Instruction in the Graduate mostly female, 85.7 percent and men 14.3 percent the status of education by graduating 100 percent of respondents period of two years, hundreds. 100 college students found that females of 86.2 and a male four people, 13.8 percent are studying in 1st year of 75.9, followed by 3rd year 13.8 percent lecturer of the course / instructor. / advisor is found to be 57.14 percent male and 42.86 percent female teachers in subjects most closely associated. 57.14 per cent, followed by the group of specialists. 42.86 per cent of experience in teaching and Audit thesis not exceeding five years, 42.86 percent, followed by 11-15 years, 6-10 years, 28.57 percent and 14.32 percent, the most relevant. Is the advisor of 42.86, followed by the Executive Course 28.57 percent and Lecturer Program of 14:32 Program Committee found that males of 20:00 and the female was 4 percent 80.00 and a lectureship much. 80.00 percent, followed by the assistant professor of 20:00
2. data Analysis Program evaluation Master. In Curriculum and
Instruction in the overall context of the inputs. The process output side effects effectiveness. Sustainability and the transfer of knowledge. Summarized as follows:
2.1 Assessment Program in Curriculum and Instruction from the University graduate student course lecturer / instructor / advisor. The overall opinion is very reasonable level. Student opinions on the overall maximum. Users graduates and course lecturer / instructor / advisor. Opinion as a whole at a high level as well,
2.2. Results of the evaluation showed that the overall context of the review of graduate students, faculty and course / instructor / advisor. Opinions on Program Evaluation Context Overall, in most graduates opinions at the highest level, followed by the teacher course / instructor / advisor and student, respectively BY clause that deals with the comments. the highest is the right number of credits for all courses. And the lowest course to meet the manpower needs of local and international graduates have also commented that the course is appropriate for all subjects. The instructor saw that Courses should be improved, with four courses is 102 611 Education for Social Development of Learning 102 662 research workshop on curriculum and instruction, and 102,672 information technology to teaching and 600,511 English graduate percent. 14:30
the input was 2.3 Overview of the opinions of graduate students and professors of the course / instructor / advisor. Opinions on Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel input. The overall level of student opinion at the highest level, followed by the graduates and faculty course / instructor / advisor, respectively BY clause that deals with the high reviews. most academic qualifications, knowledge, experience and research potential of the faculty. And the lowest was the learners with the fundamental right to education Master level
2.4. The process revealed that an overview of the opinions of graduate students and professors of the course / instructor / advisor. Opinions on Program Evaluation Process Overall, the highest level of a Bachelor of opinion at the highest level, followed by the students and faculty of the course / instructor / advisor, respectively BY clause that deals with level. Money is the most advanced system of academic advisors and consultants, New York.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..