2. ผลการวิจัยในขั้นที่ 2 ของการวิจั

2. ผลการวิจัยในขั้นที่ 2 ของการวิจัยกึ่งทดลอง
2.1 รอบแรก หลังจากขั้นตอนการดำเนินอบรมเชิงปฏิบัติการอย่างมีส่วนร่วมแบบพาอิก ทั้ง 3 รอบ ผลการวิจัยพบว่า คะแนนเฉลี่ยจากระยะหลังการอบรมคะแนนสอบหลังเรียน ความรู้ด้านคุณลักษณะวิทยากร สิ่งแวดล้อมศึกษา การจัดการสิ่งแวดล้อม แรงบันดาลใจในการอนุรักษ์สิ่งแวดล้อม และพฤติกรรมการอนุรักษ์สิ่งแวดล้อม ผลคะแนนหลังอบรมสูงการก่อนอบรมอย่างมีนัยสำคัญทางสถิติ (p

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

2. the results of research on step 2 of the experimental research center.2.1 first round After the procedures workshop on participatory design took three cycles research Ignatius found that average scores from the stage after the students ' test scores after training. Knowledge of environmental education speakers feature to manage the environment. The inspiration for environmental protection and environmental conservation habits. High score after training konoprom statistical significant (p < < .01 .01, p, p, p < < .01 .01 .01 and < p) an estimate of the number of students 40 students in junior secondary classes to evaluate three areas consists of a self-evaluation, a friend and Director of the.Evaluation using analysis of variance. To examine differences in the average score of all three groups. Use One-way ANOVA statistics reveals that there is no difference in average scores on the process of participating in the training. Training, not statistical significant (p < .05) evaluated a student with the highest score of 10, shows the role of a researcher and the other 30 people remaining students will be facilitated by students attending in the round 1 will serve as the Board of Directors continue to manages training sessions 2.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

2. The results of the second stage of experimental research
2.1 the first steps to take after a workshop participant and Ignatius took the third round results were found. The average score from distance after training posttest scores. Knowledge of speakers features Environmental Education Environmental Management Inspired in environmental conservation. Behavioral and environmental conservation Scores after the first training workshop with high statistical significance (p <.01, p <.01, p <.01, p <.01 and p <.01) to evaluate the student's class of 40 students. junior assess three areas: self-assessment, evaluation and fellow facilitator evaluation using one-way analysis of variance. In examining the different average rate of the three groups using One-way ANOVA showed no statistical difference in mean score on the processes involved in coaching. Training is not statistically significant (p <.05) were assessed 10 students with the highest scores to role-play as a guest speaker. And another 30 students who will be the facilitator. The students who attended the first round of training will serve as the second round next.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

2. The results in step 2 of quasi-experimental research
2.1 first round, after the implementation of participatory workshop a take. The 3 around. Research found. The score of test scores during the training after school Knowledge of training features of environmental education.The inspiration of environmental conservation. Behavior and environmental conservation. Results after training high before training significantly (P <.01, the P <. 01 P <. 01,, and P <. 01 P <. 01), assessment of students 40 people. Lower secondary students in three aspects, self assessment assessmentPeer assessment and facilitate evaluation using one-way analysis of variance. In order to determine the difference scores of three groups were used to One-way ANOVA.Training significantly P <.05), evaluation of students with the highest score 10 to assume a role instructors and students 30 people. The rest are convenient. The students who participated in the round 1 will act as a board of management training 2 round next
.