This has been the case X Chakkris former marksmanship team. Assassination died Porsche. Maid seats come with an injury. The case is in the public interest. I myself made the case on hire to kill many cases. Both politicians are accused of military police, but lawyers only. Analyze about this case in view of an experienced attorney about the murder premeditated
first issue. The premeditated murder means the offender has committed a premeditated and that will kill anyone. This review has been decided. Committed themselves to kill others. There is a definition in law. But the wording in the judgment of the Supreme Court. 1633/2548
Second issue The premeditated killing of another person's identity to the offender. Considering the state of mind of each offender. If any case the offender is shared by many people, or more than one person at a law called the joint. Some offenders who kill others may share a guilty intent only kill others under the Criminal Code Article 288, but the offender or others who share a premeditated plan alone. May be guilty over murder in general is probably guilty of the premeditated murder of another under Penal Code section 289 (4), which the Supreme Court has never ruled on the Supreme Court. 433/2546
three issues Circumstances, however, to be known as premeditated murder. If we go to the Supreme Court, has put that norm. If any of the following acts constitute murder premeditated
one. To hire to kill the other
two. The conspirators planned to kill the other
three. To prepare the weapon used in the killing of
four. Preparing vehicles for the trip to kill others. Judgement of the Supreme Court by petition 554/2541 and 6738/2537
5. To Meet died accidentally. The defendant is a serious cause for resentment against the deceased before. And there is much resentment of the dead before. The defendant took the weapon and the teeth of the dead died accidentally. Not contemplated before, The defendant is guilty only of murder by deliberate only. (Reference to the Supreme Court 2539/2541, the Supreme Court 2241/2532)
6. hire to kill others, it is a premeditated murder as well. If people use them to kill others. After using it to kill the deceased involved with. Assume the user is engaged in a premeditated killing others. (Reference to the Supreme Court 3501/2538)
7. contemplated or planned to kill the man, but did not find anyone who wants to kill. To find one another This is not a premeditated murder. Not a premeditated murder. (Reference to the Supreme Court 4308-4309 / 2530)
8. The offender agreed to commit murder in a sudden. Not constitute premeditated murder. (Reference to the Supreme Court 1533/2548)
9. The defendant sat drinking with the deceased. The deceased flattering allusion to the parents. The defendant was angry and killed the deceased at that instant. The defendant did not appear to have been planned or contemplated before. Not constitute premeditated murder by the deceased. Only defendant took the victim to kill in secret only
10. Mad defendant who died in alcohol after 15 minutes to decide constitute premeditated murder. (Reference to the Supreme Court 3576/2533)
According to the law,
the Penal Code
Article 83 In case any offense caused by the actions of two or more persons. Those who have joined together as the perpetrator. Shall be punished by law for the offense
under Section 84 shall give rise to another offense, whether by force, threat, employment, aiding or abetting. Or by any other means Give him a perpetrator
if the perpetrator is available. Users must be punished as a principal. If the offense was committed, This is because those were not done. No action or any other cause. The user is liable to only one third of the punishment prescribed for the offense
under Section 288 who kill others. Shall be punished with the death penalty Life imprisonment Or imprisonment of fifteen to twenty years
, Section 289 Whoever
(4) others premeditated murder
shall be liable to the death penalty.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..