Provides funding for reducing greenhouse gas emissions growth in developing countries is one of the biggest unsettled issues on the agenda. The key question for funding mitigation is who pays for gas reductions in developing countries. (Countries implementing or developing countries, whether through public funds or transactions in the carbon market, the private sector) and who has been credited for reducing greenhouse gas emissions
to global warming sustainability is to solve that. The root cause of the problem When greenhouse gases from human activities are causing global warming. It must reduce its emissions. However, as in the past, each country's greenhouse gas emissions for developed countries to their unequal. It should be a lot of responsibility - a little different, too) who is ever released, many were obliged to reduce their emissions even more in the future. As someone who has tried his best to leave a little more than necessary and try not to drop considerably reduced. This principle is acceptable under. The UN Convention on climate change (UNFCCC) The Kyoto Protocol (Kyoto Protocol) are the main contracts that forced the developed countries. (Annex 1 countries that signed the Protocol) to reduce gas emissions. The amount of the agreed
concept. "To offset the emissions" (Offsetting) or "carbon trading" (carbon trading) is to provide those who need to reduce gas emissions. People can reduce the offer. The idea was to create a mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol's "Clean Development Mechanism", or CDMA (CDM: Clean Development Mechanism) to help developing countries being forced to reduce emissions, however. reduce the cost of claims in their own country too. Outsourcing to developing countries to reduce emissions of the costs claimed by those countries cheaper and provide financial assistance to poor countries has created various projects. At the same time The market mechanism that area. "Carbon market" to force the value of carbon to be offset by trade. "Carbon Credits" (carbon credit) by a mechanism called CDM-Clean Development Mechanism as a management system under the Kyoto Protocol. The need to create incentives to invest in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Reduce the amount of greenhouse gases that are accredited investors as the CERs CERs can be sold to industrialized countries that have committed themselves. To reduce greenhouse gases, or it can be profitable to trade in carbon trading market exists. For developing countries to undertake emissions reduction technology development in the country and may be supported by strong domestic action. But the action may be more cost effective and technology transfer could be deeper if the market for international action. The meaning may be that mechanism with the necessary flexibility not only. But in terms of economic efficiency. But certainly in terms of environmental performance. Public
Some developing countries have stated that the amount of public funds from developed countries, they are considered appropriate
for many developing countries argue in mitigation funds do not come from the willingness of these countries. But the fees owed to the developing countries in exchange for their likely reduced the level of emissions per capita than the developed countries, Brazil, China and India
for the financial operations of the fund color. These credits will be green. "There may be a reduction rules to ensure the environmental integrity of the scheme." In addition to maintaining the environmental performance of the factor of discount may maintain a strong incentive for developed countries to reduce emissions in the country: from. the perspective of developed countries as a discount factor equal to the additional cost of compensation compared with the costs of reducing emissions in the country. With similar goals in mind, a number of other parties have suggested limited stock of emission reduction commitments of developed countries to follow through check to pay compensation
to the conflict. offsets may be driven by a genuine concern among developing countries. In developed countries do not provide support for reducing emissions seriously. For the issue of relief It might have been of interest to many developing countries and. Especially LDCs, to seek a compromise that will allow worldwide use. offsets higher expectations in exchange for their commitment to developing countries. The trade-off is that Indonesia and Mexico. For example, people say. Such a compromise may help promote the interest of the LDCs is to reduce the impact of climate change in the future. The International Fund rare treat for adaptation and attracting investment for the vast namas.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..