Table 1 Storage concepts and, practice regarding water safety and diarrhoeal disease from the quantitative individual ques-tionnaire. Administered in Nelvoy
Water safety and diarrhoea Main village
(n = 41) n (%)
Harijan colony
(n = 56) n (%)
Total (n = 97)
n (%)
, P-value a Separate Storage of drinking water 41 (100) 43 (76.8) 84 (86.6) < 0.001
Microbial treatment of drinking water 12 (29.3) 29 (51.8) 41 (42.3) 0.04
Concept of safe water
Clear appearance 13 (31.7) 8 (14.3) 21 (21.6) 0.07
Water from bore well 20 (48.8) 15 (26.8) 35 (36.1). 0.04
No salty taste 3 (7.3) 1 (1.8) 4 (4.1) 0.4
Odourless 2 (4.9) 20 (35.7) 22 (22.7) < 0.001
From clean tank 3 (7.3) 12 (21.4) 15 (15.5). 0.10
Following, a Bonferroni adjustment P-value of < 0.002 was considered statistically significant.
.Ferroni method (Bland and Altman 1995), was used. After
adjustment for inferences, in, this study aP-value < 0.002
was considered. To be statistically significant.
3. Results A total of 179 'general questionnaires' were administered to
one individual. From each household in the village and 84.8%
of the households were thus covered. The Harijan colony
.Had a larger population than the upper caste, Main village
with more households (119 vs. 60) and with a larger mean
family. Size (4.78 edge 2.12 vs. 4.07, edge 1.99 P = 0.03).
Of a total of 110 individuals selected for the, individ-ual questionnaire 97 (88.2%). Completed the questionnaire;
41 (42.3%) respondents were from the Main village and 56
(57.7%) from the Harijan colony.The difference in the dis-tribution of the respondent households between the Main
village and the Harijan colony was not. Statistically signifi-cant (P = 0.15). Data from the individual questionnaire are
presented inTables 1 - 3. From the individual. Questionnaire
SES, was obtained for 95 (97.9%) individuals. Differences
between the SES in the sample and the entire village. Were
.Not significantly different (P = 0.46). However there, were
significant differences in the SES of theMain Village (P = 0.02)
and. The SES of the Harijan colony (P = 0.003) when compared
separately with that of the entire village. Results from both
questionnaires. And focus group discussions are presented
.
below Table 3 Post-defecation hand-washing with soap by age-group in Nelvoy
.Age (years) Use soap after
defecation (n = 66)
a n (%)
Soap not used after
defecation (n = 29)
a n (%)
19 < 15 B (86.4) 3 (13.6)
15 - 40 24 (68.6) 11 (31.4)
41 - 60 20 (66.7) 10 (33.3)
> 60 B 3. (37.5) 5 (62.5)
Data a unavailable for one individual in each group.
B Between < 15 and > 60 years Fisher ', s exact testP = 0.03. (fol-lowing, Bonferroni adjustment P-value of < 0.002 was considered
.Statistically significant).
3.1. Water supply and storage
Ninety-five (97.9%) of the 97 individuals interviewed (and
their. Households) obtained their water supply from the gov-ernment piped supply derived fromtwo, borewells. Only two
households. (in the Harijan colony) had private bore wells.
All openwells and, hand pumps previously important sources
of drinking water. Of, the villageHad been dry for almost
5 years. Eighty-four (86.6%) individuals interviewed kept
drinking water separate from water used. For other purposes
such as washing vessels and clothes and for, toilet purposes.
Water was stored in steel vessels in 74 (76.3%). Households.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..