The solution to terrorism is another way, which is how we're doing now is creating agreements with various countries. The measures together to prevent and crack down severely in an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth to give the impression that the attempted terrorism, it is not the will and the consequences will cause damage equal regard. to be afraid or intimidated by the nature of deterrence is to be overconfident of those with the terrorism that is worrisome. Terrorism is damaging to the country where it was committed. Has led to behavior which is alien to the traditions and practices of traditional, such as the bombing in Bali resulted in the deaths of Australians are hundreds of people that make policy announcements Pre-emptive strike. or to prevent attacks before a disaster occurs. This means that if there is more evident that there is a bomb, a place where the people of that country of residence, such as in hotels, etc., in which its citizens are harmed able to raise troops crossed the border to attack the group. people are going to bomb the hotel. If you have an event of this happening by international agreements imprecise. Then the violation of the sovereignty of the country. Became a big international event has grown. The actions that are contrary to the traditions and rules of international relations. Including law As a result of terrorist violence not only cause damage to life and property only. It also affects the regulation of international relations with the solution to terrorism should be viewed from multiple dimensions. The most important solution to the cause or reason, called the foundation. The use of violent deterrence is necessary, unavoidable. But that's not a permanent solution. The combination of deterrence and negotiate an agreement that satisfied both parties would be the best solution.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..