' The Court requested revocation thepthai an arrest warrantIssuing an arrest warrant ' thepthai. The Supreme Court will hear the case strikes a deform succeeds Sue products provide intense min ' is not the intention to sweep the weekend escape. The Court let withdrawal-strikes again, Jun. 10. May 7: 58 when at 11.30 pending criminal court, 807? Ratchadapisek Rd. Court appearances, read the judgment of the Supreme Court. The black A. the 2553 (2010) Suratwadi Plotprasop 858/Mr. รมว., a former science and technology. The plaintiff sued for a Thai party filed Mr. Nakhonsithamrat's former House Rep. thepthai The Democrat party and Abhisit Wetchachiwa, a former spokesman for Mr. identification as a defendant. The victim to defame someone by advertising, according to the Criminal Code Section 326 and 328 due Feb. 18 53 cases when Mr. thepthai, the interview that Mr. bright is a person who succeeds in their owner Thaksin regime fall. But nevertheless, when it's time for appearances, it appears that the Prosecution Department. Have a representative come to court. When the defendant and the lawyer did not come to court. Until 12.00 p.m. the Court to examine and see that the defendant has received the likes, but it did not come to court without inconvenience, there are circumstances indicating that escape. Therefore, out of an arrest warrant for the defendant to come listen to the judgment and verdict reading strikes again, this time 09.00 pm, Jun. 10. Journalists reported that for this case the appeal court judgment and the Court stands, but sue because the plaintiff is entitled as politicians have been criticized both for the defendant, interview by opinion-oriented questions to the plaintiff that the process has the owner is real or not is not a bad place, but it is fair to criticize, but just by the plaintiff succeeds, Mr. also use legal rights filed the Supreme Court cases. ' Thepthai. Request to withdraw an arrest warrant The time when the Criminal Court at 14.00 p.m. Ratchadapisek Rd. Thepthai said. The defendant, who was a court issued an arrest warrant has been traveling with a lawyer to discuss the request, the Court revoked an arrest warrant, which, come listen to the judgment of the Supreme Court. The black A. the non-858/2553 (2010) succeeds, the plaintiff's employer filed the charge. Mr. thepthai is a defendant. The victim to defame someone by advertising, according to the Criminal Code Section 326 and 328 due Feb. 18 53 cases when Mr. thepthai, the interview that Mr. bright is a person who succeeds in their owner Thaksin regime fall. By court order, issued an arrest warrant because the defendant had no thepthai said the Court without inconvenience to court, thus meeting listen to the judgment of the Supreme Court again, this time 09.00 am, Jun. 10, while Mr. thepthai said court that there is no intention to escape. Court to examine this case and see that the Court has issued an arrest warrant for the defendant, because it does not come to the Court, the defendant came to court, but arranged in the afternoon saying that the appearances that day, listening to the verdict, which sent it to an address that the defendant did not live. It simply has the name in current home registration, the defendant Live House in Bangkok, where the defendant has no intention to escape, not to listen to the verdict, so ask a court revoked an arrest warrant. The Court considered, and then allowed to revoke an arrest warrant and that the defendant came to listen to the judgment of the Supreme Court for the weekend this time 09.00 pm, Jun. 10.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..