If that is the case, it looks like

If that is the case, it looks like revisiting the contours of the Bloomington School’s place and
contributions in the context of the applied field of Public Administration is of great interest in
more than oneway. This paper is an attempt to dealwith some of the challenges emerging from
that task and it has several main objectives: first, to outline briefly the nature of Public
Administration as a field, with a view to better understand its inherent link with Public Choice
and why in order to gain policy relevance, Public Choice needs to systematically engage it.
Clarifying this point will give an enhanced sense of the meaning and context of the Ostroms’
work in this respect: an attempt to promote the Public Choice perspective in Public Administration,
and the Public Administration perspective in Public Choice. Second, to take a closer
look at the nature, significance and reception of Ostroms’ work in the field of Public Administration
and to substantiate the claim that the Ostroms were the main advocates of Public
Choice in Public Administration studies and that they were recognized as such by the field. The
evidence is overwhelming and the fact that this essential side of their contribution seems largely
to be neglected today requires some explanation. Third, to take note of the reception of the
Ostroms’ Public Administration perspective in the context of Public Choice—or more precisely,
of its fiasco. Last but not least, to look at what could be said about the limits of the
standard Public Choice approach, when seen from the viewpoint of the Ostroms and what the
insights gained from that perspective may mean to us today.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

If that is the Case, it looks like revisiting the contours of the Bloomington School's Place and
contributions in the context of the Applied Field of Public Administration of Great interest is in
more than oneway. This Paper is an attempt to dealwith Some of the challenges emerging from
that Task and it has several Main objectives: First, to outline briefly the nature of Public
Administration as a Field, with a View to better Understand ITS inherent link with Public Choice
and why. in Order to gain Policy relevance, Public Choice Needs to systematically Engage it.
Clarifying this Point Will give an Enhanced Sense of the meaning and context of the Ostroms'
Work in this respect: an attempt to promote the Public Choice Perspective in Public Administration,
and. the Public Administration perspective in Public Choice. Second, to take a closer
Look at the nature, significance and reception of Ostroms' Work in the Field of Public Administration
and to substantiate the claim that the Ostroms were the Main advocates of Public
Choice in Public Administration Studies and that they were recognized as such. by the field. The
Evidence is overwhelming and the Essential Fact that this Side of their contribution seems largely
to be Neglected Some today requires explanation. Third, to take note of the reception of the
Ostroms' Public Administration Perspective in the context of Public Choice-or more precisely,
of ITS Fiasco. Last but not Least, Look at what could be said to About the limits of the
standard Public Choice approach, when seen from the Viewpoint of the Ostroms and what the
insights gained from that US Perspective May Mean to today.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

If that is, the case it looks like revisiting the contours of the Bloomington School s place and. "Contributions in the context of the applied field of Public Administration is of great interest in.More than oneway. This paper is an attempt to dealwith some of the challenges emerging from.That task and it has several main objectives: first to outline, briefly the nature of Public.Administration as a field with a, view to better understand its inherent link with Public Choice.And why in order to gain, policy relevance Public Choice needs to systematically engage it.Clarifying this point will give an enhanced sense of the meaning and context of the Ostroms. "Work in this respect: an attempt to promote the Public Choice perspective in, Public AdministrationAnd the Public Administration perspective in Public Choice. Second to take, a closer.Look at, the nature significance and reception of Ostroms" work in the field of Public Administration.And to substantiate the claim that the Ostroms were the main advocates of Public.Choice in Public Administration studies and that they were recognized as such by the field. The.Evidence is overwhelming and the fact that this essential side of their contribution seems largely.To be neglected today requires some explanation. Third to take, note of the reception of the.Ostroms" Public Administration perspective in the context of Public Choice - more, or preciselyOf its fiasco. Last but not least to look, at what could be said about the limits of the.Standard Public Choice approach when seen, from the viewpoint of the Ostroms and what the.Insights gained from that perspective may mean to us today.